300 wins, 500 HR, or 3000 hits....which is

Home Archive Pro Sports 300 wins, 500 HR, or 3000 hits....which is
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Jul 30, 2011 11:28 AM
more impressive and which is harder to do?


28 guys have 3000+ hits.
24 have 300+ wins.
25 have hit 500+ homeruns.

The landscape has changed in MLB a few times.
-You had the dead ball era.
-They lowered the mound 30 or so years ago to spurn hitting.
-Steroid era
-times when starters got alot more starts/season.
-back in the day hitters got to face tired pitchers more often late in the game instead of the constant use of the bullpen.


Remember......about 40% of the roster is pitchers, of which only 5 are starters.

My first glance was that 300 wins was the hardest and most impressive. It was the hardest because you are not always in control of the outcome because of the bullpen.

but, there are 24 of them and such a small amount of your roster is a starter.

And again......I am unsure if we will see many 300 win pitchers in the game again but I am sure we will see 3000 hits and 500HR multiple times.

So..what say you?

Take a 15 year career.
3000 hit guy has to average 200 hits a year. Pretty good year.
300 win guy has to average 20 wins a year. Not seen
Jul 30, 2011 11:28am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Jul 30, 2011 11:29 AM
300 wins
Jul 30, 2011 11:29am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jul 30, 2011 11:53 AM
300 wins. Starts don't play everyday, the stat depends on how your lineup is doing, and to make things tougher if you are in the AL you have to deal with a DH.
Jul 30, 2011 11:53am
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Jul 30, 2011 12:22 PM
300 wins easily. Especially with how babied starting pitchers are now a days
Jul 30, 2011 12:22pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Jul 30, 2011 12:31 PM
Hb31187;846572 wrote:300 wins easily. Especially with how babied starting pitchers are now a days

My thoughts exactly. That's 20 wins a year for 15 years. No way modern day pitchers are hitting that. You need to pitch 20+ years to have a realistic shot, and even then you probably need to pull a Greg Maddux and just dominate baseball for 4-5 consecutive years.
Jul 30, 2011 12:31pm
royal_k's avatar

royal_k

Senior Member

4,423 posts
Jul 30, 2011 12:40 PM
Yeah, 300 wins by far.
Jul 30, 2011 12:40pm
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Jul 30, 2011 12:46 PM
Hb31187;846572 wrote:300 wins easily. Especially with how babied starting pitchers are now a days

this.
Jul 30, 2011 12:46pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Jul 30, 2011 1:08 PM
wes_mantooth;846594 wrote:this.

That.
Jul 30, 2011 1:08pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jul 30, 2011 4:00 PM
wes_mantooth;846594 wrote:this.
Commander of Awesome;846604 wrote:That.

These.
Jul 30, 2011 4:00pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Jul 30, 2011 4:07 PM
It's harder for 300 wins....but maybe it shouldn't be...pitching today you have Sabathia and Halladay that may give it a run....but I'm not sold that a 4 man rotation or pitchers getting more innings at a younger age is better. A lot of 300 win pitchers that started in the mid 60's and threw there arms off until well into the 80's????? How did they pitch that much and so long?
Jul 30, 2011 4:07pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jul 30, 2011 5:46 PM
Easily 300 wins:

Only one where you dont control exactly the outcome, and the game has changed so much with bullpens that starters cant accumulate as many wins or starts each year. Hitters are the same. 4-5 ABs a game.
Jul 30, 2011 5:46pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jul 30, 2011 7:16 PM
There are only 2 current pitchers (that I92 mentioned) that have a shot at 300 wins. After them, no one has a shot at it again. Ever.

Easily the hardest of the 3.
Jul 30, 2011 7:16pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Jul 30, 2011 8:35 PM
justincredible;846781 wrote:There are only 2 current pitchers (that I92 mentioned) that have a shot at 300 wins. After them, no one has a shot at it again. Ever.

Easily the hardest of the 3.

It'll happen again....an extreme rarity...but we'll see it.
Jul 30, 2011 8:35pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jul 30, 2011 8:36 PM
If CC re-ups with the Yankees, I see him getting 300. If not, it will depends on where he goes, imo.
Jul 30, 2011 8:36pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jul 31, 2011 12:22 AM
Ironman92;846893 wrote:It'll happen again....an extreme rarity...but we'll see it.

Nope. Never.

If it does I'll give you $1000.
Jul 31, 2011 12:22am
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jul 31, 2011 12:23 AM
justincredible;847176 wrote:Nope. Never.

If it does I'll give you $1000.

Drew Pomeranz will win 400. Does that still count, or is it too many Ws??
Jul 31, 2011 12:23am
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Jul 31, 2011 12:25 AM
Laley23;847177 wrote:Drew Pomeranz will win 400. Does that still count, or is it too many Ws??

He'll be lucky to win 273.
Jul 31, 2011 12:25am
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jul 31, 2011 12:31 AM
justincredible;847178 wrote:He'll be lucky to win 273.

In the NL I agree. Yankees will sign him after his first 168 wins. He will end up with 409. Indians fans will be pissed for years.
Jul 31, 2011 12:31am
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Aug 6, 2011 3:52 PM
They all require incredible longevity and health to achieve them, but I think 300 wins is the toughest... trying to keep your body in shape long enought to average 20 wins a season for 15 years as a pitcher in that league is something you just dont see
Aug 6, 2011 3:52pm