jordo212000;803306 wrote:again... Ohio State is sponsored by Nike too. I'm not sure why we keep using that as an argument. Sure, Oregon is Nike's guinea pig, but Ohio State draws far more water to Nike than Oregon ever will. (Merchandise sales, exposure of brand, etc)
There isn't much more "exposure of brand" than Phil Knight and his 4,000 different uniform combinations for Oregon sports every year. Or how about that ugly ass basketball court? Who do you think pays for everything around there? Phil Knight. And when I think Phil Knight, I think Nike. When I think Oregon, I think Nike. When I think OSU, USC, Florida, etc. I don't think of their sponsor, I think of conference titles, national championships, etc. Oregon and Nike go hand in hand. Phil Knight has a LOT of money. If he could pay off someone to spare his school the spotlight, I dunno if he'd could or would. But like stated before, who sponsors who - who's an alumni where - who has more money - isn't going to factor in on what the NCAA does. Oregon, to me, is a one year wonder. They don't drive in the money like OSU, USC, Florida. It's kind of like a "What have you done for me lately?" type thing. What has Oregon done for College Football? Other than play in the "Scandal Bowl" this past year? And let (potentially) the biggest fraud - Cam Newton - and a dirtier program, win a National Championship?