lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Aug 17, 2011 12:37am
hoops23;864843 wrote:No, Laley already addressed this. When you are team specific, you should play to your crowd. If not, you probably don't last as long.
.
Again, I was taught differently, because technically I broadcast nationally (meaning anyone on the internet could have listened). I had to assume that fans from both the opponent and Buckeyes would be listening. Almost every broadcast we had fans from the opponent's state listening in because they couldn't find the game on TV and we were one of the first things that popped up when you typed in internet radio for ohio state football.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Aug 17, 2011 12:38am
You're not Tom Hamilton.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Aug 17, 2011 12:39am
No doubt Chicago wins now.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Aug 17, 2011 12:39am
lhslep134;864844 wrote:Like I said, I was taught differently. In every venue I listed above that I broadcasted in objectivity was close to required. I witnessed an Oregon media member escorted out of the pressbox during the Rose Bowl because of repeated reactions to Oregon plays.
Verbal or Physical? You cant be jumping or anything like that. But verbal enthusiasm is usually allowed.
Ive been to many places for broadcasting as well, and if I am TV and near other TV, its objective. When I am on the radio area, we are all biased. The Big Ten Tourney for basketball was hilarious. 8 different schools sent radio, and it was just hilarious how excited we would get. Then we would go an have to interview the other players for TV and be objective.
Most radio broadcasters have a job because they are homers and their audience loves them, driving ratings. On TV, the ratings arent driven....at all....by the broadcasters. So they need to be more objective.
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Aug 17, 2011 12:40am
It will be a miracle if Durbin gets out of this.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Aug 17, 2011 12:40am
Fucking Juan Pierre and his bullshit solo homer... Frustrating.. On top of that, this team has 5 fucking triples.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Aug 17, 2011 12:41am
OK here's a legit question that I've never seen really happen....
But on that last foul out, does the on deck batter HAVE to move?
But on that last foul out, does the on deck batter HAVE to move?
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Aug 17, 2011 12:41am
royal_k;864851 wrote:It will be a miracle if Durbin gets out of this.
Miracles happen lol
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Aug 17, 2011 12:41am
wildcats20;864853 wrote:OK here's a legit question that I've never seen really happen....
But on that last foul out, does the on deck batter HAVE to move?
Yes
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Aug 17, 2011 12:43am
wildcats20;864853 wrote:OK here's a legit question that I've never seen really happen....
But on that last foul out, does the on deck batter HAVE to move?
Yes. Same with a base coach in his box. Or a ball boy etc.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Aug 17, 2011 12:46am
LaPorta is goin' yard.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Aug 17, 2011 12:47am
wildcats20;864861 wrote:LaPorta is goin' yard.
You have obviously not watched anyone but the Reds this year.
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Aug 17, 2011 12:47am
wildcats20;864861 wrote:LaPorta is goin' yard.
What are you smokin?
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Aug 17, 2011 12:48am
Laley23;864862 wrote:You have obviously not watched anyone but the Reds this year.
lol I gave it a try.
The last time I called an Indians HR, it was Hafner's walk off Granny.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Aug 17, 2011 12:49am
wildcats20;864864 wrote:lol I gave it a try.
The last time I called an Indians HR, it was Hafner's walk off Granny.
Well, I dont mind the effort. But please make it realistic. So your mojo can work.
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Aug 17, 2011 12:49am
wildcats20;864864 wrote:lol I gave it a try.
The last time I called an Indians HR, it was Hafner's walk off Granny.
By all means than, keep calling them.
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Aug 17, 2011 12:50am
I love Laporta's little league leadoff over there at first....lmao smh!
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Aug 17, 2011 12:51am
LOL^ He doesn't want to get caught leaning!
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Aug 17, 2011 12:52am
Has he been THAT bad lately?
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Aug 17, 2011 12:53am
lately....no. He had a nice bloop double that won us a game the other night. But he is so inconsistent!
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Aug 17, 2011 12:53am
Bags juiced with 1 out...
Hopefully Choo can at least get a sac fly.
Hopefully Choo can at least get a sac fly.
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Aug 17, 2011 12:54am
Here we go....
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Aug 17, 2011 12:54am
I really missed Brantley in our lineup....glad he is back!
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Aug 17, 2011 12:55am
OQB;864870 wrote:lately....no. He had a nice bloop double that won us a game the other night. But he is so inconsistent!
That bloop double is the ONLY thing he's done in the last several weeks lmao
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Aug 17, 2011 12:55am
ugh...choo...really?