
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Apr 29, 2011 6:27pm
Could Cleveland take Mallett? What about Bowers? Randall Cobb haha. Akeem Ayers?

Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Apr 29, 2011 6:27pm
Ok dude....mark it down McCoy will not be the starter in 2 years
K
kayo
Posts: 126
Apr 29, 2011 6:28pm
wildcats20;754653 wrote:Anyone else REAL sick of hearing Goodell's voice???
Not nearly as tired as I am reading all the variants of the word 'retarded' on this board.

chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Apr 29, 2011 6:28pm
Browns select Jabaal Sheard from Pitt at 37

robj55
Posts: 9,511
Apr 29, 2011 6:28pm
Ty Webb;754654 wrote:San Francisco just got what I think will be the best QB out of this class
What makes you think that, he's never played under center, he has the biggest learning curve of any QB in this draft even more than Newton.

killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Apr 29, 2011 6:29pm
Sheard is the dude who threw some poor bastard through a window last Summer.
EDIT: It was a glass door at an art gallery.
EDIT: It was a glass door at an art gallery.

Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Apr 29, 2011 6:30pm
Why in the hell didn't they take Bowers?

like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 29, 2011 6:31pm
SportsAndLady;754658 wrote:No..Cleveland has too many needs...QB is probably last on their priority list.
And the QB class this year is just shitty imo.

Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Apr 29, 2011 6:32pm
Ty Webb;754666 wrote:Why in the hell didn't they take Bowers?


Early Cuyler
Posts: 1,097
Apr 29, 2011 6:32pm
Mulva;754674 wrote:
hahaha YES!

Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Apr 29, 2011 6:32pm
A running back? With Hightower and Wells? On a team who has failed to really ever run the ball?

Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Apr 29, 2011 6:32pm
Arizona would be a fitting spot for Derek Anderson 2.0.
Edit: but I guess it isn't meant to be. I think Williams is gonna be a good one. If Beanie ever stays healthy the 2 of them could be a solid punch.
Edit: but I guess it isn't meant to be. I think Williams is gonna be a good one. If Beanie ever stays healthy the 2 of them could be a solid punch.

Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Apr 29, 2011 6:33pm
like_that;754671 wrote:And the QB class this year is just shitty imo.
It will be even worse next year

Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Apr 29, 2011 6:33pm
I'm really surprised that Dalton and Kaepernick went before Mallett.

Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Apr 29, 2011 6:34pm
Nice pickup for Arizona....will be a nice compliment to Chris Wells

like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 29, 2011 6:43pm
Ty Webb;754679 wrote:It will be even worse next year
Andrew Luck disagrees. Nice fail.

KR1245
Posts: 4,317
Apr 29, 2011 6:49pm
A DE from Clemson not named Bowers? The dudes knee must be shot

Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Apr 29, 2011 6:51pm
like_that;754694 wrote:Andrew Luck disagrees. Nice fail.
As an overall class it will be much much worse
Who is the next best QB after him?

Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Apr 29, 2011 6:51pm
Andrew Luck.....then who else? Pryor? lol....I doubt it. Barclay? Seems like talent will be thin at that position.

like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 29, 2011 6:52pm
Ty Webb;754701 wrote:As an overall class it will be much much worse
Who is the next best QB after him?
Automatik;754703 wrote:Andrew Luck.....then who else? Pryor? lol....I doubt it. Barclay? Seems like talent will be thin at that position.
Its Andrew Luck + complete shit v.s. complete shit.
Andrew Luck's class wins.

Non
Posts: 9,517
Apr 29, 2011 6:53pm
Brooks Reed and JJ Watt to the Texans
looking to get after Manning
looking to get after Manning
S
Sonofanump
Apr 29, 2011 6:54pm
Wow, this thread has gone downhill fast with horrible opinions.

Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Apr 29, 2011 6:54pm
While this QB class is very mediocre, next years will be worse.

Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Apr 29, 2011 6:54pm
Non;754708 wrote:Brooks Reed and JJ Watt to the Texans
looking to get after Manning
I'm surprised Watt went that high actually. I bet he was a freak at the combine.

Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Apr 29, 2011 6:55pm
like_that;754707 wrote:Its Andrew Luck + complete shit v.s. complete shit.
Andrew Luck's class wins.
Wow....I didn't think you could know less about sports than I thought you did but your argument here proves it