data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="bases_loaded's avatar"
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Feb 7, 2012 4:19pm
What's wrong with Rick? He doesn't like Muslims?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe3d5/fe3d5e1c1793efdfc25f8d449187c8727d3d59de" alt="fish82's avatar"
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Feb 7, 2012 5:23pm
He's a pure social conservative. His schtick is stuck in the 90s...his message wouldn't get far in today's climate.bases_loaded;1078738 wrote:What's wrong with Rick? He doesn't like Muslims?
S
sjmvsfscs08
Posts: 2,963
Feb 7, 2012 5:33pm
If you can't win a Sentorial election, how can you be expected to win a Presidential election against a billion-dollar warchest?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="bases_loaded's avatar"
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Feb 7, 2012 5:49pm
He's going to have 2 or 3 more wins than Ron Paul by the time it hits Ohio. Someone must like him
S
sjmvsfscs08
Posts: 2,963
Feb 7, 2012 5:59pm
There are a lot of morons out there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05882/058829be9652656b7c775c37d17acd48a7eb9b25" alt="sleeper's avatar"
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Feb 7, 2012 6:27pm
We call them "Romney supporters".sjmvsfscs08;1078805 wrote:There are a lot of morons out there.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee697/ee697dcb2009d77d4bd2162d3abe0d37dcebec8b" alt="Cleveland Buck's avatar"
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 7, 2012 6:56pm
[video=youtube;4FiFVestIiU][/video]
Someone finally got through to Ron on how to deliver his foreign policy message.
Someone finally got through to Ron on how to deliver his foreign policy message.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee697/ee697dcb2009d77d4bd2162d3abe0d37dcebec8b" alt="Cleveland Buck's avatar"
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 7, 2012 6:59pm
He's a big spender who voted for bailing out the airlines and No Child Left Behind and Medicare Part D. He wants a new war on every inch of this earth. He wants the government involved in every decision we make in our lives. People just don't know this about him because he hasn't been vetted by the media or the other candidates.bases_loaded;1078738 wrote:What's wrong with Rick? He doesn't like Muslims?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe3d5/fe3d5e1c1793efdfc25f8d449187c8727d3d59de" alt="fish82's avatar"
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Feb 7, 2012 7:25pm
Better. Not great, but definitely better.Cleveland Buck;1078844 wrote:[video=youtube;4FiFVestIiU][/video]
Someone finally got through to Ron on how to deliver his foreign policy message.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29486/29486090ee0689a46c6d3e27f93dbcab7e0212a9" alt="majorspark's avatar"
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Feb 7, 2012 8:19pm
He was spot on with the civil war in Syria. Let them duke it out. The world was content to let us duke it out during our civil war and the cost in human lives was far greater.Cleveland Buck;1078844 wrote:Someone finally got through to Ron on how to deliver his foreign policy message.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1eccb/1eccba6c772143b85b44eaea2e0460b6490f8072" alt="HitsRus's avatar"
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
Feb 7, 2012 8:39pm
Yeah, better. I'm not sure if it's doable( staying out of these kinds of things.) I liked less his "Egypt" response...which seemed like a "blame Bush" or blame our predecessor type response. Give him a little bit of a drawl and it could have passed for Jimmy Carter.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee697/ee697dcb2009d77d4bd2162d3abe0d37dcebec8b" alt="Cleveland Buck's avatar"
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 7, 2012 8:42pm
Bush? He said we propped up Mubarak for 40 years. And he was right. Why do you think the Egyptians hate us? Because we're rich and free?HitsRus;1078941 wrote:Yeah, better. I'm not sure if it's doable( staying out of these kinds of things.) I liked less his "Egypt" response...which seemed like a "blame Bush" or blame our predecessor type response. Give him a little bit of a drawl and it could have passed for Jimmy Carter.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1eccb/1eccba6c772143b85b44eaea2e0460b6490f8072" alt="HitsRus's avatar"
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
Feb 7, 2012 9:24pm
That's what I'm saying ...let's blame the last 60 years of foreign policy. It's so simple. We are guilty, we are guilty we are so guilty.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7846/b7846111ee0c3d2960dd916ef1d6fb42e9628705" alt="jhay78's avatar"
jhay78
Posts: 1,917
Feb 7, 2012 9:54pm
sjmvsfscs08;1078793 wrote:If you can't win a Sentorial election, how can you be expected to win a Presidential election against a billion-dollar warchest?
Sincerely,
Mitt Romney getting trounced by Ted Kennedy in 1994.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7baf0/7baf08af4e9899dc4ddc7784680e8290f472a0ca" alt="pmoney25's avatar"
pmoney25
Posts: 1,787
Feb 7, 2012 10:05pm
Looks like Santorum is going to have a good night. Have you ever met anyone who supports Santorum? Im serious cause I havent.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29486/29486090ee0689a46c6d3e27f93dbcab7e0212a9" alt="majorspark's avatar"
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Feb 7, 2012 10:23pm
Actually yes. But that would be anecdotal. Obviously there is a lot of supporters for Santorum out there tonight.pmoney25;1079089 wrote:Looks like Santorum is going to have a good night. Have you ever met anyone who supports Santorum? Im serious cause I havent.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee697/ee697dcb2009d77d4bd2162d3abe0d37dcebec8b" alt="Cleveland Buck's avatar"
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 7, 2012 10:48pm
There are no Santorum supporters. There are, however, a lot of people that will vote for the person their TV tells them is "surging in the polls".pmoney25;1079089 wrote:Looks like Santorum is going to have a good night. Have you ever met anyone who supports Santorum? Im serious cause I havent.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05882/058829be9652656b7c775c37d17acd48a7eb9b25" alt="sleeper's avatar"
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Feb 7, 2012 10:53pm
I lol'd. Yeah, I tell you what Santorum won't win a state against Obama.Cleveland Buck;1079172 wrote:There are no Santorum supporters. There are, however, a lot of people that will vote for the person their TV tells them is "surging in the polls".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29486/29486090ee0689a46c6d3e27f93dbcab7e0212a9" alt="majorspark's avatar"
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Feb 7, 2012 10:54pm
Don't be fooled. Sure there are some that may move their vote based on polls. He has support. I listen to WHLO most days. Quinn & Rose and Levin have been carrying his water long before any surge in the polls.Cleveland Buck;1079172 wrote:There are no Santorum supporters. There are, however, a lot of people that will vote for the person their TV tells them is "surging in the polls".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee697/ee697dcb2009d77d4bd2162d3abe0d37dcebec8b" alt="Cleveland Buck's avatar"
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 7, 2012 10:56pm
Well sure the warmongers on talk radio love him, but he comes in 3rd or 4th every state until the TV media starts pumping him up again.majorspark;1079184 wrote:Don't be fooled. Sure there are some that may move their vote based on polls. He has support. I listen to WHLO most days. Quinn & Rose and Levin have been carrying his water long before any surge in the polls.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29486/29486090ee0689a46c6d3e27f93dbcab7e0212a9" alt="majorspark's avatar"
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Feb 7, 2012 11:01pm
Polls do not even get close to accurate until just before the votes are cast. More of the fickle have made their choice at that point.Cleveland Buck;1079189 wrote:Well sure the warmongers on talk radio love him, but he comes in 3rd or 4th every state until the TV media starts pumping him up again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29486/29486090ee0689a46c6d3e27f93dbcab7e0212a9" alt="majorspark's avatar"
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Feb 7, 2012 11:03pm
Have you seen how red some states are? The republicans could nominate a retarded monkey and slap an R buy its name and it be good for a few states.sleeper;1079182 wrote:I lol'd. Yeah, I tell you what Santorum won't win a state against Obama.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05882/058829be9652656b7c775c37d17acd48a7eb9b25" alt="sleeper's avatar"
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Feb 7, 2012 11:07pm
Good point.majorspark;1079216 wrote:Have you seen how red some states are? The republicans could nominate a retarded monkey and slap an R buy its name and it be good for a few states.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee697/ee697dcb2009d77d4bd2162d3abe0d37dcebec8b" alt="Cleveland Buck's avatar"
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Feb 7, 2012 11:09pm
Santorum would win the states like Georgia and Mississippi, but there isn't a state north of the Mason-Dixon or west of Texas that he could win. Obama would take that election as a strong mandate of his disastrous regime.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29486/29486090ee0689a46c6d3e27f93dbcab7e0212a9" alt="majorspark's avatar"
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Feb 7, 2012 11:15pm
Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, the Dakotas?Cleveland Buck;1079232 wrote:Santorum would win the states like Georgia and Mississippi, but there isn't a state north of the Mason-Dixon or west of Texas that he could win. Obama would take that election as a strong mandate of his disastrous regime.