data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jan 2, 2011 6:26pm
SNF
7-8 Rams travel to the 6-9 Seahawks....the winner will be the #4 seed and host the defending champion #5 seed New Orleans Saints
I have no clue...Seahawks are far improved at home.....but are 6-9 for a reason....the Rams seem to be fairly decent so I'll take the upstart Rams 24-19
7-8 Rams travel to the 6-9 Seahawks....the winner will be the #4 seed and host the defending champion #5 seed New Orleans Saints
I have no clue...Seahawks are far improved at home.....but are 6-9 for a reason....the Rams seem to be fairly decent so I'll take the upstart Rams 24-19
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19a0b/19a0bf089050b592c3fc9ecdd00dd779ae028d99" alt="dazedconfused's avatar"
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Jan 2, 2011 6:28pm
winner gets to be destroyed by the saints...yayyyy!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04070/040706bb489394922a49b721280970518891060e" alt="gerb131's avatar"
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Jan 2, 2011 6:32pm
Sam Bradford is good. Taking the Rams in this one.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ad4/55ad40c91c6d3630bb732eae806eaee6e71fb1c5" alt="wes_mantooth's avatar"
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Jan 2, 2011 8:33pm
I am not saying that Seattle will beat NO, but they have the best home field advantage in football...and it isn't even close.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bea38/bea3829fd9b5f5513575028759743363f1e617f8" alt="Terry_Tate's avatar"
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Jan 2, 2011 8:36pm
Any time you get a chance to take Charlie Whitehurst getting points at home you have to do it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jan 2, 2011 10:42pm
yeah...their homefield is great...but their team is not....NO will score 21+....I'm not sure Seattle can.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ad4/55ad40c91c6d3630bb732eae806eaee6e71fb1c5" alt="wes_mantooth's avatar"
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Jan 2, 2011 10:46pm
Ironman92;622540 wrote:yeah...their homefield is great...but their team is not....NO will score 21+....I'm not sure Seattle can.
yeah, I just think that they will be competitive for their home game. If it was in NO....NO would probably win by 30+.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jan 2, 2011 10:50pm
well they already played AT NO and lost 34-19....but their perceived homefield advantage.....
at home versus playoff type teams......in 3 HOME games vs the Giants, Chiefs and Falcons they were outscored 119-47.....but they were somewhat tight at NO...so who knows.
at home versus playoff type teams......in 3 HOME games vs the Giants, Chiefs and Falcons they were outscored 119-47.....but they were somewhat tight at NO...so who knows.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ad4/55ad40c91c6d3630bb732eae806eaee6e71fb1c5" alt="wes_mantooth's avatar"
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Jan 2, 2011 10:53pm
I also think it makes a big difference if Hasselbeck is playing in playoff time. That being said....I still believe they lose.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4ba0/a4ba0d9cff94d2e863d68378e1b2e6253bde6350" alt="killer_ewok's avatar"
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Jan 2, 2011 10:53pm
Charlie Whitehurst looks like some crazy ass Johnny Depp character.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c82f/4c82f388828d7e06ea92094f65fae35c079e28c8" alt="Hb31187's avatar"
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Jan 2, 2011 10:56pm
Lol nice catch Alexander
M
mhs95_06
Posts: 8,167
Jan 2, 2011 10:59pm
Receiver ineptness killing Bradford and the Rams.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6279a/6279a79e94f1e2e19fcb29ab0aa5cf6ac24d47a6" alt="Tigerfan00's avatar"
Tigerfan00
Posts: 3,427
Jan 2, 2011 11:00pm
These offenses are just bad to watch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ad4/55ad40c91c6d3630bb732eae806eaee6e71fb1c5" alt="wes_mantooth's avatar"
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Jan 2, 2011 11:07pm
holy shit...it really looks like we are going to have a 7-9 playoff team.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c82f/4c82f388828d7e06ea92094f65fae35c079e28c8" alt="Hb31187's avatar"
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Jan 2, 2011 11:09pm
Lol you know that had to hurt
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ad4/55ad40c91c6d3630bb732eae806eaee6e71fb1c5" alt="wes_mantooth's avatar"
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Jan 2, 2011 11:11pm
lol...he looked like he was a yard short on that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdd58/bdd58d85797e0a3c6dc786c956196d5cb593189f" alt="shook_17's avatar"
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Jan 2, 2011 11:23pm
what a boring ass game. thats all i have to say. guess it doesn't matter NO will knock seattle out next week.
I
ironman02
Posts: 4,989
Jan 2, 2011 11:24pm
Looks like the 7-9 Seahawks will be hosting the Saints.
That spot on the 2nd and short was definitely generous, but they did pick up about 2 yards on the next play, so it probably wouldn't have mattered. Collinsworth is acting like it was a 4th and 1 and the officials cost the Rams the game.
That spot on the 2nd and short was definitely generous, but they did pick up about 2 yards on the next play, so it probably wouldn't have mattered. Collinsworth is acting like it was a 4th and 1 and the officials cost the Rams the game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdd58/bdd58d85797e0a3c6dc786c956196d5cb593189f" alt="shook_17's avatar"
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Jan 2, 2011 11:28pm
7-9 and going to the playoffs andd they get to host the game, what a joke.
V
Vinqtin
Posts: 13
Jan 2, 2011 11:30pm
Those are two putrid teams. Tamp and the Giants got to be PO'd.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff509/ff509c258ec4ff4b2d9cb2b9a76ce97e3adfb774" alt="chicago510's avatar"
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Jan 2, 2011 11:31pm
Ok that was pathetic. Saints by 20
I
ironman02
Posts: 4,989
Jan 2, 2011 11:31pm
Yep, first division winner in NFL history to have a losing record.
Watch them upset the defending champs now. Well, maybe not. New Orleans should absolutely shred their D.
Watch them upset the defending champs now. Well, maybe not. New Orleans should absolutely shred their D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdd58/bdd58d85797e0a3c6dc786c956196d5cb593189f" alt="shook_17's avatar"
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Jan 2, 2011 11:32pm
was it just me or did bradford look like captain check down tonight?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a39d6/a39d6b2f3b3a8b8e4d695c0bafb5e6cc313c8914" alt="End of Line's avatar"
End of Line
Posts: 6,867
Jan 2, 2011 11:37pm
Saints by 28
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Jan 3, 2011 12:53am
He looked like captain "I put the ball in my receiver's hands a bunch and they dropped them".shook_17;622621 wrote:was it just me or did bradford look like captain check down tonight?