sherm03;789877 wrote:Why is your version reality? Maybe the reality is...
"Son, I read the article. Is this true?"
"No dad, I swear!"
"Good."
Later...
"Honey, he says he didn't do anything. Call the lawyer."

Writerbuckeye;789879 wrote:
In the end, I'll be very surprised if any of it ends up being true.

LJ;789881 wrote:I've met Storm and his father, I HIGHLY doubt that he would ask his son like that then just later decide to make a public statement. They are highly private people and most likely decided to do it together.

LJ;789874 wrote:what? His dad already made a public statement and has hired a lawyer...

I think you are confused.

WebFire;789886 wrote:Can you post his dad's statement? I don't think it said what you typed.

I have raised my son right," Jason Klein stressed Thursday evening. "Storm has no tattoos on his body whatsoever. He doesn't have a drug problem, and multiple tests prove that. I have every single bit of his Ohio State memorabilia in my possession."


"I will be meeting with attorneys shortly to pursue action against the NCAA and Sports Illustrated," he continued. "That's all I have to say at this time."

WebFire;789884 wrote:So let me take the LJ stance on this...

Show me proof or GTFO!

thedynasty1998;789896 wrote:Are we really pretending to know why Storms conversation with his dad was like?

thedynasty1998;789896 wrote:Are we really pretending to know why Storms conversation with his dad was like?

LJ;789899 wrote:no. It was an example of the situation. Glad to see you, webbie and Sherm can't understand that. It's pretty simple, seeing as how Webbie is the one that started with the whole conversation thing.

LJ;789891 wrote:Show you proof of what? That they discussed whether he did it or not, then made a public statement then hired an attorney? Isn't that what this is about?!

WebFire;789905 wrote:And you refuted with your version being "reality" But you don't know anymore than the rest of us. That's what this is about.

karen lotz;789906 wrote:I'm impressed that LJ knows all of these people involved and is getting all this good info.

WebFire;789908 wrote:His dad's statement in know way gives an indication of how his conversation with his son went.

LJ;789910 wrote:I said that is the sitation. You presented the sitatuion as if little johnny broke a window. This is a little more serious than that and has taken a lighty more serious turn than that

LJ;789913 wrote:His dad's statement shows that they have not taken it past the level that is YOUR reality? Please....

WebFire;789914 wrote:No, you said yours was reality and no way my version happened.

Truth is, I don't know what happened. I didn't start "the whole conversation thing", I was merely pointing out that it's not farfetched that a college kid would deny this to his parents.

WebFire;789917 wrote:Your reality isn't even that different. Can you have an opinion without it being the ONLY opinion allowed?

LJ;789920 wrote:Then accept that this situation is more serious than you keep playing it off to be

Writerbuckeye;789926 wrote:Pryor's attorney has shown paperwork for his car purchase and says 3 or 4 other cars were loaners because of car problems with two other used vehicles that Pryor has used during his time at OSU.

It will be interesting to see if that all proves to be true. If it does, then Pryor will have been vilified unmercifully by several media about driving different cars when there is a perfectly logical -- and legal -- explanation.

http://blog.pennlive.com/patriotnewssports/2011/06/theres_a_misperception_about_o.html

WebFire;789927 wrote:Haha, ok.

My new stance because LJ says so... "There is no way a college kid would tell his parents he is innocent when he may not be. This situation is too serious for those shenanigans. I mean, really, why would a KID want to deny something that could hurt him, especially if it would be hard to prove and daddy would get a lawyer to protect me."

WebFire;789928 wrote:But then why did he sell stuff to support his poor mom if she can buy these kinds of cars for him? See where that leads to?