Scarlet_Buckeye;880408 wrote:The guy who gave him the test said he scored "significantly higher" than a 7. The same guy then said Pryor scored "significantly higher" the 2nd time around than the 1st.

If Pryor only scored a 22 on the 2nd time around, then what would he have "significantly improved" from?

It looks to me like the guy who administered the test is trying to protect Pryor.

LJ;880414 wrote:There ya go

karen lotz;880433 wrote:That quote doesn't necessarily say he didn't score a 7 on the first test. He said himself they go with the higher score when reporting to teams. Unless someone shows a copy of the test with Pryor's fingerprints on it, we aren't going to know what it was exactly.

The report of a seven test score is erroneous,

ccrunner609;880675 wrote:Glad to see he beat Can Newtons 21

LJ;880678 wrote:But, it does say that

ts1227;880682 wrote:Did Cam take it twice?

LJ;880414 wrote:There ya go

karen lotz;880433 wrote:That quote doesn't necessarily say he didn't score a 7 on the first test. He said himself they go with the higher score when reporting to teams.

Scarlet_Buckeye;881937 wrote:This.

Scarlet_Buckeye;880752 wrote:One can easily infer that "significantly higher" refers to his second score, which he goes on to say "we always go with the higher score;" while Pryor could have still "scored" a 7 on his first test.

LJ;881945 wrote:That quote says exactly that he didn't score a 7 on the first test. Can you not read? Either of you?

The report of a seven test score is erroneous," Colbert said. "I administered both tests

ts1227;881951 wrote:He was VERY vague. He said the first one in essence does not count, thus when he was talking about the "not a 7" score it can very easily be taken that he only meant the second one.

LJ;881954 wrote:Let me translate that for those who can't seem to understand what it says.

"I gave him the test 2 times, the report that he scored a 7 on one is false, I gave both tests"

"The report of a seven test score is erroneous," Colbert said. "I administered both tests and I can tell you that his score was significantly higher than that. I informed all teams and scouts interested in him about the score. In scouting, we always go with the higher Wonderlic score."

ts1227;881951 wrote:He was VERY vague. He said the first one in essence does not count, thus when he was talking about the "not a 7" score it can very easily be taken that he only meant the second one.

SportsAndLady;883563 wrote:From reading Colbert's quotes, it completely sounds like Pryor took the test 2 times and did not score a 7 on either test.

enigmaax;883533 wrote:Or maybe, the fact that he consistently refers to one score and not two means he is completely disregarding the irrelevant (from his perspective) lower score?



There is only one score that matters to this guy so he can't talk his terms and not lie about the first score because it means nothing.

enigmaax;883533 wrote:Or maybe, the fact that he consistently refers to one score and not two means he is completely disregarding the irrelevant (from his perspective) lower score?



There is only one score that matters to this guy so he can't talk his terms and not lie about the first score because it means nothing.