Cavs or Ohio State

College Sports 93 replies 4,082 views
UA5straightin2008's avatar
UA5straightin2008
Posts: 3,246
Feb 8, 2011 5:55pm
Was asked who would win in a game between the Cavs and OSU yesterday, and just saw the question posed on PTI?

Whatd you think?
Y
yobro08
Posts: 237
Feb 8, 2011 5:57pm
cavs by alot
wes_mantooth's avatar
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Feb 8, 2011 5:57pm
cavs by a lot.

They are god awful, but the are kind of a pro team
SQ_Crazies's avatar
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Feb 8, 2011 5:58pm
Cavs by 20+. Stupid question.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Feb 8, 2011 6:05pm
SQ_Crazies;670581 wrote:Cavs by 20+. Stupid question.

this, +1000
september63's avatar
september63
Posts: 5,789
Feb 8, 2011 6:08pm
Cavs by as many as everyone else suggested. Ill even 2nd the stupid question comment!!
D
dave
Posts: 4,558
Feb 8, 2011 6:09pm
If the Cavs tried it would be at least a 40 point game, probably much more.
B
burt07
Posts: 600
Feb 8, 2011 6:18pm
Always the dumbest debate, no matter what the sport.
Y-Town Steelhound's avatar
Y-Town Steelhound
Posts: 1,388
Feb 8, 2011 6:20pm
Cavs by at least 20
jordo212000's avatar
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Feb 8, 2011 6:28pm
Is there an SQ Crazies sighting?

As for the matchup, I have got to say the Cavs win, but I would like to see the game. I think Ohio State could keep it close for a while
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 8, 2011 6:31pm
jordo212000;670623 wrote: I think Ohio State could keep it close for a while

Why am I not surprised that you are the only one on this thread who thinks this?
Tiger2003's avatar
Tiger2003
Posts: 15,421
Feb 8, 2011 6:48pm
jordo212000;670623 wrote: I think Ohio State could keep it close for a while

The only time it would be close is the first 5 minutes.
jordo212000's avatar
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Feb 8, 2011 7:36pm
I think Ohio State could keep it close for a while

The only time it would be close is the first 5 minutes.
You might be right, but if the time comes where Sullinger gets drafted by the Cavs, he automatically becomes their best player. If he was still playing for the Buckeyes, they'd have the best player on the court. That alone makes me think they could be competitive. IF the other guys on the team play their best I see no reason why they couldn't keep up.

Let's remember Manny Harris is one of their better players. Ohio States 2s and 3s can handle him. They have in the past
KR1245's avatar
KR1245
Posts: 4,317
Feb 8, 2011 7:40pm
Cavs by 30......at least

Manny Harris isnt one of the Cavs better players
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 8, 2011 7:52pm
jordo212000;670726 wrote:You might be right, but if the time comes where Sullinger gets drafted by the Cavs, he automatically becomes their best player. If he was still playing for the Buckeyes, they'd have the best player on the court. That alone makes me think they could be competitive. IF the other guys on the team play their best I see no reason why they couldn't keep up.

Let's remember Manny Harris is one of their better players. Ohio States 2s and 3s can handle him. They have in the past

You seriously are retarded.

1) Sullinger does not become Cleveland's best player if he were drafted by the Cavs and their roster is the same as it is right now.

2) Even if Sullinger is the best player, that doesn't mean OSU would be competitive. Just because you have the best player does not mean you can be competitive.

3) Manny Harris is not one of the Cavs best players, he's not even top 5. He's averaging 7 points a game for christ sake.

4) Ohio State's 2s and 3s might have handled Manny before, does not mean that they could do it again; he's had a year of training in the damn NBA, I think he's probably improved by the time he was at Michigan.
GOONx19's avatar
GOONx19
Posts: 7,147
Feb 8, 2011 8:02pm
Just stop now, Jordo.
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
Feb 8, 2011 8:21pm
Are we talking NBA (48 minutes) or college (40 minutes) time?
M
mallymal614
Posts: 3,746
Feb 8, 2011 8:23pm
SQ_Crazies;670581 wrote:Cavs by 20+. Stupid question.

Well look who's back!
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Feb 8, 2011 8:30pm
mallymal614;670782 wrote:Are we talking NBA (48 minutes) or college (40 minutes) time?

The only difference would be the final score for each team.


A college team would NEVER beat an NBA team. I don't care what rules you play, who refs the game, where the game is played. It would never happen.

The BEST college teams usually have 2-3 pros on the team. The WORST pro team has 12 pros on their roster.
jordo212000's avatar
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Feb 8, 2011 9:11pm
Am I missing something? Where did I say Ohio State would beat Cleveland. I am just saying that I think Ohio State could keep it fairly competitive for a while.

I don't care what any of you say, Sullinger would instantly be the best player on that team. Who is better than him? Sure you need more than one good player, but just look at the Cavs. "One" player made a big difference on how many wins they are going to finish with this year. With Lebron they at least finish in the top 3 in the East. Without him they are a lottery team. Not saying Sullinger = Lebron, just saying that one guy can dramatically improve a team and make up for lesser parts surrounding him.
jordo212000's avatar
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Feb 8, 2011 9:11pm
wildcats20;670789 wrote:The WORST pro team has 12 pros on their roster.

That's debatable
SQ_Crazies's avatar
SQ_Crazies
Posts: 7,977
Feb 8, 2011 9:15pm
jordo212000;670847 wrote:That's debatable

LMFAO
ytownfootball's avatar
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Feb 8, 2011 9:18pm
Jesus H...SMH
jordo212000's avatar
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Feb 8, 2011 9:23pm
Who is better than Sullinger right now on the Cavs roster. Seriously?
Crimson streak's avatar
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Feb 8, 2011 9:38pm
Hickson, Jameson, Gibson. Andy , sessions, mo, do I need to continue?