ytownfootball;785850 wrote:Over an 8 year span? Not really as bad as you're making it sound.
9 more on the current team than was originally reported. Smith said they investigated and found no other violations. Spin it how you will.
ytownfootball;785850 wrote:Over an 8 year span? Not really as bad as you're making it sound.
WebFire;785856 wrote:18 in the last 4 though, and that could be bad.
2quik4u;785858 wrote:Tressel has lied to them on 3 separate occasions about this, the NCAA will likely conclude that Tressel knew about this for years. This all makes it a systemic problem, which by definition is a lack of institutional control.
jordo212000;785861 wrote:Yeah of all of the info, this has me the most troubled. I wonder if this could lead to a "lack of institutional control" tag? That's a pretty big number
ytownfootball;785868 wrote:Don't you think the severity of the infraction and the university self reporting will have any bearing on their punishment? Good Lord
sherm03;785872 wrote:The worst part of that article was seeing John Simon's name mentioned. If it's true he was trading memorabilia for tats or money, I'm going to be really disappointed in the kid.
Thought I referenced the number of players involved and the time frame...could be wrong though...karen lotz;785873 wrote:The severity of the 10.1 violation? That is about as bad as it gets in the NCAA's eyes.
I don't think anyone said, other than Gibby, that it would.ytownfootball;785876 wrote:Thought I referenced the number of players involved and the time frame...could be wrong though...
nope, I was right
10.1 will certainly not warrant LOIC in and of itself.
karen lotz;785878 wrote:I don't think anyone said, other than Gibby, that it would.
Midstate01;785885 wrote:Only the people who don't understand the 10.1, or the usual punishments for it, think they are gonna lose scholies. The university said they were the only players they knew of doing it. And I doubt they were gonna go interview every player from the last 8 years. This article is a waste. If osu is to lose scholarships, it'll come from something else. Not the 10.1.
Don't YOU think that after the investigation went down that these nine got together and said "Yo maybe we better let 'em know we got some too."?karen lotz;785886 wrote:Could be true, but don't you think they talked to any other players on the current team? 9 additional players out of the 79 other scholarship players and they just happened to not investigate any of them?
ytownfootball;785890 wrote:Don't YOU think that after the investigation went down that these nine got together and said "Yo maybe we better let 'em know we got some too."?
Spock you ain't lolkaren lotz;785894 wrote:Umm no?
karen lotz;785886 wrote:Could be true, but don't you think they talked to any other players on the current team? 9 additional players out of the 79 other scholarship players and they just happened to not investigate any of them?
ytownfootball;785895 wrote:Spock you ain't lol
Ty Webb;785755 wrote:It's truly amazing how you guys are ok with amount of rule and law breaking that went on here
Writerbuckeye;785775 wrote:Again -- already known. Nothing new here. Just a rehash of what we already knew.
I just don't see how any of this rises to LOIC. It's not even close to the amount of crap USC pulled. Then factor in USC not cooperating for something like three years.
If the NCAA hits OSU as hard as USC over this, they'll never have another university self reporting major violations again.