ytownfootball;682913 wrote:That has no bearing as to whether I'm impressed or not.
I wouldn't assume it had any bearing.
ytownfootball;682913 wrote:That has no bearing as to whether I'm impressed or not.
SQ_Crazies;682792 wrote:Bet he's gay.
+1, the hypocrisy of Title IX is the main reason why I don't believe girls should be allowed to wrestle against boys.bigkahuna;683000 wrote:I have a couple of thoughts on this.
3. As liberal as I am, I truly don't think that girls should be allowed to play on boys' teams. (Co-ed is different, I'm talking about Title IX shit). I remember there was a guy I went to high school with that wanted to be a cheerleader and was told no. You rarely hear of this going the other way (I think there was that lacrosse kid in PA).
I Wear Pants;683025 wrote:Kid is an idiot.
And for all the "he's just sticking to his beliefs" people. So are the Westboro Baptist people and they're dumb as shit. Just because something is a belief of yours doesn't exclude it from criticism or from being absolutely silly.
Thread Bomber;683283 wrote:A teenager weighing in at 112 lbs, girl or boy has do advantage/disadvantage. In high school I knew a couple of girls around 120 lbs that could wipe the hallways with most boys thier size or a little larger.
As for this, this boy is in a disadvantage in life. He is home schooled and his father is a minister. You can say what you want, but this boy has no beliefs of his own, only the one his family has indoctrinated him with. This is neither good or bad, it just is.
Thread Bomber;683283 wrote:A teenager weighing in at 112 lbs, girl or boy has do advantage/disadvantage.
I wasn't using it to compare the actions. I was using it to show that the idea that beliefs are something that cannot be criticized or questioned is wrong. It being the kids belief has no bearing on whether it was dumb or not.jmog;683174 wrote:The difference is huge, the Westboro idiots are infringing on other peoples rights, he is not.
Such a bad comparison it isn't even funny.
You just straightened my point. This girl is a fresh woman and qualified for the state meet in IOWA! and exactly how do you know that she didn't cut from 120 or so. We are not talking about the upper weight classes, we're talking about 112.gut;683297 wrote:That's a pretty dumb statement. Most 112 lbers are cutting from 120 or so and many are capable of benching 150-200 lbs (depends on age). Just because they are the same weight doesn't mean strength and speed are equal. Sure, technique counts for much more in wrestling at all weights but don't try to tell me this girl is physically equal to the boys in that class. Not to mention, she's a freshman and there are many sophomores and juniors, and sometimes seniors, in that weight class.
That why I said it was neither right or wrong, it just is.september63;683296 wrote:You are correct. I might add though, its isnt society's job to parent this boy or instill morals into him. Thats his parent job and we must allow this when no laws are being broken.
Thread Bomber;683306 wrote:You just straightened my point. This girl is a fresh woman and qualified for the state meet in IOWA! and exactly how do you know that she didn't cut from 120 or so. We are not talking about the upper weight classes, we're talking about 112.
Thread Bomber;683283 wrote:As for this, this boy is in a disadvantage in life. He is home schooled and his father is a minister. You can say what you want, but this boy has no beliefs of his own, only the one his family has indoctrinated him with. This is neither good or bad, it just is.
I did not say he had no hope. I said he was disadvantaged. Tebow is a red herring. mane a couple other home schoolers off the top of your head with out googling it.OSH;683337 wrote:I am sure many people said the exact same thing about Tim Tebow. I think Tebow's doing just fine with his decisions he's made also..
Thread Bomber;683370 wrote:I did not say he had no hope. I said he was disadvantaged. Tebow is a red herring. mane a couple other home schoolers off the top of your head with out googling it.
While an education at home may be the choice for some families, the children do not have the social skills of the kids that go to schools.
A sheltered life is a double edged sword. and having experience relating to a diverse group of people is invaluable growing up