Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Politics ▸ Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory
B

bman618

Senior Member

151 posts
Dec 31, 2009 1:31 PM
Some conspiracies I don't believe in HARP and items like that. I don't think we are being told about the complete picture of 9/11 but I don't think it was an inside job. The global warming show was good and I think our effect on the globe is being wildly overstated to achieve the structure for a global government, which was last night's show. The UN Secretary General and prominent Heads of State have admitted they want to form a world government.

Ultimately conspiracies come from hiding information and not telling the complete truth.
Dec 31, 2009 1:31pm
Glory Days's avatar

Glory Days

Senior Member

7,809 posts
Dec 31, 2009 2:54 PM
bman618 wrote: Ultimately conspiracies come from hiding information and not telling the complete truth.
but that doesnt mean something sinister is going on. which is basically all the talk about the Bilderberg thing. from what i can tell, there is no proof they have done anything. for all we know its a bunch of world leaders getting together to do keg stands and playing hacky sack. so they are trying to kill us all using the water and medicine....yet life expectancy keeps getting longer? that doesnt make sense.
Dec 31, 2009 2:54pm
E

eersandbeers

Senior Member

1,071 posts
Dec 31, 2009 4:03 PM
Glory Days wrote:
bman618 wrote: Ultimately conspiracies come from hiding information and not telling the complete truth.
but that doesnt mean something sinister is going on. which is basically all the talk about the Bilderberg thing. from what i can tell, there is no proof they have done anything. for all we know its a bunch of world leaders getting together to do keg stands and playing hacky sack. so they are trying to kill us all using the water and medicine....yet life expectancy keeps getting longer? that doesnt make sense.
Well, you mean besides pushing and creating the Euro? Let me guess, this is just a conspiracy right?
Dec 31, 2009 4:03pm
Glory Days's avatar

Glory Days

Senior Member

7,809 posts
Dec 31, 2009 7:19 PM
more like speculation from people who arent members of the group and write articles that will grab someone's attention. from what i have briefly looked at who attend those meetings, less than half are part of the European Union, even less are the part of the Union that uses Euros. why is the Euro such a bad thing? granted i dont know everything about it, but when those countries are located so close together and travel happens frequently between them, why not come up with one currency? plus not even all members of the Union use the Euro. and from what i have read the results of the Euro have been positive and even increased tourism. what is the Bilderberg group gaining? how did the Euro impact everyone outside the European union or should i say, what did the non European Bilderberg members have to gain?
Dec 31, 2009 7:19pm
B

bman618

Senior Member

151 posts
Dec 31, 2009 7:50 PM
It's a process of simply addition. There are people out there like the UN Secretary General and heads of state saying their goal is to form a world government. Then you have the 120 most powerful folks in the world getting together to talk about affairs.

This is very worrisome to me as I highly value localized self government. Dozens of massive bureaucracies at the world government level will further remove the people from decision making.
Dec 31, 2009 7:50pm
E

eersandbeers

Senior Member

1,071 posts
Dec 31, 2009 8:05 PM
Glory Days wrote: more like speculation from people who arent members of the group and write articles that will grab someone's attention. from what i have briefly looked at who attend those meetings, less than half are part of the European Union, even less are the part of the Union that uses Euros. why is the Euro such a bad thing? granted i dont know everything about it, but when those countries are located so close together and travel happens frequently between them, why not come up with one currency? plus not even all members of the Union use the Euro. and from what i have read the results of the Euro have been positive and even increased tourism. what is the Bilderberg group gaining? how did the Euro impact everyone outside the European union or should i say, what did the non European Bilderberg members have to gain?

"A meeting in June in Europe of the Bilderberg Group - an informal club of leading politicians, businessmen and thinkers chaired by Mr Davignon - could also "improve understanding" on future action, in the same way it helped create the euro in the 1990s, he said."

http://euobserver.com/9/27778


Davignon is the current chairman of the Bilderberg group and former VP of the European Community. He just plainly admitted the Bilderberg Group pushed and helped create the Euro.

The Euro, as an economic union, is not bad in theory. However, the EU is trying to create a single government that governs all member states. So I guess it comes down to whether or not you value your sovereignty.

A large part of Europe is quickly becoming a single state. Look at how rapidly it has progressed in the last 50 years.

The Bilderberg Group have members around the world that possess a large stake in the wealth of Europe. Concentrating power into one single entity, like the EU, makes it far easier to control the actions of member states to benefit your priorities.
Dec 31, 2009 8:05pm
E

eersandbeers

Senior Member

1,071 posts
Dec 31, 2009 8:08 PM
bman618 wrote: It's a process of simply addition. There are people out there like the UN Secretary General and heads of state saying their goal is to form a world government. Then you have the 120 most powerful folks in the world getting together to talk about affairs.

This is very worrisome to me as I highly value localized self government. Dozens of massive bureaucracies at the world government level will further remove the people from decision making.

You'll find our biggest banks, and most of the Fed, is controlled by globalists who favor consolidated governments because it increases their power and wealth. Rockefeller was as big of a globalist as you can find.

It will not be a one world government in the traditional sense. It is much harder and will not be accepted by populations. It will be a one world government where the few control the banks and wealth of the majority of nations.

Don't forget what Rothschild said, "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws."
Dec 31, 2009 8:08pm
Glory Days's avatar

Glory Days

Senior Member

7,809 posts
Jan 1, 2010 4:02 AM
eersandbeers wrote:
"A meeting in June in Europe of the Bilderberg Group - an informal club of leading politicians, businessmen and thinkers chaired by Mr Davignon - could also "improve understanding" on future action, in the same way it helped create the euro in the 1990s, he said."
[/i]
http://euobserver.com/9/27778


Davignon is the current chairman of the Bilderberg group and former VP of the European Community. He just plainly admitted the Bilderberg Group pushed and helped create the Euro.

The Euro, as an economic union, is not bad in theory. However, the EU is trying to create a single government that governs all member states. So I guess it comes down to whether or not you value your sovereignty.

A large part of Europe is quickly becoming a single state. Look at how rapidly it has progressed in the last 50 years.

The Bilderberg Group have members around the world that possess a large stake in the wealth of Europe. Concentrating power into one single entity, like the EU, makes it far easier to control the actions of member states to benefit your priorities.
"When we were having debates on the euro, people [at Bilderberg events] could explain why it was worth taking risks and the others, for whom the formal policy was not to believe in it, were not obliged not to listen and had to stand up and come up with real arguments

to me that sounds like a bunch of world leaders just talking. world leaders get together all the time, whats the difference if they talk about it at a bilderberg conference, at the white house, or on a conference call between a few leaders?


i see it as a handful of people from a country dont have enough power alone, especially in this country and in this day and age, to make any real changes. i just dont see it being enough to influence enough people to make things happen.
Jan 1, 2010 4:02am