Who do you side with in the NFL labor talks?

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ Who do you side with in the NFL labor talks?
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Mar 5, 2011 2:54 PM
jordo212000;700228 wrote:care to respond to my post?

I'll post it again in case you missed it...
I will concede. Have a nice day.
Mar 5, 2011 2:54pm
S

slingshot4ever

Senior Member

4,085 posts
Mar 5, 2011 3:57 PM
Neither, they are all so fucking greedy it makes me sick.
Mar 5, 2011 3:57pm
KnightRyder's avatar

KnightRyder

Senior Member

1,428 posts
Mar 6, 2011 10:37 AM
bases_loaded;699106 wrote:No you can't look at it that way because someone will fill their job for much less than they are making now. Football is a loved sport and people love watching it. The players have the privilege to play a GAME for a large sum of money because OWNERS allow them to. Without OWNERS there are no teams, without teams there is no NFL. Without the NFLPA there are still players that can fill the teams and people will still tune in to watch it.

do you really think people will tune in watch? do you remember the strike in 87 when the owners brought in replacement players? nobody watched and the stadiums were empty.
Mar 6, 2011 10:37am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Mar 11, 2011 5:10 PM
I am on neither side. Players, owners, and most importantly (for me, and I assume most everyone else) fans all lose.
Mar 11, 2011 5:10pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Mar 11, 2011 5:37 PM
after paying attention to this some..im not on either side. They are both a bunch of greedy fucks. Seems like the players have a little bit of edge being more greedy though
Mar 11, 2011 5:37pm
jordo212000's avatar

jordo212000

Senior Member

10,664 posts
Mar 11, 2011 6:30 PM
I'm already tired of the public posturing in the hours since the union decertified. Goodell and the owners screwed the pooch. Adding 2 regular season games while stressing player safety was beyond laughable
Mar 11, 2011 6:30pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
Mar 11, 2011 8:30 PM
I can't believe what greedy fucks ALL of them are. Billions of dollars to divvy up and they let this blow up. It would be laughable if not for the stupidity of all involved.

If they let this go on and ruin a season, people should stop supporting their insanity and simply stay away. Maybe if there isn't so much money they'd be a little smarter and less greedy.
Mar 11, 2011 8:30pm
jordo212000's avatar

jordo212000

Senior Member

10,664 posts
Mar 11, 2011 8:36 PM
Obviously the NFL is incredibly arrogant here. Did they not see what happened to baseball and hockey? Neither sport has been the same
Mar 11, 2011 8:36pm
End of Line's avatar

End of Line

It's Clobberin Time!

6,867 posts
Mar 12, 2011 1:19 AM
jordo212000;708368 wrote:Obviously the NFL is incredibly arrogant here. Did they not see what happened to baseball and hockey? Neither sport has been the same

The lockout actually helped the NHL in a way.
Mar 12, 2011 1:19am
OQB's avatar

OQB

Senior Member

6,679 posts
Mar 12, 2011 2:04 AM


^Dumbass!
Mar 12, 2011 2:04am
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Mar 12, 2011 2:08 AM
I've changed my mind and decided to side with the owners, because I am so fucking sick of seeing DeMaurice Smith's face.
Mar 12, 2011 2:08am
OQB's avatar

OQB

Senior Member

6,679 posts
Mar 12, 2011 2:47 AM
^ haha..... sorry I had to do it :D



^With the union decertifying and a lockout....does that mean he is now unemployed?
Mar 12, 2011 2:47am
redstreak one's avatar

redstreak one

Senior Member

1,152 posts
Mar 12, 2011 9:05 AM
I vote neither and please let professional sports die a slow painful death!
Mar 12, 2011 9:05am
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Mar 12, 2011 9:22 AM
redstreak one;708881 wrote:I vote neither and please let professional sports die a slow painful death!
Agreed. We should just embrace the pristine college landscape full of drugs, robberies and recruiting violations.
Mar 12, 2011 9:22am
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Mar 12, 2011 9:25 AM
Players want to see 10 years of financial records of the owners.

Seems a little bit overboard. Ya really dont know who oto believer. Owners reps say that the players wanted litigation all along. I think the truth, as usual, lies in the middle.
I would like to know about the offer the players left on the table.

I still side with the owners though.
Mar 12, 2011 9:25am
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Mar 12, 2011 10:26 AM
I think it's evident that the players wanted litigation all along. From what I've seen, the owners tried to meet the players in the middle, but the players wouldnt budge from their position.
Mar 12, 2011 10:26am
A

Al Bundy

Senior Member

4,180 posts
Mar 12, 2011 10:44 AM
KnightRyder;700809 wrote:do you really think people will tune in watch? do you remember the strike in 87 when the owners brought in replacement players? nobody watched and the stadiums were empty.

The players would eventually come back. What else are they going to do? In 1987 the strike was only 3 weeks and many of the players came back to play in the replacement games by the third week. Once they miss one or two of those $100,000 checks every other week, they will be back.
Mar 12, 2011 10:44am
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Mar 12, 2011 10:50 AM
Pick6;708926 wrote:I think it's evident that the players wanted litigation all along. From what I've seen, the owners tried to meet the players in the middle, but the players wouldnt budge from their position.

I wonder if they players believe that through litigation they will get a better deal. The NFL is the top league in the land and much of it has to do with how it is set up. I dont know, maybe they can win some anti trust lawsuits against the league but damn.....we always say we wish other sports was like the NFL in how it was set up with a cap, revenue sharing etc etc etc.

They really want better healthcare for players when they are done. I can see that...but then I also think that is something in past negotiations they didnt push as much for in lieu of more money now.
Mar 12, 2011 10:50am
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Mar 12, 2011 10:54 AM
smh chad johnson...

ochocinco Chad Ochocinco
Since I can't get in trouble due to the circumstances, fuck the lockout issues just take out the celebration rule, that's all I want :)
Mar 12, 2011 10:54am
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Mar 12, 2011 11:15 AM
Writerbuckeye;708966 wrote:Here's a summary of what the owners proposed. I see nothing wrong here. The players should have found a way to make this work.

http://nfllabor.com/2011/03/11/exclusive-summary-of-nfl-proposal-to-nflpa/

Sounds good...but need to know what split of the overall pot is what the players are looking at...and the benefits packages seem a little vague. I am thinking it sounds pretty good...but this is the word from the owenrs perspective
Mar 12, 2011 11:15am
redstreak one's avatar

redstreak one

Senior Member

1,152 posts
Mar 12, 2011 3:11 PM
Without pro sports you wouldnt get the type of people involved in college sports like you mentioned tha voice! Pro sports epitomize all things wrong with society! If you cant read or write and have a history of law breaking, no reason to head to college, it wont be a stepping stone anymore!
Mar 12, 2011 3:11pm
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Mar 14, 2011 9:25 AM
redstreak one;709204 wrote:Without pro sports you wouldnt get the type of people involved in college sports like you mentioned tha voice! Pro sports epitomize all things wrong with society! If you cant read or write and have a history of law breaking, no reason to head to college, it wont be a stepping stone anymore!
One could spin it the other way. How many kids have gotten the chance to go to college soley because of their athletic prowess? I venture many, many more kids have gotten a college education soley on their ability in sports, and turned thier lives around, than that have went and became misfits of society.
Mar 14, 2011 9:25am
redstreak one's avatar

redstreak one

Senior Member

1,152 posts
Mar 14, 2011 11:33 AM
^^^^ And they still would have that chance without pro sports! Colleges would still want to win and attract players to do so, however it would take those that are forced to college, you know the NFL and the NBA putting rules in place to players in college 1 or 3 years and now those kids wouldnt even bother going to college unless they wanted to get an education. You didnt hear these kinds of problems in the 70's or earlier because pro sports hadnt grown into the major business it is now. Yes, there were problems, but not on the same level as today.

I say, let the pro teams take kids from high school and be done with it.
Mar 14, 2011 11:33am
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Mar 14, 2011 11:40 AM
redstreak one;711633 wrote:^^^^ And they still would have that chance without pro sports! Colleges would still want to win and attract players to do so, however it would take those that are forced to college, you know the NFL and the NBA putting rules in place to players in college 1 or 3 years and now those kids wouldnt even bother going to college unless they wanted to get an education. You didnt hear these kinds of problems in the 70's or earlier because pro sports hadnt grown into the major business it is now. Yes, there were problems, but not on the same level as today.

I say, let the pro teams take kids from high school and be done with it.
Exactly. Ya said that there are criminals in college because there are professional sports. I am saying that because of pro sports, and the interest in it, that many kids got to go to college and turn their lives around with a degree compared if there were no pro sports or attraction to it. We are both right believe it or not!

As for comparing the 70's to right now.......well........there might be a correlation to race than we want to really get into. I think one thing, that is not particularly racial, is that kids at an earlier and earlier age are recognized because of their athletic ability, and are surrounded by people who wont tell them no and they are doing wrong. They get much more publicity than before at a younger age, and they get a sense of entitlement and they are above it all. The egos nowadays of the athletes seemed to be bigger than ever and its becuase of the attention they get. hell......the top recruite now have live TV showing when they announce what college they are coing to play at. Back in the day ya found out when they had a picture in the paper. That is a big reason nowadays as well.

Also dont put it past that back in the day authorities allowed atheltes to walk and get away from things alot more.
Mar 14, 2011 11:40am