Rules Changes: Airing of Grievances.

Thread Bomber's Basement 324 replies 3,131 views
Ender Wiggin's avatar
Ender Wiggin
Posts: 1,124
Jan 24, 2011 10:52pm
THE4RINGZ;651603 wrote:Why not just ban the people who consistently cause trouble?

Youd have to have a definition for "trouble" for example, some people got mad at me for my opinion but never said anything about capone in the topics.

I agree fully with your sentiment though.
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 24, 2011 10:53pm
se-alum;651615 wrote:Agree. It could've been done differently, imo. I didn't realize things had gotten as bad as they have. Seriously doubt I come back when all the shit goes down.

I know I'm leaving.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 24, 2011 10:53pm
coyotes22;651620 wrote:I think as long as the banning does not get out of hand, it will prove to be effective in the end.

It will completely be at our discretion. Essentially people who continuously disrupt the forum will get the boot.
THE4RINGZ's avatar
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Jan 24, 2011 10:54pm
Ender Wiggin;651624 wrote:Youd have to have a definition for "trouble" for example, some people got mad at me for my opinion but never said anything about capone in the topics.

I agree fully with your sentiment though.
Yeah it won't be easy to define.
ytownfootball's avatar
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Jan 24, 2011 10:54pm
Who the fuck would have to define trouble?

Not Ringz

Not me

GTFO
THE4RINGZ's avatar
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Jan 24, 2011 10:55pm
LJ;651628 wrote:It will completely be at our discretion. Essentially people who continuously disrupt the forum will get the boot.
So I can take them all off my ignore list on 2/2/2011?
se-alum's avatar
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jan 24, 2011 10:55pm
coyotes22;651620 wrote:I think as long as the banning does not get out of hand, it will prove to be effective in the end.
Thing is, the changes are going to go far beyond banning.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 24, 2011 10:56pm
THE4RINGZ;651633 wrote:So I can take them all off my ignore list on 2/2/2011?

Basically
coyotes22's avatar
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jan 24, 2011 10:56pm
LJ;651628 wrote:It will completely be at our discretion. Essentially people who continuously disrupt the forum will get the boot.

If it helps, more power to the mods, and good luck. I have never had a problem with this site, and have no plans on leaving, any time soon.
THE4RINGZ's avatar
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Jan 24, 2011 10:56pm
ytownfootball;651630 wrote:Who the fuck would have to define trouble?

Not Ringz

Not me

GTFO
I will define trouble for you.
-Society-'s avatar
-Society-
Posts: 1,348
Jan 24, 2011 10:57pm
LJ;651628 wrote:It will completely be at our discretion. Essentially people who continuously disrupt the forum will get the boot.

Do you realize how big of a dumbass you come off as?
THE4RINGZ's avatar
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Jan 24, 2011 10:57pm
se-alum;651635 wrote:Thing is, the changes are going to go far beyond banning.
Public floggings? Cause I am down with that.
coyotes22's avatar
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jan 24, 2011 10:57pm
se-alum;651635 wrote:Thing is, the changes are going to go far beyond banning.

Like what? I ask, but do not feel any heat. I try and get along with everyone, so any changes, I feel, prolly will not affect me.
ytownfootball's avatar
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Jan 24, 2011 10:58pm
THE4RINGZ;651638 wrote:I will define trouble for you.

You'd find we'd be in agreement more than you might think.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 24, 2011 10:59pm
-Society-;651641 wrote:Do you realize how big of a dumbass you come off as?
that means.....

oh about nothing coming from you

Get your shots in now. You won't be here very long.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Jan 24, 2011 10:59pm
se-alum;651635 wrote:Thing is, the changes are going to go far beyond banning.

It's not that bad. It's kinda hard to do something more than ban a person. I mean, there will be more rules but the worst that can happen is a banning.
THE4RINGZ's avatar
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Jan 24, 2011 10:59pm
ytownfootball;651646 wrote:You'd find we'd be in agreement more than you might think.
I don't think I would be too surprised.
bases_loaded's avatar
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Jan 24, 2011 11:00pm
Did Dynasty kill CoA and justin got a certified letter from the state?

Where did all his malarky come from?
like_that's avatar
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Jan 24, 2011 11:00pm
Hmm another poster thinking LJ is a piece of shit. I guess that is just coincidence..... /sarcasm
se-alum's avatar
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jan 24, 2011 11:00pm
coyotes22;651643 wrote:Like what? I ask, but do not feel any heat. I try and get along with everyone, so any changes, I feel, prolly will not affect me.
We had to agree not to post details about the changes until Justin decides to put it out there for everyone. Ultimately it's his site, so I will respect his request.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 24, 2011 11:01pm
like_that;651653 wrote:Hmm another poster thinking LJ is a piece of shit. I guess that is just coincidence..... /sarcasm

Being in agreement with Society is not something I would be bragging about.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Jan 24, 2011 11:01pm
I wasn't planning on releasing this info quite yet but it looks like things have escalated enough that I need to cover my ass. Essentially, come Feb 1st I won't be the owner of the site any more.
coyotes22's avatar
coyotes22
Posts: 11,298
Jan 24, 2011 11:01pm
se-alum;651654 wrote:We had to agree not to post details about the changes until Justin decides to put it out there for everyone. Ultimately it's his site, so I will respect his request.

Thats cool. I understand.
-Society-'s avatar
-Society-
Posts: 1,348
Jan 24, 2011 11:01pm
LJ;651647 wrote:that means.....

oh about nothing coming from you

Get your shots in now. You won't be here very long.
Hahaha....is something missing in your life? You are pathetic.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Jan 24, 2011 11:02pm
I am not able to disclose the buyer, however. Or the dollar amount.