Reds vs Phillies....Game 1

Pro Sports 100 replies 1,770 views
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:15pm
Thata boy Wilson.
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:15pm
dave;876823 wrote:That's what you usually get with this great Reds staff. Get used to watching it for the next few days.

Lol ok thanks for the information.
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Aug 29, 2011 8:15pm
L
O
L
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Aug 29, 2011 8:16pm
Well that lead lasted long
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:17pm
Come on Shane big hit here.
M
mhs95_06
Posts: 8,167
Aug 29, 2011 8:18pm
Sappelt with a likely 3-run giving misplay!
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:19pm
Yep this ump isn't consistent. Same pitch was called a strike then a ball. I like the a good strike zone for a pitcher but don't change it from pitch to pitch.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Aug 29, 2011 8:20pm
mhs95_06;876834 wrote:Sappelt with a likely 3-run giving misplay!
Even if he catches it, it's still a run scoring play.

And Polanco hasn't singled in 2 yet lol
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Aug 29, 2011 8:20pm
That's a great pitch
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Aug 29, 2011 8:21pm
wow that was a filthy back door hook. Hanigan did an amazing job framing it.
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:21pm
SportsAndLady;876838 wrote:Even if he catches it, it's still a run scoring play.

Probably not. If he catches it on the run the Phillies don't sent Mayberry.
M
mhs95_06
Posts: 8,167
Aug 29, 2011 8:22pm
mhs95_06;876834 wrote:Sappelt with a likely 3-run giving misplay!
Great last two 3 ball curveballs to K Victorino makes it only a 1 run misplay, but with quite a few extra pitches caused.
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:23pm
dave;876840 wrote:wow that was a filthy back door hook. Hanigan did an amazing job framing it.
It was a great pitch but this slapdick of a ump already had his mind up he was going to ring of Shane no matter where the pitch was.
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Aug 29, 2011 8:23pm
Would have been a sac fly
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:26pm
Fuck Cole should be perfect though 5.
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:27pm
dave;876847 wrote:Would have been a sac fly

Not if he got a good jump on the ball he would have caught it running in. The Phillies would not have sent him.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Aug 29, 2011 8:31pm
Ridiculous non-error call on Phillips. Kelch said it on the radio and Boone said it on ESPN telecast....that is an error everytime....this is the big leagues...the ball into the web of the glove.....to me it gives him another non-error....but weakens how great he is. The Reds scorekeeper is a joke.....as for his triple....they always call it that way, I don't agree....but whatever. Hamels should be perfect.
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:31pm
Homer is looking real nice tonight.
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Aug 29, 2011 8:32pm
Tiger2003;876855 wrote:Not if he got a good jump on the ball he would have caught it running in. The Phillies would not have sent him.
I would bet my house they would have sent him. Sappelt is untested and the pitcher was coming up with 2 outs. It would have taken a near perfect throw, Mayberry isn't slow.
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:32pm
Ironman92;876864 wrote:Ridiculous non-error call on Phillips. Kelch said it on the radio and Boone said it on ESPN telecast....that is an error everytime....this is the big leagues...the ball into the web of the glove.....to me it gives him another non-error....but weakens how great he is. The Reds scorekeeper is a joke.....as for his triple....they always call it that way, I don't agree....but whatever. Hamels should be perfect.

Agree 100%
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:33pm
dave;876866 wrote:I would bet my house they would have sent him. Sappelt is untested and the pitcher was coming up with 2 outs. It would have taken a near perfect throw, Mayberry isn't slow.

I promise you the Phillies don't send him. Bet your house you would lose it.
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Aug 29, 2011 8:39pm
Well the Reds get a hit.
S
sportswizuhrd
Posts: 3,215
Aug 29, 2011 8:42pm
Thom alluded to it earlier that after many people saw Yonder in the line-up tonight, they wondered how long that would last. I myself included. Sounds like a riff is happening between Dusty and Walt...
Sources suggest there has been some difference of opinion over playing time between Reds GM Walt Jocketty and manager Dusty Baker, who has a year to go on his contract. The Reds are over .500 for the first time since early July, but it is curious how much playing time veterans Miguel Cairo and Freddie Lewis are getting in a lost season. Rival execs say they also would have traded Ramon Hernandez before the July 31 trade deadline and employed Devin Mesoraco as catcher. Hernandez was claimed on waivers by a competitor and pulled back by the Reds. He would have helped the Giants, among others.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/jon_heyman/08/29/award.leaders/index.html#ixzz1WT67RyvG
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Aug 29, 2011 8:42pm
Tiger2003;876869 wrote:I promise you the Phillies don't send him. Bet your house you would lose it.
lol no team is going to pass up a chance to get their first run in a 1-0 game so they can let their pitcher who is hitting .140 bat. at least not a team in first place. maybe the cubs would.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Aug 29, 2011 8:42pm
Tiger2003;876841 wrote:Probably not. If he catches it on the run the Phillies don't sent Mayberry.
If he starts in right away off the bat and catches it on the run, it would be close I agree.

But the way Sappelt went back then had to run in and make a diving attempt, no way the Phils don't score.