like_that;911573 wrote:lol thats cute, fellow Marietta grad coming to trolldo's rescue.



Excuse me while I LMFAO. Hilarious, Jordo finally gets one guy to support his idiotic posting, yet the poster is one of the biggest idiots on the CFB forum.



He is a douche bag, that is why no one likes him. 95% of his posts are SMH material.



Says the guy who was trolling on the NFL thread. LOL GTFO.

Says the guy whose posts account for 50% of the retatded web speak bullshit that make this place a fucking joke.

I'm not fighting that people think he's a troll. I honestly don't give a shit. But that post that s&l quoted while calling jordo a douche was not tolling and didn't warrant any sort of name calling. I'm not defending his stance on Kansas because I think its BS. Just pointing out that in this instance s&l is wrong in my opinion.

A&M just became the largest fanbase in the SEC.

^^^
How do you figure? Most Texans hate A&M. And now that they reside in the SEC most of the remaining nation does too.

j_crazy;911595 wrote:Says the guy whose posts account for 50% of the retatded web speak bullshit that make this place a fucking joke.

I'm not fighting that people think he's a troll. I honestly don't give a shit. But that post that s&l quoted while calling jordo a douche was not tolling and didn't warrant any sort of name calling. I'm not defending his stance on Kansas because I think its BS. Just pointing out that in this instance s&l is wrong in my opinion.

lol not a surprising response since it is coming from a poster who has something about this site to cry about every other week (ooo boohoo can we get rid of the basement now, boo hoo).

Thats fine on your opinion on s&l's comment. Right or wrong, trolldo has a reputation for being an idiot, so people treat him like one.

Tiernan;911646 wrote:^^^
How do you figure? Most Texans hate A&M. And now that they reside in the SEC most of the remaining nation does too.

Not scientific by any means, but this was in another thread a week or two ago.



Per this NY Times article: http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/19/the-geography-of-college-football-fans-and-realignment-chaos/utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+nyt/rss/Sports+%28NYT+%3E+Sports%29&seid=auto&smid=tw-nytimessports

like_that;911663 wrote:lol not a surprising response since it is coming from a poster who has something about this site to cry about every other week (ooo boohoo can we get rid of the basement now, boo hoo).

Thats fine on your opinion on s&l's comment. Right or wrong, trolldo has a reputation for being an idiot, so people treat him like one.

Every other week, or almost a year ago?

You're trying too hard.

like_that;911663 wrote:lol not a surprising response since it is coming from a poster who has something about this site to cry about every other week (ooo boohoo can we get rid of the basement now, boo hoo).

Thats fine on your opinion on s&l's comment. Right or wrong, trolldo has a reputation for being an idiot, so people treat him like one.

Every other week, or almost year ago?

j_crazy, don't you find it a little funny that like_that considers me to be the troll idiot? His back and forth with you is what he does ALL day long. He rarely contributes anything of substance. He just picks fights all day long

j_crazy;911595 wrote:I'm not defending his stance on Kansas because I think its BS.

It's just my opinion. I've looked over all of the realignment stuff, and the major players (Pac 12, Big 10, SEC) want nothing to do with schools who bring nothing to the football table. Utah, Colorado, Nebraska, TCU, Texas A&M, etc. bring nothing to the table basketball-wise. And a couple of them don't bring a whole to the table market-wise. However they all received invites due to their "chops" in football.

Furthermore, the ACC isn't inviting Kansas because it doesn't make sense geographically and really the only remaining logical landing spot would be the Big East. The Big East would then just be picking up the scraps from whatever the major players leave behind.

Just my opinion, but like I said, I would bet large amounts of money that Kansas never sniffs an invite from anybody not named the Big East or Mountain West.

j_crazy;911709 wrote:Every other week, or almost a year ago?

You're trying too hard.

j_crazy;911719 wrote:Every other week, or almost year ago?

And im trying to hard....

That was just one example of your crying.

jordo212000;911753 wrote:j_crazy, don't you find it a little funny that like_that considers me to be the troll idiot? His back and forth with you is what he does ALL day long. He rarely contributes anything of substance. He just picks fights all day long

The only person I really get into with is you, because you tend to be an idiot troll. So yeah, it might seem like that in every same thread we post in. Try not being an idiot, and everything would be normal.

edit: i forgot "haha"

jordo212000;911760 wrote:It's just my opinion. I've looked over all of the realignment stuff, and the major players (Pac 12, Big 10, SEC) want nothing to do with schools who bring nothing to the football table. Utah, Colorado, Nebraska, TCU, Texas A&M, etc. bring nothing to the table basketball-wise. And a couple of them don't bring a whole to the table market-wise. However they all received invites due to their "chops" in football.

Furthermore, the ACC isn't inviting Kansas because it doesn't make sense geographically and really the only remaining logical landing spot would be the Big East. The Big East would then just be picking up the scraps from whatever the major players leave behind.

Just my opinion, but like I said, I would bet large amounts of money that Kansas never sniffs an invite from anybody not named the Big East or Mountain West.

ONCE AGAIN, you're failing to see what the ENTIRE CONVERSATION was about....it wasn't about whether Kansas would get an invite...it whether they would get an invite if conferences moved to super conferences. And not only that, it was whether they would get an invite over a school like Boise State...you think Boise would get an invite over Kansas LOL (yet u still haven't explained why you think that...we all know it was for trolling purposes).

Speedofsand;911561 wrote:s&L is just a troll, probably was hoping I'd respond to his first 3 posts on this thread. When I didn't he picked another fight.
How is it different - "the exact opposite" posting in another thread just because there are more replies?

Yeah, I was just waiting for you to post LOL your username didn't even cross my mind, because I could give 2 shits about you