sleeper;807909 wrote:But enough about the Big Ten/SEC "debate", my team is good year in year out, I don't have to root for a conference to be relevant every year.

queencitybuckeye;807874 wrote:The last stat is highly arguable. You aren't trying to claim that the NCAA is the sole arbiter of that, are you? Bowling Green, arguable. Utah? Disgraceful.

Speedofsand;807960 wrote:hey sleeper, where are all the big10 teams in the college baseball world series?

Speedofsand;807960 wrote:hey sleeper, where are all the big10 teams in the college baseball world series?

enigmaax;807927 wrote:Not while all of the teams were actually members of the respective conference. Bad try.



Actually, it basically has two. Nebraska has 0 wins while part of the little ten (twelve) and Penn State won what, 700 games before it joined?
Of course, that argument actually supports the SEC-is-best side anyway. Obviously when you have only two decent teams and a bunch of creampuffs those two programs are going to win a lot of games. When you expand the list a little bit, you see that the SEC has 6 teams in the top 16 (by %, because raw wins only mean you were playing longer). Every year the SEC has multiple games against top notch programs, not just one rivalry that determines who is better after beating 10 or 11 nobodies. Equally telling is that the biggie smalls conference has two of the worst 8 programs in the country.




Aw, #uck...you got me. I'll keep that in mind next time I'm watching #1 national recruit, Terrelle "Everybody Kills People" Pryor represent the University of Ohio State in the god damn NCAA Super Genius Quiz Bowl.

Speedofsand;807960 wrote:hey sleeper, where are all the big10 teams in the college baseball world series?

enigmaax;807957 wrote:I don't have to live vicariously through strangers who play a game to be relevant in life.

LJ;808025 wrote:Because this is the college baseball forum?

And you have the nerve to call people trolls SMH

Speedofsand;808223 wrote:there is no college baseball forum here, so I can't ask a question? some of you buckeyes sure get your panties in a wad quick.

lhslep134;808005 wrote:I know you're trying to jump on sleeper, but how the hell is that relevant to college football?

sleeper;808192 wrote:Neither do I. I just like to turn on the TV every saturday and watch the greatest University pound the **** out of the opposing team week in week out and then go get their asses handed to them when they play an top 3 SEC team in a bowl game making us not worthy of an all time top 3 program in the country.

Florida has kicked our ass so much in this decade they even doubled up on us in basketball and football one year.

rmolin73;808229 wrote:Fixed it for you.

enigmaax;807420 wrote:I'm not really sure what you're getting at. Those who weren't busted don't really matter. The fact is that in the most recent case, he knew about it, lied, and covered it up. I don't know why you wouldn't expect that to raise doubts about how much he knew or what else he lied about in at least 3 other high-profile cases in which one of his top players committed the same "crime". I know you are way smarter than to not know the difference between Mike Nugent and Maurice Clarett/Elite Quarterbacks.

sleeper;808231 wrote:Didn't they just beat Arkansas? A top 3 SEC team? We'll keep winning, Florida will be a mediocre team for a while, just like they always have been.

enigmaax;807477 wrote:Okay, I'll take that. I overstated the quantity. But arguing that minor point in the statement is just eluding the real issue.

None of the guys on your list are national championship quarterbacks (go ahead, throw out Craig Krenzel). None of the guys on your list are the single biggest RB recruit in the coach's tenure. None of the guys on your list are Heisman winners. None of the guys on your list were the #1 high school recruit in the country. If you don't recognize how those guys are different from the average "star" and the fact that four people at that level is way too many to be coincidence, I can't help you either.

I don't even know what your point is anymore - it started with your belief that Ray Isaac's statement that Tressel didn't know anything must be fact. There's only one case where we know for a fact that Tressel knew anything about it. And we also know for a fact that he lied several times about knowing anything. So, that casts doubt on whether or not he told the truth in 3 other cases, regardless of how many non-cases there were.

sleeper;807496 wrote:And none of these guys were a 2 time National Champion and Heisman winner...

http://www.fanblogs.com/florida/006490.php
http://thewizardofodds.blogspot.com/2008/01/tebow-possibly-implicated-in-moore-mess.html
http://dscriber.com/sports/crocsgate-tim-tebow-and-potential-endorsement-violations

Speedofsand;808252 wrote:LMAO, there is nothing here. A couple of "possible" conversations between athletes? A photo posted by a company that Tebow had nothing to do with? That's all you got?!

Speedofsand;808247 wrote:yes, they just BARELY beat Arkansas, 3rd best in the SEC West, in a down year for the SEC.
5 straight National Championships

sleeper;808259 wrote:Another SEC tactic, excuses. Last time I check Arkansas was the other team from the SEC to get a BCS game, they were the second best team in the conference.

rmolin73;808260 wrote:And cars, drugs etc. Once again

Speedofsand;808263 wrote:2010
SEC West

1.Auburn
2.LSU
3.Arkansas
4.Alabama
5.Miss St
6.Ol Miss

http://www.secfootball.itgo.com/scores.html

Pwned you