Laley23;725386 wrote:Bilas is correct. VCU did NOT have the resume to be in this tournament. No matter what the accomplish, it doesnt make up for the fact that no has a clue what merit they got in on. Unless the committee had a crystal ball foreseeing this great run...why are they in the tourney???
As for the VCU run and Butler run. I hope they both lose. I love great tourney runs, but I want my Final Four to be made up of the big dogs and make for great hype etc. Butler isnt quite the same, because back-to-back would be special. But I have little interest in seeing VCU in the F4. I already watched the worst F4 of all time when George Mason was in it...
SportsAndLady;725399 wrote:Bilas was definitely right..VCU should not have been in the tournament, based on their resume'. Whether or not VCU wins 0, 1, or 7 games in the tourney is irrelevant to his point.
I agree with you guys that Bilas' point of them not having the resume to get into the tourney was ok, however, he said they would get dominated and they are proving that wrong. He should at least own up to that.
Laley, I understand your opinion about having the big dogs in the F4, but I love seeing the cinderellas. That's what makes this tourney so great and seperates it from college football. You let the teams decide the national championship, not computers.