Archive OSU's record vs. NCAA tournament teams

september63

Posts: 5,789

Mar 22, 2011 2:41pm

thedynasty1998;720884 wrote:I don't particularly remember the FSU game, but I thought Florida played really well against OSU.

Ohio State won that game while shooting 32.9% from the field, including 4-20 from three's. Florida St. was 35.4% from the field, inluding 3-17 from three's.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Mar 22, 2011 2:44pm

thedynasty1998;720884 wrote:I don't particularly remember the FSU game, but I thought Florida played really well against OSU.

Yeah well that's not true.

OSU dominated them.

thedynasty1998

Posts: 6,844

Mar 22, 2011 2:52pm

SportsAndLady;720895 wrote:Yeah well that's not true.

OSU dominated them.

OSU dominated Florida?

Florida shot 61% from the field and 43% from 3 point range, and out rebounded OSU. Florida was up 3 at half. OSU didn't really pull away until there were about 8 minutes left in the game, if I remember correctly.

So yes, OSU played really well to beat them, but Florida actually played pretty well themselves.

Automatik

Posts: 14,632

Mar 22, 2011 2:56pm

The UF game was close until the 2nd half of the 2nd half. OSU just turned it on defensively and it opened everything up.

That was the first game when I was like...."Wow, OSU is actually the real deal and has the tools to win it all."

Fly4Fun

Posts: 7,730

Mar 22, 2011 2:57pm

SportandLady's logic primarily is that if OSU beat them then they obviously weren't playing well so it really doesn't count.

It obviously has nothing to do with the fact that OSU is a REALLY good team or anything.

se-alum

Posts: 13,948

Mar 22, 2011 3:11pm

UF played really well against OSU....bottomline.

Rotinaj

Posts: 7,699

Mar 22, 2011 3:19pm

You don't play REALLY well and lose a game by that much. They played good for most of the game but obviously a 20 point loss can't be called a very good played game.

se-alum

Posts: 13,948

Mar 22, 2011 3:54pm

Rotinaj;720930 wrote:You don't play REALLY well and lose a game by that much. They played good for most of the game but obviously a 20 point loss can't be called a very good played game.

You can play really well and get beat by a better more talented team.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Mar 22, 2011 4:20pm

Fly4Fun;720907 wrote:SportandLady's logic primarily is that if OSU beat them then they obviously weren't playing well so it really doesn't count.

It obviously has nothing to do with the fact that OSU is a REALLY good team or anything.

Are you serious?

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Mar 22, 2011 4:27pm

SportsAndLady;720183 wrote:By the way, 17-2 is ridiculous..that's a lot of tourney teams on one schedule. KU is only 10-2

SportsAndLady;720843 wrote:OSU was very good at the beginning of the season and are very good now.

SportsAndLady;720843 wrote:A FSU win over OSU in November/December would be very impressive

SportsAndLady;720879 wrote:but the difference between how UF and FSU were playing in November and how they are playing right now is a lot bigger than the difference between KU, OSU, Duke, etc.

SportsAndLady;720895 wrote:OSU dominated them.

Those are just things I have said about OSU in this thread. It's amazing, you can say nice things about a team and inevitably at least one of their fans take them as insults.

thedynasty1998

Posts: 6,844

Mar 22, 2011 4:40pm

A team can play well and still lose. OSU is just superior to Florida and if you remember how Donovan complimented OSU after the game I think he accepted that they just lost to a better team.

Even during that game I thought Florida was a really good team. They are like a poor man's OSU. A good post player, a good shooter on the perimeter, good PG play and they play good defensively.

Rotinaj

Posts: 7,699

Mar 22, 2011 4:54pm

You CANNOT play REALLY well and lose by 20. They let up over 90 points. They had a good offensive game and a bad defensive one. Florida played a good first HALF. One half doesn't translate to a REALLY well played game.

Automatik

Posts: 14,632

Mar 22, 2011 5:00pm

Donovan was being stubborn as hell that game. His press was getting DICED bad for easy buckets, but he kept it on.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Mar 22, 2011 5:31pm

thedynasty1998;721057 wrote:Even during that game I thought Florida was a really good team.

Did you think they were a good team against UCF? Or Jacksonville?

The whole point I was trying to make, was that UF is playing a lot better now then they were earlier this season...so while the OSU victory over UF looks good now, it wasn't a great victory then because UF got x10000 times better since then.

B

Big Gain

Posts: 2,073

Mar 22, 2011 8:46pm

SportsAndLady;720181 wrote:No they aren't. UF and FSU are x10000 times better right now then they were when OSU played them. That's like me saying the OT win @ Michigan looks good for Kansas...no it doesn't, because Michigan wasn't actually a good team until the end of the year.

And Ohio State is x100000 better right now then they were when they played them.

thedynasty1998

Posts: 6,844

Mar 22, 2011 9:47pm

SportsAndLady;721101 wrote:Did you think they were a good team against UCF? Or Jacksonville?

The whole point I was trying to make, was that UF is playing a lot better now then they were earlier this season...so while the OSU victory over UF looks good now, it wasn't a great victory then because UF got x10000 times better since then.

Yes they improved but it was and still is a quality win.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Mar 22, 2011 10:13pm

Big Gain;721260 wrote:And Ohio State is x100000 better right now then they were when they played them.

I don't think so. OSU started the year as a great team and are a great team now.

se-alum

Posts: 13,948

Mar 22, 2011 10:53pm

SportsAndLady;721101 wrote:Did you think they were a good team against UCF? Or Jacksonville?

The whole point I was trying to make, was that UF is playing a lot better now then they were earlier this season...so while the OSU victory over UF looks good now, it wasn't a great victory then because UF got x10000 times better since then.

So should we discount FSU win over Duke, because if you watched that game, Duke played horribly. Duke wasn't playing well at the time, so it wasn't that good a win for FSU.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Mar 22, 2011 11:05pm

se-alum;721379 wrote:So should we discount FSU win over Duke, because if you watched that game, Duke played horribly. Duke wasn't playing well at the time, so it wasn't that good a win for FSU.

If you think FSU was playing as well in the beginning of the season as they were now, there is no hope for you.

S

superman

Posts: 3,582

Mar 24, 2011 9:24am

I love watching soccer fans try to argue sports.

FSU was 11-3 OOC. They had Singleton healthy. They played pretty well all season.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Mar 24, 2011 10:06am

superman;722539 wrote:I love watching soccer fans try to argue sports.

FSU was 11-3 OOC. They had Singleton healthy. They played pretty well all season.

FSU was 10-4 OOC...they lost to Auburn for Christ Sakes. Their only 'solid' OOC victory was a home win against Baylor, who isn't even in the NCAA tourney.

I love watching retards try to argue sports.

S

superman

Posts: 3,582

Mar 24, 2011 11:09am

The night before the Auburn game one of the players stubbed his toe and they were up all night as a team crying together. Only lost when their emotional tanks ran dry.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Mar 24, 2011 11:24am

superman;722635 wrote:The night before the Auburn game one of the players stubbed his toe and they were up all night as a team crying together. Only lost when their emotional tanks ran dry.

Like I said..I love watching retardos talk about sports

Automatik

Posts: 14,632

Mar 24, 2011 2:45pm

superman;722635 wrote:The night before the Auburn game one of the players stubbed his toe and they were up all night as a team crying together. Only lost when their emotional tanks ran dry.

I'm guessing they didn't even eat their breakfast.