stroups;843846 wrote:

ernest_t_bass;843879 wrote:Is that a GIBcop?

WebFire;843938 wrote:Unless there are pictures of money swapping hands, it's no different than the Buckeye shit, is it?

Pick6;843944 wrote:but OSU should have gotten the death penalty, and their situation is way worse than USCs, remember?

WebFire;843969 wrote:No I don't remember. I sure as hell never said that.

lhslep134;843994 wrote:No, you didn't but Dynasty did!

WebFire;843938 wrote:Unless there are pictures of money swapping hands, it's no different than the Buckeye ****, is it?

vball10set;844144 wrote:Why are you bringing the Buckeyes into this? I can tell OSU's dominance over tsun over the last decade has really gotten to you, and it will continue--count on it

WebFire;844149 wrote:I'm not bringing it in. Just applying the same logic since this place is full of Buckeye fans knowledgeable of the situation. But yet again, Buckeyes can't seem to just discuss something cause I'm a Michigan fan. So I'll try again to please you.

"Unless there are pictures of money swapping hands, there isn't anything anyone can do. These picture don't prove ****."

WebFire;844149 wrote:I'm not bringing it in. Just applying the same logic since this place is full of Buckeye fans knowledgeable of the situation. But yet again, Buckeyes can't seem to just discuss something cause I'm a Michigan fan. So I'll try again to please you.

"Unless there are pictures of money swapping hands, there isn't anything anyone can do. These picture don't prove ****."

sleeper;844178 wrote:There's nothing to discuss other than your obvious bias and hatred for a team that will beat you on the field(ya know, where it matters) for the next 100 years. Remember a couple years ago when you had your BEST season ever? Still were second best, how does that feel? LOL

vball10set;844177 wrote:I'd be happy to discuss anything Buckeye with you at anytime, it's just that you seem to take jabs at Ohio State when it isn't necessary or provoked, like this thread. It's about Alabama, and I don't see where anybody made a reference to any other team--except you...just sayin'

Tiernan;844185 wrote:I love that Lotzy first brought this to our attention...maybe after every other single Top 30 program in the country finally gets sanctioned the Potato Eaters will get back in the hunt?

WebFire;844186 wrote:My apologies. I really wasn't wanting to make it an OSU discussion. It was a comparison of like situations.

Now, let's discuss. Do you see my point about pictures of people signing items is no reason for conviction? That doesn't mean they didn't do it. But it's not against the rules for them to sign things. And it's not against the rules for anyone to sell items with signatures.

vball10set;844223 wrote:Yes I do, but I do believe it IS against the rules to sell items with signatures of players that have eligibilty left--if that's what you're saying here.

WebFire;844233 wrote:Ok, if that's the case I am wrong. So if I go to a game and get Denard's autograph and sell it on Ebay, how can the player get in trouble for that? I don't see how that could be against the rules.

bigkahuna;844245 wrote:I think vball was thinking that you're saying that the players can sell their stuff.

You're right though, as long as the player in question isn't making any money, then it's all good. YOU could sell Denard's autograph, but it'd be illegal if you gave him the money from it.

bigkahuna;844245 wrote:I think vball was thinking that you're saying that the players can sell their stuff.

You're right though, as long as the player in question isn't making any money, then it's all good. YOU could sell Denard's autograph, but it'd be illegal if you gave him the money from it.

WebFire;844255 wrote:Oh yes. I didn't mean the players. I meant for other people to sell the stuff is not against the rules.