Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Mar 13, 2011 5:38pm
Ok, everything should be updated now, including spreading out the Big East teams a little better.
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Mar 13, 2011 5:46pm
Ironman92;710132 wrote:It really looks very good overall and IMO fewer question marks than the one we will be debating in a couple of hours.
I don't see how Xavier can be 3 seeds higher than WVU.
Well, Xavier is the last 5 seed on my s-curve and West Virginia is the 2nd 7 seed, so I only have Xavier 6 spots ahead of West Virginia. I had moved them down to an 8 to make things work, but now I figured out a way to change them back.
N
NilesPacMan
Posts: 452
Mar 13, 2011 5:46pm
sportswizuhrd;710189 wrote:Someone should take screen grabs of notable blogs/sites(ESPN, CBS, etc.) and see who does the best. I have heard that while he is good at projecting the field, Lunardi isn't that well at predicting match-ups.
I got ESPN and SI matchups. CBS Sports is too much of a pain in the butt to try to screen shot right now.
Cleveland Buck
Posts: 5,126
Mar 13, 2011 6:46pm
Well, I did get the top 4 seeds in the East right. And some of the matchups. And I did have UAB as my first team out. I couldn't see VCU getting in though.