thedynasty1998;828639 wrote:Then the previous post is wrong about OSU reporting to the NCAA prior to the Yahoo article.
And who is Tressel's boss? The NCAA or OSU? It's dumb to say OSU couldn't penalize Tressel before turning over to the NCAA. He lied to his bosses and knowingly broke NCAA rules. If anyone in America is caught lying to their bosses like that they are fired on the spot. But God forbid OSU from penalizing him immediately rather than waiting for a National Publication releasing the message and being reactive.
This board really needs a flailing icon. If it had one, I'd be posting it now.
By all accounts, the Board of Trustees initially supported Tressel (barely) and wanted to see how things played out with the investigation. As time progressed, the university kept getting hammered by every media hack this side of the Mississippi River who was looking to make a name for himself and get web hits.
That kind of pressure eventually reaches a boil over point because the Trustees (who have a job of overseeing all aspects of the university, including its good name) don't like how the school is being dragged through the mud. In an effort to stem that tide, they decide to go forward and fire the person most responsible for the problems.
Of course, by this time, there are also enough facts known from the on-going investigation that Ohio State's lawyers can feel comfortable with asking for his resignation, even though he's still under a legal contract. It's the contract that complicates this and makes it unique from most employer-employee situations.
It's also why you don't just "fire someone on the spot" in this case. When OSU did that with O'Brien, it cost the university millions of dollars because they didn't do everything required BY THE CONTRACT for termination.
Understand now?
You really need to let this go. It isn't making you look good.