Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Oct 3, 2011 8:34am
You guys just love to bicker don't you? 
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 3, 2011 8:34am
Didn't need that explained dipshit. Not suprised it was difficult for you to understand, my apologies ( http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apologies ) for not spelling it out and providing links for the difficult (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/difficult ) words. You said that like_that and I "run amok (suprised you knew that word, way to use a thesaurus ( http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/thesaurus ). You have yet to provide an example of this total BS claim. Nice fail turdo.trolldo212000;920219 wrote:No, S&L said that he hadnt posted / trolled Bengals threads, you followed his post by saying I make stuff up. Terry Tate posted one of his troll-like posts from the Broncos game. I then told you to go see Tate's post showing that I was not making it up. Follow now?
I really can't believe you needed that explained
Cue the following responses from jordo: 1. something with "haha" then a spin, 2. avoiding whatever was said to him and just repeating himself, 3. "yawn"
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Oct 3, 2011 10:31am
+1. I've tried defending Bengals fans on here before but it's no use.Little Danny;920244 wrote:Sigh.... here we go again. I just posted on the topic of Bengal fans the other day. If I recall S&L, aren't you frm the Middletown area (one of the surrouding little towns if IIRC)? I would think you would know better.
There are a lot of Bengal fans out there (note I am not one of them, but given that I lived in Cincinnati for 7 years, I know enough). The ones in Greater Cincinnati and Kentucky are very passionate about their Bengals. However, they are fed up with the ownership and management (one and the same) of this team. 2 winning seasons in 20 years. Numerous 10 loss seasons. Poor draft decisions. Willingness to stick with players/coaches who are terrible. Getting players with shady pasts because you can pick them up cheaply. An owner who is not willing to hire a GM, expand his scouting department past his brother and a copy of The Sporting News. A stadium deal that ended up very badly for the tax payers of Hamilton County. To top it off, the owner is a major d-bag who conjures up images of Mr. Potter from the movie, "It's a Wonderful Life".
Bengal fans are not showing up until Mike Brown either dies, retires or gets the team taken away from him. It is really that simple. The Bengal fans will still root for the Bengals in their hearts (it is not as if they will suddenly become fans of the Green Bay Packers or something) , but they will not give Mike Brown anymore of their money.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 3, 2011 10:44am
You're not supposed to post in this thread unless I make fun of Marietta.justincredible;920493 wrote:+1. I've tried defending Bengals fans on here before but it's no use.
In all seriousness though, I understand danny's points, but the fact of the matter is if the Bengals were doing well, or they end up doing well this season, the stadium will be somewhat full by the end of the year. All those Mike Brown excuses are a cop out.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 3, 2011 10:48am
Friends? I call bullshit !jordo212000;919767 wrote: I was at a friends
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Oct 3, 2011 12:17pm
Crazy, right?BR1986FB;920498 wrote:Friends? I call bullshit !
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Oct 3, 2011 12:22pm
Just givin' you the business, man.jordo212000;920557 wrote:Crazy, right?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 3, 2011 12:27pm
I see you went with #2.jordo212000;920557 wrote:Crazy, right?
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Oct 3, 2011 12:46pm
Nah, just tired of explaining the same thing over and over to you. You guys just keep doing your "thing" by acting completely oblivious to what I was saying then and what I am saying now.Commander of Awesome;920567 wrote:I see you went with #2.
Has S&L thanked you for taking some of the heat off of him?
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Oct 3, 2011 12:46pm
Gotcha. I probably had that coming.BR1986FB;920562 wrote:Just givin' you the business, man.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 3, 2011 12:52pm
Wow followed it up with a 1,2,3 fail combo. Still waiting for my "running amok" in bungal threads. Nice fail.jordo212000;920582 wrote:Nah, just tired of explaining the same thing over and over to you. You guys just keep doing your "thing" by acting completely oblivious to what I was saying then and what I am saying now.
Has S&L thanked you for taking some of the heat off of him?
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Oct 3, 2011 12:57pm
I'm at work right now, but here's one example of you trolling Bengal fans.
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?29024-Buffalo-Bills-Cincinnati-Bengals
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?29024-Buffalo-Bills-Cincinnati-Bengals
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 3, 2011 1:18pm
LMAO nice reaching fail. I started that thread in the basement dipshit. That is not "running amok". Wow total fail.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Oct 4, 2011 8:05am
shut up ***, you like the cowboys. I'd rather go 0-16 than be a front running bitch.wildcats20;919769 wrote:Or everyone could just shut the fuck up about it.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Oct 4, 2011 8:09am
Raw Dawgin' it;921347 wrote:shut up ***, you like the cowboys. I'd rather go 0-16 than be a front running bitch.
Considering the Cowboys haven't been relevant since the 90s, how is that front running?
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Oct 4, 2011 8:41am
They're relevant in the field of choking. In recent years, not many have been more relevant.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Oct 4, 2011 9:26am
Do you watch football? If you don't i can understand you saying they're not relevant, but just because they haven't won doesn't mean they're not talked about like they're the yankees. Get a clue.ts1227;921348 wrote:Considering the Cowboys haven't been relevant since the 90s, how is that front running?
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Oct 4, 2011 9:27am
Wildcats out shopping...
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Oct 4, 2011 9:28am
Raw Dawgin' it;921406 wrote:Do you watch football? If you don't i can understand you saying they're not relevant, but just because they haven't won doesn't mean they're not talked about like they're the yankees. Get a clue.
They can talk about them all they want, they still haven't done shit in 15 years
C
coach_bob1
Posts: 130
Oct 4, 2011 9:28am
So since your inept Browns are incappable of beating the Bengals, you only have our fanbase to pick on? That sounds mature. I'd rather rather have the better team than the better fanbase.SportsAndLady;919718 wrote:You guys do realize that blaming the blackout only strengthens the argument that your fanbase sucks?
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Oct 4, 2011 9:32am
way to change your argument of them not being relevant.ts1227;921408 wrote:They can talk about them all they want, they still haven't done shit in 15 years
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Oct 4, 2011 9:36am
Raw Dawgin' it;921417 wrote:way to change your argument of them not being relevant.
Just clarifying that I meant relevant on the field and in the standings. I never said they don't get media hype.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Oct 4, 2011 9:55am
not relevant on the field would mean they don't get media hype....so this makes no sense. The Jaguars are not relevant and they don't get media hype...being relevant means you get media hype. Would you like to try again?ts1227;921422 wrote:Just clarifying that I meant relevant on the field and in the standings. I never said they don't get media hype.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Oct 4, 2011 9:57am
No.
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Oct 4, 2011 12:00pm
I pretty much agree.coach_bob1;921409 wrote:I'd rather rather have the better team than the better fanbase.