queencitybuckeye;624066 wrote:Yes, they were. Sorry it doesn't meet up with the world view that such things are decided on paper by the number of high school all-Americans, but they won five games over three weeks against the best competition available.

Disagree...no way was Butler the second best team last year

queencitybuckeye;624064 wrote:Did you watch it?

I watched about half of it in total, I kept flipping back and forth. The game was a snoozer. It didn't mean anything and Uconn sucked. It wasn't a game.

jordo212000;624314 wrote:I watched about half of it in total, I kept flipping back and forth. The game was a snoozer. It didn't mean anything and Uconn sucked. It wasn't a game.

If it "meant something", the game would still have sucked. Would that have changed how you watched it?

SportsAndLady;624306 wrote:Disagree...no way was Butler the second best team last year

I'll take the objective over the subjective every time. Unless you go to the "on paper" crap, no one has a better case.

queencitybuckeye;624316 wrote:If it "meant something", the game would still have sucked. Would that have changed how you watched it?

Yeah I would have been inclined to watch it because my team could have potentially squared off with them later in the playoffs. It's just hard to stay interested in a bloodbath when at the end of the game the winning team gets a "thanks for playing" trophy.

Mooney44Cards;623916 wrote:We have a playoff right now, its a 2-team playoff.

I hate when people say that. That isn't a playoff.

Mulva;624465 wrote:I hate when people say that. That isn't a playoff.

TCU agrees. 13-0 and the road ends.