FatHobbit;908099 wrote:this...
is retarded
I was specific. I quoted everything you typed. It was all retarded. And I am no more anonymous than you are.Big Gain;908118 wrote:I notice you chose not to be specific. ALSO your derisive invective came from afar. COMPLETE ANONYMITY at is best and most used in today's world. It makes it easy and keeps the small minded or small in stature from getting punched in the mouth, shoved to the ground or from losing their job.
Ok, then what's your point again? You compared fans booing Fickell to employees booing their boss. Yet Fickell isn't the boss of the fans.Big Gain;908123 wrote:More lack of intellect on your part. Did I say Fickell reported to no one? READ CAREFULLY if you are capable. I said the managers, players and coaches reported to Fickell. Fickell reports to the AD? REALLY??????....How brilliant of you.
You are slower than I expected. Being "specific" requires an alternative to each thought. Not a one word insult.FatHobbit;908122 wrote:I was specific. I quoted everything you typed. It was all retarded. And I am no more anonymous than you are.
The comparison is the act of making a derisive invective AND the anonymity required. VERY few would make a derisive invective to the face of the individual unhappy with.WebFire;908125 wrote:Ok, then what's your point again? You compared fans booing Fickell to employees booing their boss. Yet Fickell isn't the boss of the fans.
FatHobbit;908122 wrote:I was specific. I quoted everything you typed. It was all retarded. And I am no more anonymous than you are.
Agreeing with what? And an alternative to what? That Fickell is my boss because I root for Ohio State? You are too stupid to reply to. GoodbyeBig Gain;908135 wrote:THANK YOU FOR AGREEING, even though you were incapable of supplying an alternative. See how easy it is for you or ANYONE on here to fire out a derisive invective when we are anonymous. Just like in a throng of over 100,000 people.
I don't disagree, but the comparison still sucked.Big Gain;908130 wrote:The comparison is the act of making a derisive invective AND the anonymity required. VERY few would make a derisive invective to the face of the individual unhappy with.
Big Gain;908090 wrote:Of the 10's of thousands of boo birds in the Shoe the only ones you know that are booing are the ones in close proximity to you. Of the ten's of thousands the only ones you actually know by name of are the ones you came with or if you have season tickets you might know a few in the near vicinity.
It makes perfect sense. Fickell is the boss of the team you are a fan of. Many people when talking about Ohio State say "we" instead Ohio State. That's how close many fans perceive themselves to be. Booing is a derisive invective directed at the "boss" of the team. I don't know any business or company that doesn't preach "team" at work. When at work among your "team" who in the hell would would be so stupid to make a derisive invective to your boss's face or near someone who might let the "boss" know who is "booing" him concerning a decision he made.
As originally specified, booing or expressing a derisive invective is 100% about anonymity. Irregardless of who the boss is or what the team is. No one with any intellect would boo in the face of the individual the boo bird is unhappy with.
They should, they are playing Colorado for god's sake. Let's wait until next week to really see how good OSU is this year.sleeper;909222 wrote:OSU better win this game by 2+ touchdowns or it'll be a terrible season(or a great season if you use ND logic).
We don't need to wait until next week. OSU isn't good this year.tk421;909224 wrote:They should, they are playing Colorado for god's sake. Let's wait until next week to really see how good OSU is this year.