Division I: Region 2- Season Long chat thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ High School Football ▸ Division I: Region 2- Season Long chat thread
Big Al Carter's avatar

Big Al Carter

Senior Member

431 posts
Sep 22, 2011 6:54 PM
coyotes22;907187 wrote:This coming from a Fed guy?

You wouldnt know competition if it bit you in your big ass.
Weak. I've seen better competition at a cheerleader match.
Sep 22, 2011 6:54pm
coyotes22's avatar

coyotes22

Go Tigers

11,298 posts
Sep 22, 2011 6:59 PM
Big Al Carter;907189 wrote:Weak. I've seen better competition at a cheerleader match.
I dont doubt that you go to those.

Perv.

I mean, if my high school football team sucked, Id prolly go too.
Sep 22, 2011 6:59pm
McKAlumni07's avatar

McKAlumni07

Senior Member

292 posts
Sep 28, 2011 10:49 PM
Rank W-L ID # City School Average Level 1 Level 2 L2 divisor
1 5-0 650 Canton GlenOak 12.0000 29.5 61.0 100
2 5-0 586 Findlay Findlay 10.7500 28.5 50.5 100
3 5-0 268 Brunswick Brunswick 10.4000 29.0 46.0 100
4 5-0 1704 Toledo Whitmer 10.3237 28.5 43.0 93
5 4-1 306 Canton Canton McKinley 9.9020 23.5 51.5 99
6 3-2 764 Massillon Jackson 9.7000 17.5 62.0 100
7 5-0 1606 Wadsworth Wadsworth 9.4000 28.0 38.0 100
8 4-1 1360 Toledo St John's Jesuit 8.7876 21.0 44.5 97
9 4-1 1152 North Ridgeville North Ridgeville 8.7000 22.0 43.0 100
10 4-1 1624 Massillon Massillon Washington 8.1889 21.5 38.5 99
11 4-1 1512 Sylvania Sylvania Southview 8.0500 21.5 37.5 100
12 4-1 740 Hudson Hudson 7.9500 23.0 33.5 100
13 4-1 670 Green Green 7.7000 22.5 32.0 100
From joe eitel this is the regions standings after 5 weeks.. i have no clue how Jackson still deserves to be that high but oh well.
Sep 28, 2011 10:49pm
rmolin73's avatar

rmolin73

Senior Member

4,278 posts
Sep 29, 2011 1:30 AM
MckAlumni07 it's because of early wins.
Sep 29, 2011 1:30am
McKAlumni07's avatar

McKAlumni07

Senior Member

292 posts
Sep 29, 2011 12:21 PM
Ok my bad let me rephrase that... I know why they are up at 6 what I really meant wS they don't deserve to be that is all
Sep 29, 2011 12:21pm
G

Gardens35

Senior Member

4,929 posts
Sep 30, 2011 10:37 PM
Fitch is 0-3 in R2 so far, but if Canada is R2 they're 1-3.
Sep 30, 2011 10:37pm
coyotes22's avatar

coyotes22

Go Tigers

11,298 posts
Sep 30, 2011 10:54 PM
Gardens35;917798 wrote:Fitch is 0-3 in R2 so far, but if Canada is R2 they're 1-3.
WTH happened man?!?!?!
Sep 30, 2011 10:54pm
G

Gardens35

Senior Member

4,929 posts
Sep 30, 2011 11:28 PM
coyotes22;917817 wrote:WTH happened man?!?!?!
Tonight, or weeks 2,3,4,5?
Sep 30, 2011 11:28pm
grodt's avatar

grodt

Senior Member

1,588 posts
Oct 6, 2011 10:32 PM
1. Glenoak 33.55 10-0
2. Whitmer 32.53317 10-0
3. Wadsworth 30.8 10-0
4. Hudson 28.4 9-1
5. Southview 28.35 9-1
6. Jackson 27.25 8-2
7. McKinley 27.0732 8-2
8. Findlay 25.3 9-1 (Whitmer)
9. Anthony Wayne 25.0 8-2 (Southview)
10. Avon Lake 22.95 8-2
11. Brunswick 22.1 7-3 (Solon)
12. St. Johns 19.6608 8-2 (Findlay)
13. N. Ridgeville 19.35 8-2 (Midview)
14. Massillon 19.045 7-3 (Steubenville, McKinley)
15. Lorain 17.0919 5-5 (Bedford, Maple Heights)
16. Green 16.6 7-3 (Copley)
17. Elyria 16.5 8-2 (Hudson


Just for fun I've used a computer program (and calpreps) to predict how the region is going to play out the rest of the way. Of course any upsets will skew this but I figured it'd be something fun to look at a few weeks away from playoff time. For each of the teams above I list their predicted final average, final record and which teams I have them losing too.

Let the debating begin.
Oct 6, 2011 10:32pm
rmolin73's avatar

rmolin73

Senior Member

4,278 posts
Oct 7, 2011 3:13 AM
I think Hudson will lose to Elyria and possibly North Royalton. Brunswick just lost to Twinsburg but you don't have them making it anyway.
Oct 7, 2011 3:13am
grodt's avatar

grodt

Senior Member

1,588 posts
Oct 7, 2011 10:23 AM
I had already figured Brunswicks loss in calculations. I didn't include Twinsburg at first because they were sitting at 19 after week 6. Even with their win over Brunswick they're still a long-shot to make the playoffs.
Oct 7, 2011 10:23am
coyotes22's avatar

coyotes22

Go Tigers

11,298 posts
Oct 9, 2011 1:29 PM
Rank W-L ID # City School Average Level 1 Level 2 L2 divisor
1 7-0 650 Canton GlenOak 20.4571 41.0 146.0 100
2 7-0 1704 Toledo Whitmer 16.9508 40.0 104.5 93
3 7-0 1606 Wadsworth Wadsworth 16.4429 39.5 108.0 100
4 6-1 1512 Sylvania Sylvania Southview 15.5429 32.5 109.0 100
5 6-1 586 Findlay Findlay 14.2571 34.0 94.0 100
6 6-1 740 Hudson Hudson 13.9500 35.0 89.5 100
7 6-1 1624 Massillon Massillon Washington 13.4898 30.5 89.5 98
8 4-3 764 Massillon Jackson 13.4571 23.5 101.0 100
9 5-2 306 Canton Canton McKinley 13.4567 29.5 91.5 99
10 6-1 124 Whitehouse Anthony Wayne 13.0714 32.0 85.0 100
Oct 9, 2011 1:29pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Oct 9, 2011 9:29 PM
I only get to see the Toledo teams play on a consistent basis. But Whitmer is going to rolllllll through this region imo. First time in...ever really....that I think a Toledo team has a legit shot versus Region I (Mentor, St Eds this year). No one can block Chris Wormley.
Oct 9, 2011 9:29pm
grodt's avatar

grodt

Senior Member

1,588 posts
Oct 9, 2011 10:42 PM
I really want to get a chance to go see Whitmer at some point. I think Glenoak/Whitmer would be a good game.
Oct 9, 2011 10:42pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Oct 12, 2011 4:29 AM
Whitmer plays a tough 4-2 Fremont Ross squad this week, a team who has given Whitmer a lot of trouble in the past, including last season when they beat them 22-16.

In fact, Ross beat Whitmer 49-35 in 2009 and 34-14 in 2008 as well, if I'm not mistaken.
Oct 12, 2011 4:29am
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Oct 12, 2011 1:09 PM
hoops23;931022 wrote:Whitmer plays a tough 4-2 Fremont Ross squad this week, a team who has given Whitmer a lot of trouble in the past, including last season when they beat them 22-16.

In fact, Ross beat Whitmer 49-35 in 2009 and 34-14 in 2008 as well, if I'm not mistaken.
Ill back up my statement and go bold in this one.

Whitmer by 21+.
Oct 12, 2011 1:09pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Oct 13, 2011 4:31 AM
Laley23;931355 wrote:Ill back up my statement and go bold in this one.

Whitmer by 21+.
I'll back up your statement and agree LOL.

I was just saying though...
Oct 13, 2011 4:31am
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Oct 13, 2011 10:56 AM
hoops23;932105 wrote:I'll back up your statement and agree LOL.

I was just saying though...
Yeah, I mean they are tough. But Whitmer is at another level this year. They are at another level even from last year. Wormley DOMINATED St. Johns and they were up 35-7 in that game before they kind of let up the gas offensively. Id expect the same on Friday. Their defense is just relentless. Wormley anchors it, but they have secondary and LBers that are going to play college ball. The addition of Leroy Alexander was a huge pick-up.
Oct 13, 2011 10:56am
coyotes22's avatar

coyotes22

Go Tigers

11,298 posts
Oct 14, 2011 10:24 PM
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 14th
*McKinley - 41 Hoover - 0 = Final
GlenOak - 14 *Boardman - 17 = Final
*Jackson - 31 Lake - 28 = Final
*Fitch - 38 Perry - 7 = Final

Thursday, October 13th

Warren Harding - 7 *Massillon - 24 = Final
Oct 14, 2011 10:24pm
McKAlumni07's avatar

McKAlumni07

Senior Member

292 posts
Oct 14, 2011 10:39 PM
coyotes22;933740 wrote:
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 14th
*McKinley - 41 Hoover - 0 = Final
GlenOak - 14 *Boardman - 17 = Final
*Jackson - 31 Lake - 28 = Final
*Fitch - 38 Perry - 7 = Final

Thursday, October 13th

Warren Harding - 7 *Massillon - 24 = Final
Wadsworth took Loss #1 tonight too
Oct 14, 2011 10:39pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Oct 15, 2011 12:50 AM
Whitmer 58 - 20 Fremont Ross

I didnt give Whitmer enough credit. They easily covered my 21+ prediction. As I said, Id be stunned if they didnt cruise to this title. I doubt they will be challenged till Semis versus Mentor/Eds.
Oct 15, 2011 12:50am
rmolin73's avatar

rmolin73

Senior Member

4,278 posts
Oct 15, 2011 5:41 AM
Whitmer is rolling that game wasn't even that close. They are just dominating every team in their path.
Oct 15, 2011 5:41am
coyotes22's avatar

coyotes22

Go Tigers

11,298 posts
Oct 15, 2011 3:51 PM
As it stands right now:
1 7-1 650 Canton GlenOak 22.0750 41.0 169.5 100 . 32.3000 26.7500 28.9500 22.2000 100
2 7-1 1512 Sylvania Sylvania Southview 21.7125 38.5 169.0 100 . 30.2500 27.7500 26.4000 22.9000 100
3 8-0 1704 Toledo Whitmer 21.1176 45.5 143.5 93 control own destiny 33.2306 28.9296 27.8833 22.3995 93
4 7-1 740 Hudson Hudson 17.6250 41.0 125.0 100 . 31.1000 26.5500 23.5500 17.8000 100
5 7-1 1606 Wadsworth Wadsworth 17.2875 39.5 123.5 100 . 28.0500 23.6000 22.9500 17.4000 100
6 5-3 764 Massillon Jackson 16.6750 29.0 130.5 100 . 25.5500 19.8500 21.0000 16.5000 100
7 7-1 586 Findlay Findlay 16.6375 39.5 117.0 100 . 29.5500 25.0000 22.4000 16.7500 100
8 7-1 1624 Massillon Massillon Washington 16.6244 36.5 117.0 97 . 33.3582 25.4201 23.1861 16.2273 97
9 6-2 306 Canton Canton McKinley 16.0032 35.5 114.5 99 . 29.3460 25.8611 20.4692 16.8833 99
10 7-1 1152 North Ridgeville North Ridgeville 15.6125 36.5 110.5 100 . 26.3500 21.8000 20.7000 16.2500 100
Oct 15, 2011 3:51pm
coyotes22's avatar

coyotes22

Go Tigers

11,298 posts
Oct 16, 2011 10:55 AM
(unofficial) max Avg
(win out)		 min Avg
(win out)		 max Avg
(lose out)		 min Avg
(lose out)		 L2 divisor
(final)
1 7-1 650 Canton GlenOak 23.1750 41.0 180.5 100 . 32.3000 27.8500 28.9500 23.3000 100
2 7-1 1512 Sylvania Sylvania Southview 21.7125 38.5 169.0 100 . 30.2500 27.7500 26.4000 22.9000 100
3 8-0 1704 Toledo Whitmer 21.7090 45.5 149.0 93 control own destiny 33.2306 29.5210 27.8833 22.9909 93
4 7-1 740 Hudson Hudson 17.6250 41.0 125.0 100 . 31.1000 26.5500 23.5500 17.8000 100
5 7-1 1606 Wadsworth Wadsworth 17.2875 39.5 123.5 100 . 28.0500 23.6000 22.9500 17.4000 100
6 7-1 1624 Massillon Massillon Washington 17.1398 36.5 122.0 97 . 33.3582 25.9356 23.1861 16.7428 97
7 5-3 764 Massillon Jackson 16.6750 29.0 130.5 100 . 25.5500 19.8500 21.0000 16.5000 100
8 7-1 586 Findlay Findlay 16.6375 39.5 117.0 100 . 29.5500 25.0000 22.4000 16.7500 100
9 6-2 306 Canton Canton McKinley 16.0032 35.5 114.5 99 . 29.3460 25.8611 20.4692 16.8833 99
10 7-1 1152 North Ridgeville North Ridgeville 15.6125 36.5 110.5 100 . 26.3500 21.8000 20.7000 16.2500 100
Oct 16, 2011 10:55am