BGFalcons82
Posts: 2,173
Sep 26, 2011 11:55am
Do you have a link? I didn't see any figures in the link I attached and the 2 embedded hyperlinks within were dead ends ad I'm not a subscriber to the Twin City paper.LJ;911684 wrote:$10,750 per worker per year. Or $206 per week. Less than they would get on unemployment.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 26, 2011 11:58am
It said $1.72 million over 4 years. Then I just did the math.BGFalcons82;911741 wrote:Do you have a link? I didn't see any figures in the link I attached and the 2 embedded hyperlinks within were dead ends ad I'm not a subscriber to the Twin City paper.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Sep 26, 2011 3:22pm
You're not supposed to actually think about things like that LJ, you're just supposed to scream about socialism and such.
believer
Posts: 8,153
Sep 26, 2011 4:39pm
I imagine they might also qualify for unemployment as well.LJ;911684 wrote:$10,750 per worker per year. Or $206 per week. Less than they would get on unemployment.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 26, 2011 4:50pm
Depends on the statebeliever;911953 wrote:I imagine they might also qualify for unemployment as well.