like_that;865941 wrote:Yeah, nice edit. Once again you selectively focus on one part of my post lol. And I am spinning it? I gave you three posts in a row that were going into a different direction. You can subtract my "time" statement out of my argument, and you still are wrong. Anything else you want to grasp for?

I edited at 10:37 you posted at 10:40...are you done?

And yes you are spinning it, when the posts are on the same page on the same night and within 5 of eachother. Id say that topic wasnt done being talked about and I didnt revive anything. But continue thinking otherwise lol

Hb31187;865945 wrote:I edited at 10:37 you posted at 10:40...are you done?

I wasn't implying you edited after the fact i posted, just thought it was funny you had to edit that in. How about you talk about 3 posts going into another direction? Oh you can't because it thwarts your argument. So does the time factor, but you wanted to cop out and try to call me out on using it before I posted it. You can say what you want, but the facts are in my favor. Just admit you were wrong and you brought the subject back up.

Can't wait for you to ignore most of my post only to choose two words to respond to. See, I didn't need to edit my post for this prediction.

And the fail comes in 3...2...1

like_that;865956 wrote:I wasn't implying you edited after the fact i posted, just thought it was funny you had to edit that in. How about you talk about 3 posts going into another direction? Oh you can't because it thwarts your argument. So does the time factor, but you wanted to cop out and try to call me out on using it before I posted it. You can say what you want, but the facts are in my favor. Just admit you were wrong and you brought the subject back up.

Can't wait for you to ignore most of my post only to choose two words to respond to. See, I didn't need to edit my post for this prediction.

Funny because I know exactly what your MO is and how you try to spin things to always appear right? Yeah not exactly hard to predict.

My argument wasnt that the posts before me were going in a different direction. They obviously werent about bandwagoning not denying that. But its not like bandwagoning was on page 1 and i brought it up on page 6. depending on your screen resolution the damn posts could be on the same screen. And the facts are not in your favor lol. Fact is 3 posts before me were not about bandwagoning but the subject was far from dead considering you just responded to it. Think whatever you want lol

like_that;865964 wrote:And the fail comes in 3...2...1

Got meeeeeeeee

Well this thread now blows. Thanks guys.

Maybe Stern would contract the Nuggets. Using skyhook's trolling fails, since they lost Melo the fans wont show up there this season. Or wait, did the Nugg's owners make Denver buy 20,000 season tickets for every game too?

Commander of Awesome;866006 wrote:Maybe Stern would contract the Nuggets. Using skyhook's trolling fails, since they lost Melo the fans wont show up there this season. Or wait, did the Nugg's owners make Denver buy 20,000 season tickets for every game too?

The Nuggets got a lot better after the Melo trade so the fans will show up. The Cavs not so much. Nice fail

Skyhook79;866025 wrote:The Nuggets got a lot better after the Melo trade so the fans will show up. The Cavs not so much. Nice fail

The Cavs are better now then they were last season.

hoops23;866031 wrote:The Cavs are better now then they were last season.

Based on? Performance? Paper? Hope? Guessing?