cats gone wild;832018 wrote:LSU is the most picked team by the media, and why shouldnt they? But, it will depend on their matchup's with Oregon and Bama. I wish LSU played a B10 type of schedule where it would be a guarantee to go 13-0 but we gotta play 6 ranked teams a year. Just builds them up to be prepared for a title game though.
Oregon loses alot of linemen and will get beat by double digits by LSU. I still dont see what anyone sees in Oklahoma or FSU. Unless they are a TON better from last year, they are not "very" good. Oklahoma squeaked by nobodies last year in a down B12. And we all know OK's history in BCS games. If OSU wasnt a bunch of paid players and had their coach, this would of been a good year for them.

LSU or Bama will win the title this year, BOOK IT and quote me on it for future reference.

OhioStatePride2003;835738 wrote:Why shouldn't they? Well because by your theory, no one gets better year-to-year. Oklahoma went 12-2 last year, and returns darn near everyone. FSU lost four games last year, but they return almost everyone. LSU - barely got by Tennessee (should've lost), you only beat WVU @ home by six and you go to Morgantown this year - that's a loss. Since 2008 - LSU has 11 losses. By comparison, OU only has 9. FSU has had more dominate years than LSU fans could ever dream and are on their way back to being FSU again.

And why should anyone quote you? You'll simply delete your post, like you did when you said LSU was a squeaky clean program and then renigged on that quote when they got busted. LSU will lose to Oregon, WVU, Tennessee, 'Bama, Florida and Mississippi State - BOOK THAT and quote me for future reference douchebag.

OhioStatePride2003;835738 wrote:Why shouldn't they? Well because by your theory, no one gets better year-to-year. Oklahoma went 12-2 last year, and returns darn near everyone. FSU lost four games last year, but they return almost everyone. LSU - barely got by Tennessee (should've lost), you only beat WVU @ home by six and you go to Morgantown this year - that's a loss. Since 2008 - LSU has 11 losses. By comparison, OU only has 9. FSU has had more dominate years than LSU fans could ever dream and are on their way back to being FSU again.

And why should anyone quote you? You'll simply delete your post, like you did when you said LSU was a squeaky clean program and then renigged on that quote when they got busted. LSU will lose to Oregon, WVU, Tennessee, 'Bama, Florida and Mississippi State - BOOK THAT and quote me for future reference douchebag.

cats gone wild;835893 wrote:I have found out that you are the biggest clown on this site who knows squat. Done responding to your non-sense. Sleeper knows more than you do. Even the girlie sports fans on here (vballset, ccrunner) know more than you........and thats hard to beat.

cats gone wild;835893 wrote:I have found out that you are the biggest clown on this site who knows squat. Done responding to your non-sense. Sleeper knows more than you do. Even the girlie sports fans on here (vballset, ccrunner) know more than you........and thats hard to beat.

cats gone wild;835893 wrote:I have found out that you are the biggest clown on this site who knows squat. Done responding to your non-sense. Sleeper knows more than you do. Even the girlie sports fans on here (vballset, ccrunner) know more than you........and thats hard to beat.

OhioStatePride2003;835738 wrote:Well because by your theory, no one gets better year-to-year. Oklahoma went 12-2 last year, and returns darn near everyone. FSU lost four games last year, but they return almost everyone. LSU - barely got by Tennessee (should've lost), you only beat WVU @ home by six and you go to Morgantown this year - that's a loss.

And why should anyone quote you? You'll simply delete your post, like you did when you said LSU was a squeaky clean program and then renigged on that quote when they got busted. LSU will lose to Oregon, WVU, Tennessee, 'Bama, Florida and Mississippi State - BOOK THAT and quote me for future reference douchebag.

Iliketurtles;835705 wrote:Yes an SEC will not win the national champion this year. I'd put my money on Oklahoma or Florida State.

enigmaax;835976 wrote:I don't remember anything you've posted before, but there are a couple things wrong with this post. You are bitching that cgw thinks "no one gets better", but you're examples are two teams who had at least one completely embarrassing loss, while the team you're downplaying had two .... um, embarrassing wins? LSU lost by a TD to two BCS teams, beat 4 ranked teams (including Alabama, who many people thought were the best team despite their losses and who many have at the top coming into this season), and beat the **** out of one of those teams that beat Oklahoma. I don't think LSU will finish where a few pre-season prognosticators have put them (yes, some have them #1), but you're going to be a much bigger turd if they don't lose close to the six games you just stated. I never understand why people act like others are idiots when no one here is any kind of professional prognosticator.

The other thing is that cats did not delete anything. It took me about five seconds to find his "clean" post. He never used the word "squeaky" and the quote is still there. He even told you what thread and what page. Why say dumb **** that makes you look like a ****tard?



I still think FSU will lose two games, but I have to admit that I would actually like to see them do well. I've followed Virginia Beach football (from afar, mostly - had family there) for about 25 years so I kind of have a soft spot for EJ Manuel. I won't be rooting for them, but I won't mind it if he does well. Obviously, I still hate that FSU and Florida are apparently moving in opposite directions.

OhioStatePride2003;836038 wrote: Also, I never dug around looking for his post saying he was clean, was simply basing it off of the earlier comments by some that said he renigged on his comments about LSU bein' clean. Nice of you to come to his defense though, kinda cute. Never thought I'd be attacked by a duo of butt pirates though, not so cute.

enigmaax;836047 wrote:Ummm...okay. Wasn't attacking you, but you were completely wrong and a total jackass about it. If you're gonna be a ****, at least have your facts right.

OhioStatePride2003;836064 wrote:Aside from him not deleting his post?

enigmaax;836195 wrote:That is what I was talking about. You jumped on that coward-deleted-your-post nonsense even after it had been proven wrong. That is just dumb and it has nothing to do with talking sports.

As for the other stuff, I'm not going to pick apart predictions because none of us know and it is not my thing. You may end up being right, cats may end up being right. The only thing I pointed out is that you didn't support your point very well - what you characterized as cats' logic wasn't his logic at all, so you were off target with that. Then, you didn't support your point very well with the examples you used. Your final result may end up being right, I just don't get how you arrived at it based on what you posted. While you threw out a lot of facts (the number of losses), they are mostly arbitrary and you didn't even compare the same attributes of the teams. For example, what does LSU return? What were the losses that each team suffered - whose were worse and why would those results be any different (besides, "they return a lot of people)? Who did Oklahoma and FSU beat that makes you think they were good or will be better? Those points don't have anything to do with defending cats, btw.

Just for the record, I think Oklahoma and FSU are set up best schedule-wise, relative to their talent, so you and I seem to agree on that. I also think LSU has probably the most talent in the SEC, but I'm not sold on their coach or QB and so I think they'll drop a couple. I also think FSU will drop a couple, but that is just a general feeling based on their last few years (or maybe I'm hoping?).

karen lotz;836226 wrote:Florida had a new coach last year?

OhioStatePride2003;836221 wrote: They squeaked by teams that in all honesty, they were ten times better than: UNC, WVU, Tennessee, Florida... Oklahoma may have played "weaker" competition in the Big 12, but beating UNC (minus a bunch of starters), WVU (Big East?), Tennessee (hasn't been relevant since Peyton), /QUOTE]

Hey enigmaax.....just ignore this idiot. He doesnt know football. Here is another huge mistake by him. "Tenn hasnt been relevant since Peyton".
Sorry pride2003, but uh.........Tennessee won the national championship the year AFTER Peyton left Tenn and have been to 3 SEC title games since the title. This dude needs a huge history lesson.

OhioStatePride2003;836221 wrote: They squeaked by teams that in all honesty, they were ten times better than: UNC, WVU, Tennessee, Florida... Oklahoma may have played "weaker" competition in the Big 12, but beating UNC (minus a bunch of starters), WVU (Big East?), Tennessee (hasn't been relevant since Peyton)

OhioStatePride2003;836221 wrote:Fair enough, but who did LSU beat that makes you (or anyone) believe they'll be good or better? We agree, their coach and QB will cost them at LEAST two games. It appeared to me that he (cgw) was saying that Oklahoma wouldn't be very good this year based on what they did last year. Clearly LSU had a tougher schedule, but lost to teams they really should've beat (Arkansas, and had the 'Bama game). They squeaked by teams that in all honesty, they were ten times better than: UNC, WVU, Tennessee, Florida... Oklahoma may have played "weaker" competition in the Big 12, but beating UNC (minus a bunch of starters), WVU (Big East?), Tennessee (hasn't been relevant since Peyton), and Florida (anticipating a new coach/QB) isn't anything to brag about. Fair?

ts1227;835379 wrote:LOL. There isn't one conference or school that operates on morals. It falls under tradition moreso ("that's not how we used to do it" ) .

I think most conferences expected the NCAA to step in when this practice started in earnest, whenever that was, but it never happened, and here we are.

cats gone wild;836281 wrote:Hey enigmaax.....just ignore this idiot. He doesnt know football.

vball10set;836527 wrote:Irony in it's purest form .... /thread

OhioStatePride2003;836711 wrote: Also, you won't convince me that UNC, Tennessee, WVU, and Florida were relevant in football last year. Even if they were, LSU was hands down better than those teams - and they scraped by. It happens. In no way shape or form did I imply that Oklahoma was even better than LSU last year, but if you're gonna knock Oklahoma for barely beating Cincinnati - LSU barely beating WVU AT home is inexcusable. I'm done with your morons.