FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Jun 3, 2011 11:09am
Writerbuckeye;789926 wrote:Pryor's attorney has shown paperwork for his car purchase and says 3 or 4 other cars were loaners because of car problems with two other used vehicles that Pryor has used during his time at OSU.
It will be interesting to see if that all proves to be true. If it does, then Pryor will have been vilified unmercifully by several media about driving different cars when there is a perfectly logical -- and legal -- explanation.
http://blog.pennlive.com/patriotnewssports/2011/06/theres_a_misperception_about_o.html
Won't it be interesting if it turns out Pryor wasn't the villain in all of this?
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jun 3, 2011 11:11am
LJ;789930 wrote:Would you lie to your father and let him make an ass of himself publicly and spend money on a lawyer? If so, maybe that explains your stance. Maybe my morals are just higher and I like to believe that because I do it myself that a polite young man that I have met a few times would also have those same morals.
I guess not every teenager has your morals. :rolleyes:
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jun 3, 2011 11:12am
LJ;789930 wrote:Would you lie to your father and let him make an ass of himself publicly and spend money on a lawyer? If so, maybe that explains your stance. Maybe my morals are just higher and I like to believe that because I do it myself that a polite young man that I have met a few times would also have those same morals.
You must also realize I am not saying he is guilty at all, but rather than it is possible. That is all.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jun 3, 2011 11:14am
He's an adult, I would hope he would have that much respect for his father. I see your skepticism is on a personal level. Carry on.WebFire;789940 wrote:I guess not every teenager has your morals. :rolleyes:
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jun 3, 2011 11:15am
and that is not an attack
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jun 3, 2011 11:16am
LJ;789946 wrote:and that is not an attack
Of course it isn't.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jun 3, 2011 11:17am
LJ;789945 wrote:He's an adult, I would hope he would have that much respect for his father. I see your skepticism is on a personal level. Carry on.
So are they adults or kids? I think I've seen many a Buckeye argument about them being kids.
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Jun 3, 2011 11:17am
Hey dad go blow $$$ and commit perjury for me please.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jun 3, 2011 11:18am
WebFire;789952 wrote:Of course it isn't.
It's not, I just don't understand where the skepticism this deep comes from on a matter that could not only financially ruin a family but make them look like fools publicly.
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Jun 3, 2011 11:18am
LJ;789930 wrote:Would you lie to your father and let him make an ass of himself publicly and spend money on a lawyer? If so, maybe that explains your stance. Maybe my morals are just higher and I like to believe that because I do it myself that a polite young man that I have met a few times would also have those same morals.
I wouldn't do that to my dad. But the one thing I have learned from this situation is that even the people that appear to be completely moral and ethical and that "do things the right way" are capable of lying to protect themselves and their best interest.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jun 3, 2011 11:18am
LJ;789945 wrote:He's an adult, I would hope he would have that much respect for his father. I see your skepticism is on a personal level. Carry on.
So you don't think it's even remotely possible that a college age kids tries to cover this up if it can be done? If so, you are very, very naive.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jun 3, 2011 11:18am
WebFire;789953 wrote:So are they adults or kids? I think I've seen many a Buckeye argument about them being kids.
They are adults who have unrealistic ideas of grandeur
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jun 3, 2011 11:19am
sherm03;789957 wrote:I wouldn't do that to my dad. But the one thing I have learned from this situation is that even the people that appear to be completely moral and ethical and that "do things the right way" are capable of lying to protect themselves and their best interest.
Stop with you logic. It doesn't work with LJ.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jun 3, 2011 11:19am
WebFire;789958 wrote:So you don't think it's even remotely possible that a college age kids tries to cover this up if it can be done? If so, you are very, very naive.
I don't have the level of skepticism that you show, not nearly.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jun 3, 2011 11:20am
sherm03;789957 wrote:I wouldn't do that to my dad. But the one thing I have learned from this situation is that even the people that appear to be completely moral and ethical and that "do things the right way" are capable of lying to protect themselves and their best interest.
This is true, BUT, the time, money and effort being put into this it's time to error on the side of the Klein family.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Jun 3, 2011 11:20am
WebFire;789953 wrote:So are they adults or kids? I think I've seen many a Buckeye argument about them being kids.
Legally, they're adults. Does that mean that one should expect their decision-making to be on the same level as someone in their later 20s, 30s, 40s, etc? Not unless you want to be disappointed. Mine wasn't. Yours likely wasn't.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jun 3, 2011 11:22am
LJ;789963 wrote:This is true, BUT, the time, money and effort being put into this it's time to error on the side of the Klein family.
So did you error on the side of Tressel because of time, money and effort by OSU?
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Jun 3, 2011 11:55am
Since John Simon's father has also come out and said the article is completely false, perhaps those players named by SI should pool their resources and sue as a group.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jun 3, 2011 11:55am
WebFire;789966 wrote:So did you error on the side of Tressel because of time, money and effort by OSU?
When he admitted to it?
athlete37
Posts: 992
Jun 3, 2011 12:00pm
sleeper;789632 wrote:Yeah, if I wrote an article I'd have more credibility than the author of the SI article. Anyone can start rumors is my point, and its hilarious how things come out of nowhere and rumors start becoming the "truth".
Difference being you don't have a Pulitzer Prize and a degree from a top 20 University....
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Jun 3, 2011 12:02pm
athlete37;790017 wrote:Difference being you don't have a Pulitzer Prize and a degree from a top 20 University....
All of which is meaningless if you write stories that have no proof and use sources that have criminal records and aren't considered credible.
athlete37
Posts: 992
Jun 3, 2011 12:04pm
Writerbuckeye;790019 wrote:All of which is meaningless if you write stories that have no proof and use sources that have criminal records and aren't considered credible.
You realize Tressel retired after he and Ohio State got wind of this article?? It was passed along to them before it was published and was to be published the day after Memorial Day... Hence why Tressel retired Memorial Day before it came out. Actions speak volumes
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Jun 3, 2011 12:04pm
athlete37;790017 wrote:Difference being you don't have a Pulitzer Prize and a degree from a top 20 University....
A second-tier university.
athlete37
Posts: 992
Jun 3, 2011 12:06pm
And also, feel free to pool your resources. A suit based on this article will be dismissed persuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Jun 3, 2011 12:09pm
athlete37;790017 wrote:Difference being you don't have a Pulitzer Prize and a degree from a top 20 University....
I've attended two better schools, so by your logic, me > you. Which happens to be true, but not for that reason alone.