LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jul 26, 2011 9:24pm
WebFire;842287 wrote:Apparently you have to read this thread with scarlet colored glasses to see what it's about.
Not really. It's pretty easy to understand the article and the issue. Not sure why you can't get it?
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jul 26, 2011 9:24pm
WebFire;842282 wrote:Wow.
HAHA wow is right--you really can't answer the question!
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jul 26, 2011 9:24pm
SportsAndLady;842292 wrote:Lol why in the hell would we care about.that??? You're completely missing the point...its about one vacated season being listed as vacated and another vacated season not.
You answered your first question with your second sentence. Nice work!
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 26, 2011 9:25pm
SportsAndLady;842292 wrote:Lol why in the hell would we care about.that??? You're completely missing the point...its about one vacated season being listed as vacated and another vacated season not.
I understand that its about the different vacated seasons. Many of you have said that the vacated wins mean exactly dick, so why does it matter what happens with other vacated seasons? They all mean the same whether they are listed on espn.com or not.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jul 26, 2011 9:25pm
SportsAndLady;842297 wrote:HAHA wow is right--you really can't answer the question!
Ok. I'll repeat the "answer" for you.
Vacated wins don't matter, remember? So why the whining?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jul 26, 2011 9:26pm
karen lotz;842300 wrote:I understand that its about the different vacated seasons. Many of you have said that the vacated wins mean exactly dick, so why does it matter what happens with other vacated seasons? They all mean the same whether they are listed on espn.com or not.
But what matters is why report one and not the others?
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jul 26, 2011 9:27pm
Fuck ESPN! They pick on Michigan because they vacated our basketball wins. But they didn't show USC's!!! Bullshit!
BTW, vacated wins don't mean anything. We all know Michigan was the tourney runner up. Can't erase the memories. But burn in hell ESPN for not erasing USC's meaningless vacated wins!! They mean nothing!
BTW, vacated wins don't mean anything. We all know Michigan was the tourney runner up. Can't erase the memories. But burn in hell ESPN for not erasing USC's meaningless vacated wins!! They mean nothing!
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Jul 26, 2011 9:30pm
I don't understand why ESPN having a bias, IF they have a bias, matters at all. Who cares? It's not like they impact anything of any real significance, do they?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jul 26, 2011 9:31pm
lhslep134;842308 wrote:I don't understand why ESPN having a bias, IF they have a bias, matters at all. Who cares? It's not like they impact anything of any real significance, do they?
For me it's more of just a laugh and shake my head kind of thing.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 26, 2011 9:31pm
LJ;842302 wrote:But what matters is why report one and not the others?
They did report that the other teams vacated wins, they didn't update tables on the website from in some cases 6 or 7 seasons ago. If you don't care, why do you care?
They also have OSU on a 6 game winning streak, right? I can only imagine the outrage from Buckeye haters around the country over that error!!!
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jul 26, 2011 9:35pm
karen lotz;842314 wrote:They did report that the other teams vacated wins, they didn't update tables on the website from in some cases 6 or 7 seasons ago. If you don't care, why do you care?
They also have OSU on a 6 game winning streak, right? I can only imagine the outrage from Buckeye haters around the country over that error!!!
So the "Worldwide Leader in Sports" having inaccurate records listed on their informational website is just A-OK with you?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 26, 2011 9:38pm
If it was something that meant more than vacated wins, it wouldn't be. Like everyone has said on here already, people know what happened in everyone of those vacated wins. Send ESPN an email and include the elevenwarriors link.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jul 26, 2011 9:40pm
karen lotz;842325 wrote:If it was something that meant more than vacated wins, it wouldn't be. Like everyone has said on here already, people know what happened in everyone of those vacated wins. Send ESPN an email and include the elevenwarriors link.
So, having inaccurate records is ok with you in this case?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 26, 2011 9:42pm
LJ;842327 wrote:So, having inaccurate records is ok with you in this case?
No! I am outraged!!! :mad:
God damn you are a douche.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jul 26, 2011 9:42pm
karen lotz;842331 wrote:No! I am outraged!!! :mad:
God damn you are a douche.
Thanks for starting the name calling, like normal.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jul 26, 2011 9:42pm
Karen and web spend more time arguing with buckeye fans than they spend time actually following their own teams I think. Do you guys just get off to that or what?
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Jul 26, 2011 9:44pm
LJ;842319 wrote:So the "Worldwide Leader in Sports" having inaccurate records listed on their informational website is just A-OK with you?
Yeah. As an educated sports fan I know those wins were vacated, so who cares?
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jul 26, 2011 9:44pm
SportsAndLady;842334 wrote:Karen and web spend more time arguing with buckeye fans than they spend time actually following their own teams I think. Do you guys just get off to that or what?
False.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 26, 2011 9:45pm
SportsAndLady;842334 wrote:Karen and web spend more time arguing with buckeye fans than they spend time actually following their own teams I think. Do you guys just get off to that or what?
Yeah bro.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jul 26, 2011 9:45pm
lhslep134;842340 wrote:Yeah. As an educated sports fan I know those wins were vacated, so who cares?
I dunno, I would think the "worldwide leader in sports" would have accurate information on their website.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 26, 2011 9:46pm
lhslep134;842340 wrote:Yeah. As an educated sports fan I know those wins were vacated, so who cares?
Why don't LJ or S&L respond to you? They must get off on arguing with non Buckeye fans!
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Jul 26, 2011 9:46pm
LJ;842347 wrote:I dunno, I would think the "worldwide leader in sports" would have accurate information on their website.
Write them an email. I'm sure they will get it taken care of for you.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jul 26, 2011 9:47pm
failkaren lotz;842349 wrote:Why don't LJ or S&L respond to you? They must get off on arguing with non Buckeye fans!
S
sportswizuhrd
Posts: 3,215
Jul 26, 2011 9:48pm
Have you listened to their announcers in the past 5 years?LJ;842319 wrote:So the "Worldwide Leader in Sports" having inaccurate records listed on their informational website is just A-OK with you?
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jul 26, 2011 9:49pm
karen lotz;842349 wrote:Why don't LJ or S&L respond to you? They must get off on arguing with non Buckeye fans!
See post #59 tard