O-Trap;733021 wrote:Um, Ender, I was talking about the cop in the article when I said he is an "ignorant idiot." Actually, I hadn't even noticed it was you who started this thread until now. I should have known you would assume I was speaking of you. Talk about speaking before you have the facts.

Ha! I just read his entire response and noticed this gaffe. Derp.

I mean, lol.

Ender Wiggin;732652 wrote:
Should I have put "Some cops..."? Because surely no one puts the actions of a few on the entire group, but I forgot im dealing with people of lower intelligence so I would have to spell everything out and hold your hand through a comprehension class.

Maybe you should have said, "this cop"? You know, since it was one guy.

Ender Wiggin;732652 wrote:
You are like a Highlights childrens magazine haha.

Good.damn.magazine.

enigmaax;733342 wrote:Maybe you should have said, "this cop"? You know, since it was one guy.

Quit deflecting from the real issue! How dare you correct Ender.

Ah fair enough, I can admit I misread and expected the usual trash spewed by a lot of you.

Im just so used to ignorant and dumb posts from you and the rest of the fan club I had just figured you all made yet another emotional response filled with conjecture and bile like you all always do.

As expected though the club takes one gaffe and runs with it, sad that they will do that yet ignore everything else, typical though, no surprise from those of lower intelligence.

Its funny how you said "get all the facts" when almost NO ONE has ever done that when Ive asked them to back up their silly bold claims.

And yes Highlights is an awesome magazine, a lot of you are like Goofus to my Gallant.

*sigh* Enigmaax I said earlier, does someone really have to hold peoples hands to get whats being conveyed? If you feel someone is placing the actions of one on the entire group then you arent very smart......as shown by the majority of people here already though so I guess so.

I even changed it to some so stupid people could understand easier but it seems it was still too hard to comprehend.

Ill do you one more, if you google say, cop sexually assaults woman, or something you will get multiple similar stories, thus making some valid.

Its not hard to think rationally, at least you all could try and not make yourselves look mentally challenged.

Ender why do you try to explain your bullshit, everyone knows how you feel about cops so who's the dumb one?

U r

I know but this isn't about me

Ender Wiggin;733763 wrote:*sigh* Enigmaax I said earlier, does someone really have to hold peoples hands to get whats being conveyed? If you feel someone is placing the actions of one on the entire group then you arent very smart......as shown by the majority of people here already though so I guess so.

I even changed it to some so stupid people could understand easier but it seems it was still too hard to comprehend.

Ill do you one more, if you google say, cop sexually assaults woman, or something you will get multiple similar stories, thus making some valid.

Its not hard to think rationally, at least you all could try and not make yourselves look mentally challenged.

Hey man, I don't care that you hate cops. I don't think any less of you.

But your title said, "some cops", so I was looking for the other ones in your reference. I didn't really find one, so you probably should have said "this cop" or something to that effect. It is just simple rules of language. Maybe this will illustrate it a little better - here's your basic statement with the story and your conclusion. "This cop said something dumb and that is why they need sensitivity training." Who is "they"? You only referenced one cop. Your thoughts (which are presented in your thread title) would be more easily communicated by one of the following:

"This cop said something dumb and that is why ...."
or
"This cop said something dumb and since I hate cops this is why they..."

As usual, a thread started by Ender never fails to make me LOL.

Jester;734003 wrote:As usual, a thread started by Ender never fails to make me LOL.

lol

power i;732600 wrote:That's kinda like when my husband makes one insensitive remark to a Somalian and the whole freakin' CFD has to go to sensitivity training. People are too soft these days.

My goodness me and your husband would get along. I absolutely loathe Somali's I pretty much had a freaking panic attack at the Wal Mart on Morse Road.

Ender Wiggin;733757 wrote:Ah fair enough, I can admit I misread and expected the usual trash spewed by a lot of you.

Im just so used to ignorant and dumb posts from you and the rest of the fan club I had just figured you all made yet another emotional response filled with conjecture and bile like you all always do.

As expected though the club takes one gaffe and runs with it, sad that they will do that yet ignore everything else, typical though, no surprise from those of lower intelligence.

Its funny how you said "get all the facts" when almost NO ONE has ever done that when Ive asked them to back up their silly bold claims.

And yes Highlights is an awesome magazine, a lot of you are like Goofus to my Gallant.

I have to admit. This is an awesome post. You got caught being so eager to prove your self-proclaimed intellectual superiority over someone you've argued issues with before that you completely whiffed on what that person was saying to the degree that most people probably felt bad for you because most people would have probably needed to absorb a LOT of head trauma (or at least be too wasted to think) to fuck that up so badly, which would be a big stalling point for a lot of people.

But you were able to show the cajones to pay lip-service to the fact you can make mistakes before immediately entering into a VEHEMENT proclamation of your self-proclaimed intellectual superiority. Now THAT is epic win, good sir!

Ender for GOAT OC OP.

rmolin73;734096 wrote:My goodness me and your husband would get along. I absolutely loathe Somali's I pretty much had a freaking panic attack at the Wal Mart on Morse Road.

Kidding? If not, why on earth do you loathe Somalis?

I Wear Pants;734131 wrote:Ender for GOAT OC OP.

Seconded.

power i;732600 wrote:That's kinda like when my husband makes one insensitive remark to a Somalian and the whole freakin' CFD has to go to sensitivity training. People are too soft these days.

Is your husband a cop? If so you do realize why that happened right?

I Wear Pants;734246 wrote:Is your husband a cop? If so you do realize why that happened right?

CFD- Columbus Fire Department

LJ;734248 wrote:CFD- Columbus Fire Department

Ah, that's a bit different to me. Cops are in a position of authority and as such need to be held to a higher standard.

Firemen, while essential, are not authority figures and as such I can give a bit more leeway to say what they want.

Is that how you spell leeway?

I Wear Pants;734255 wrote:Ah, that's a bit different to me. Cops are in a position of authority and as such need to be held to a higher standard.

Firemen, while essential, are not authority figures and as such I can give a bit more leeway to say what they want.

Is that how you spell leeway?

It is.

Spelling FTW