Not that I'm saying Hillis will stay or go but if you're looking at the high powered "pass first" offenses (NE & GB), which seems to be the way Cleveland wants to go, they don't really have a "feature back" and the backs they do have certainly aren't power backs like Hillis.lhslep134;924672 wrote:If you guys think about it, it makes perfect sense. Hillis broke out last year in an offense conducive for him to do so. Pat Shurmer's offense? Not so much. Hardesty is much more of a fit for the offense than Hillis, as evidenced by the extensive amount of touches Hardesty is getting. If we really wanted to keep Hillis, we would have extended him by now because we have a lot of money to do so. It's not that Hillis isn't a good player, but he's just not a fit for Shurmer's offense, and it appears if one of them has to give, it's Hillis.
Hardesty DOES have more upside but will he stay healthy? Truth be told, Hardesty & Armond Smith are better fits for this offense. There's a reason they went out and got Brandon Jackson in the offseason....different style of back.