LJ;647125 wrote:You realize that is an internet term that was made up in the 2000's right? The actual and original phrase is Bald Faced Lie.

bold-faced
   /ˈboʊldˌfeɪst/ Show Spelled[bohld-feyst] Show IPA
–adjective
1.
impudent; brazen: He had the bold-faced effrontery to ask for a raise.
2.
Printing . (of type) having thick, heavy lines.
Use bold-faced in a Sentence
See images of bold-faced
Search bold-faced on the Web
Origin:
1585–95

Dictionary.com says otherwise.

And also, are you really going to try and argue semantics?

You should be able to comprehend what is glaringly and obviously being conveyed.

That is of course if youre still sticking to your side shooter that that your post about justin didnt include gochiefs of wes as bullet points at all.

Lol.

Ender Wiggin;647135 wrote:bold-faced
   /ˈboʊldˌfeɪst/ Show Spelled[bohld-feyst] Show IPA
–adjective
1.
impudent; brazen: He had the bold-faced effrontery to ask for a raise.
2.
Printing . (of type) having thick, heavy lines.
Use bold-faced in a Sentence
See images of bold-faced
Search bold-faced on the Web
Origin:
1585–95

Dictionary.com says otherwise.

So while my date is wrong {but this usage appears to be a more recent appropriation of the term} proves my point.

Any who, I was correcting you because "A barefaced (or bald-faced) lie is one that is obviously a lie to those hearing it." is what you were referring to was it not?

Ender Wiggin;647140 wrote:And also, are you really going to try and argue semantics?

You should be able to comprehend what is glaringly and obviously being conveyed.

That is of course if youre still sticking to your side shooter that that your post about justin didnt include gochiefs of wes as bullet points at all.

Lol.

Wow, you HIGHLY lack comprehension skills. The thread was about Justin. MY post was included Gochiefs.... but hey, I already explained this to you 100 times. Not to mention the fact that I never said what you are claiming. But hey, not unlike you.

Shit, guess you just destroyed me again.

LJ;647148 wrote:So while my date is wrong {but this usage appears to be a more recent appropriation of the term} proves my point.

Any who, I was correcting you because "A barefaced (or bald-faced) lie is one that is obviously a lie to those hearing it." is what you were referring to was it not?

Actually no its not. If you read the previous posts youd see the correlation. He basically said, with a bold face, something that is the exact opposite of what happened. He knew he was wrong, but decided to lie and try and play it up do to the emotional response that is already running through this topic.

LJ;647152 wrote:Wow, you HIGHLY lack comprehension skills. The thread was about Justin. MY post was included Gochiefs.... but hey, I already explained this to you 100 times. Not to mention the fact that I never said what you are claiming. But hey, not unlike you.

Shit, guess you just destroyed me again.

*yawn* Im sorry, I dont claim anything of anyone without backing it up. You are the one that is once again trying to spin words. I said you made a post about justin, gochiefs, and wes. You say its only about justin.

And now youre saying "I already explained it, blah blah bs" and are resorting to try and question my intelligence when you failed to do so several times already. Even included this last bit about bold faced.

But thats cool, you can continue to think you did something you clearly and with "physical" proof did not.

Whatever lets you sleep at night.

Ender Wiggin;647175 wrote:*yawn* Im sorry, I dont claim anything of anyone without backing it up. You are the one that is once again trying to spin words. I said you made a post about justin, gochiefs, and wes. You say its only about justin.

And now youre saying "I already explained it, blah blah bs" and are resorting to try and question my intelligence when you failed to do so several times already. Even included this last bit about bold faced.

But thats cool, you can continue to think you did something you clearly and with "physical" proof did not.

Whatever lets you sleep at night.

You make me LOL. You argue yourself in circles and it is hilarious. BTW, way to make shit up. I question your intelligence because it is obviously lacking. If it wasn't, you would be able to understand where you have been wrong tons of times. Sure, I will let it go that you want to use bold faced in that manner. I for one would use bald faced, but hey, are you going to attack me for my opinion?

"Fucking ChiefsMantooth hybrid..... "

Nothing to do with GoChiefs or Wes right?

You know, ive asked several times, you say im arguing with myself yet no one can give examples where. So once again ill ask where? You make the claim now back it up.

Ill also ask you to give an example where I made anything up. You question my intelligence, but you dont give any supporting reasons.

If ive been wrong "tons of times" give me some examples, surely if I was as much as youve said ive been you would be able to give maybe an example or two.

And no I dont attack people for their opinions, I unlike people here, can accept an opinion that is different than mine without attacking. You tried to say I was wrong, claimed the term has only been around for around a decade, and I showed you where you were incorrect, thats all. Wheres the attacking at?

I already know you wont provide any sort of proof, and I also know youll come back with some copout like im not smart or I cant comprehend or something else like that.

So once again, I will wait to see if you back up anything you say.

Ender Wiggin;647187 wrote:"Fucking ChiefsMantooth hybrid..... "

Nothing to do with GoChiefs or Wes right?

You know, ive asked several times, you say im arguing with myself yet no one can give examples where. So once again ill ask where? You make the claim now back it up.

Never said you were arguing with yourself

Ill also ask you to give an example where I made anything up. You question my intelligence, but you dont give any supporting reasons.

See above and

if youre still sticking to your side shooter that that your post about justin didnt include gochiefs of wes as bullet points at all.

I never said that either

If ive been wrong "tons of times" give me some examples, surely if I was as much as youve said ive been you would be able to give maybe an example or two.

About who my thread was about, about the meaning of indifferent and the meaning of hate

And no I dont attack people for their opinions, I unlike people here, can accept an opinion that is different than mine without attacking. You tried to say I was wrong, claimed the term has only been around for around a decade, and I showed you where you were incorrect, thats all. Wheres the attacking at?

Where did I say you attacked me for that?

I already know you wont provide any sort of proof, and I also know youll come back with some copout like im not smart or I cant comprehend or something else like that.

So once again, I will wait to see if you back up anything you say.

You make this too easy

LJ;647197 wrote:Never said you were arguing with yourself

LJ;647177 wrote:You make me LOL. You argue yourself in circles and it is hilarious.

Back it up please.

LJ;647197 wrote:See above and I never said that either

LJ;647197 wrote:BTW, way to make shit up.

Back it up please.

LJ;647197 wrote:About who my thread was about, about the meaning of indifferent and the meaning of hate

You made your own assumption and are trying to pass it off as fact. Dont do that. You came to the conclusion I hated cops, then used YOUR assumption to fuel your own agenda about the use of indifferent. That only makes sense to you. When I use the word hate, you will have a point, until then, you dont.

LJ;647177 wrote:Where did I say you attacked me for that?

LJ;647177 wrote:are you going to attack me for my opinion?

You ask me if Im going to attack you for your opinion on the basis of what exactly?

LJ;647177 wrote:You make this too easy

You did exactly what I said you would do. Like clockwork.

Back up your claims whenever you want.

I suck at multiquoting btw. Some of this is probably formatted wrong, but you should be able to comprehend it.

Ender Wiggin;647214 wrote:Back it up please.



Back it up please.


You made your own assumption and are trying to pass it off as fact. Dont do that. You came to the conclusion I hated cops, then used YOUR assumption to fuel your own agenda about the use of indifferent. That only makes sense to you. When I use the word hate, you will have a point, until then, you dont.



You ask me if Im going to attack you for your opinion on the basis of what exactly?


You did exactly what I said you would do. Like clockwork.

Back up your claims whenever you want.

WOW.....

I am done with this bullshit. You are an absolute nutjob. Go ahead and say you destroyed me, or that I bowed out or whatever you want, because I am bowing out, because you are WAY too fucking stupid for me to spend my time on you.

Ender Wiggin;647220 wrote:I suck at multiquoting btw. Some of this is probably formatted wrong, but you should be able to comprehend it.

Too bad you weren't able to comprehend anything I said

Lol, I just asked you to back up what you said, you made the claims but you never quoted examples yet you are going to try and turn it back on me? Riiiiiiiiiight.

Yep, calling me stupid, and a nutjob, and all the other garbage because you refuse to back up what you say.

Makes sense.

Dont start what you cant finish. Youve been doing it this whole time.

At least ytown was smart enough to stop posting when it was proven that he lied.

Whats your excuse?

LJ;647228 wrote:Too bad you weren't able to comprehend anything I said

I even called that you would do this.

And you are trying to talk down to me?

Let me know when I make a bold claim and dont back it up.

Thanks.

Bump for LJ, cool enough to call me names and try and deface me but not cool enough to back up his bold claims with examples.

Its funny that him and ytown both cant do that after their bold claims.

Just buping to see if LJ will finally back u the claims he made with any sort of fact

And ini bump to see what ytowns reason of making that story up was.

So did the criminal lose his license for breaking the rules of the road?

You wouldnt lose your license for an illegal left turn. Are you going to follow the sheep and post like fool?

There are a few people who posted intelligently here. If you are going to act like LJ and ytown and the others and get caught making shit up and not backing it up.....well just dont.

well I'd hope he'd lose it since he broke a law and the consequences I'm sure left his vision affected by the looks of those pics. I dont want him driving around he's likely to run into a baton again...and again...and again..

.....no one loses their license for an illegal left turn. Its obvious you are choosing to post like a foolish person and not like one of the intelligent posters that contributed here.

I expect nothing from you. Continue on as you wish.

Looks like we got another Big Gain (Paladin) on our hands.

Jester;650842 wrote:Looks like we got another Big Gain (Paladin) on our hands.

Whos that? Hows it relevant?

this