I guess Rich Rodriguez's Extra Practice time wasn't so bad huh?

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ I guess Rich Rodriguez's Extra Practice time wasn't so bad huh?
B

bigkahuna

Senior Member

4,454 posts
Dec 24, 2010 10:23 AM
In light of the allegations brought about the OSU players exchanging autographs for gifts and selling property (gold pants, rings...), the players in Iowa City failing drug tests, the early agent communications, and the Can Newton fiasco...

It doesn't seem to be that big of a deal anymore that Rich Rodriguez and Michigan got in trouble for breaking the rules on practice time.

I'm just kidding around. This is meant to be a joke, so don't come in here and get your panties in a twist.
Dec 24, 2010 10:23am
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
Dec 24, 2010 10:34 AM
Yeah, it seems interesting the very different approaches the NCAA has taken to this various issues. Failing a drug test is a serious issue because you aren't just breaking a rule, you're breaking the law. Cam Newton's father tried to extort a very large sum of money from a university in exchange for his son's commitment to play there, which could be criminal. Taking extra required time at practice could give a team a competitive advantage. Selling your own personal property though? Well, there's nothing illegal about that. And apparently the stuff they sold technically is the property of the university until they leave school (which is why it was against the rules for them to sell it). At least that's the way it sounded when Gene Smith explained everything yesterday.
Dec 24, 2010 10:34am
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
Dec 24, 2010 10:48 AM
"(which is why it was illegal for them to sell it)."

As QCB pointed out yesterday, there isn't anything illegal about it. The NCAA, or OSU, can't force them to reverse the transaction. But if a student-athlete engages in that activity they risk their eligibility.
Dec 24, 2010 10:48am
B

Bigdogg

Senior Member

1,429 posts
Dec 24, 2010 11:02 AM
Yes I hope Michigan extends Dick rod's contract right away>
Dec 24, 2010 11:02am
gerb131's avatar

gerb131

Senior Member

9,932 posts
Dec 24, 2010 11:03 AM
Just glad Tressel didn't cry.
Dec 24, 2010 11:03am
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
Dec 24, 2010 11:08 AM
Manhattan Buckeye;612541 wrote:"(which is why it was illegal for them to sell it)."

As QCB pointed out yesterday, there isn't anything illegal about it. The NCAA, or OSU, can't force them to reverse the transaction. But if a student-athlete engages in that activity they risk their eligibility.

I didn't really mean illegal. I meant illegal in the eyes of the NCAA (against the rules). It was a poor word choice on my part. I changed it.
Dec 24, 2010 11:08am
C

centralbucksfan

Senior Member

5,111 posts
Dec 24, 2010 11:12 AM
So we are now comparing kids selling something they own, to down right cheating (extra practice time, steroids and soliciting during recruiting). Oh wait...just kidding, its all the same. ;)
Dec 24, 2010 11:12am
Mr. Russell's avatar

Mr. Russell

Senior Member

422 posts
Dec 24, 2010 11:14 AM
Ohio State fans are such hypocrites.
Dec 24, 2010 11:14am
C

centralbucksfan

Senior Member

5,111 posts
Dec 24, 2010 11:16 AM
Mr. Russell;612563 wrote:Ohio State fans are such hypocrites.

Well smart guy, please explain? Not one OSU fan is condoning what these guys did. Many want them gone, or hope they bolt to the NFL. But don't make this out to be something bigger then it is as its not. They didn't get any kind of advantage on the field for selling these items.
Dec 24, 2010 11:16am
Skyhook79's avatar

Skyhook79

Senior Member

5,739 posts
Dec 24, 2010 11:55 AM
No, what RichRod did is still worse. All that extra practice time and michigan still sucks.
Dec 24, 2010 11:55am
darbypitcher22's avatar

darbypitcher22

Senior Member

8,000 posts
Dec 24, 2010 11:58 AM
centralbucksfan;612561 wrote:So we are now comparing kids selling something they own, to down right cheating (extra practice time, steroids and soliciting during recruiting). Oh wait...just kidding, its all the same. ;)

But remember now, they didn't own it
Dec 24, 2010 11:58am
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Dec 24, 2010 12:45 PM
gerb131;612553 wrote:Just glad Tressel didn't cry.
LOL--and say "I really want to be an Ohio guy"...let tsun keep the scumbag--I'll take the Senator any day :cool:
Dec 24, 2010 12:45pm
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Dec 24, 2010 4:11 PM
This BS doesn't reflect on Tress in anyway...this is the solitary work of six selfish, self-entiltled assholes who should never be allowed to set foot on another athletic field involving OSU sports (take our chances in the Sugar Bowl with players who abide by the rules).

DickRod should never be mentioned in the same breath as Tress. FU kahuna.
Dec 24, 2010 4:11pm
N

norwalk

Senior Member

158 posts
Dec 24, 2010 4:25 PM
DickRod a head coach breaks the rules.

6 athletes break the rules.

Which is worse? Your head coach breaking the rules or players who you can't watch 24/7 breaking the rules?
Dec 24, 2010 4:25pm
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Dec 24, 2010 4:29 PM
How does this not reflect Tress in any way? Players do great things on the field and win games for him and the university, the coach gets some of the credit. Players do stupid shit off the field...the coach and university get some of the heat. Cant have the good without the bad
Dec 24, 2010 4:29pm
Y-Town Steelhound's avatar

Y-Town Steelhound

Underrated

1,388 posts
Dec 24, 2010 4:43 PM
Hb31187;612795 wrote:How does this not reflect Tress in any way? Players do great things on the field and win games for him and the university, the coach gets some of the credit. Players do stupid shit off the field...the coach and university get some of the heat. Cant have the good without the bad

Could not disagree more with this statement. One has to do with the game of football, the other is completely separate from the field and/or game of football. Jim Tressel is paid to be the head coach of the football team at The Ohio State University....not the babysitter.
Dec 24, 2010 4:43pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
Dec 24, 2010 5:10 PM
Hb31187;612795 wrote:How does this not reflect Tress in any way? Players do great things on the field and win games for him and the university, the coach gets some of the credit. Players do stupid shit off the field...the coach and university get some of the heat. Cant have the good without the bad

What the players did gives OSU no advantage on the field. Aside from a stupid rule,the stuff they sold was their own.

What Richrod did was an attempt to get a competitive advantage and he's a coach, not an 18-22 year old kid.

See the difference?
Dec 24, 2010 5:10pm
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Dec 24, 2010 5:17 PM
Writerbuckeye;612826 wrote:What the players did gives OSU no advantage on the field. Aside from a stupid rule,the stuff they sold was their own.

What Richrod did was an attempt to get a competitive advantage and he's a coach, not an 18-22 year old kid.

See the difference?
I wasnt comparing this situation to Rich Rods. Im saying when kids in your program do stupid shit, like it or not, it makes the coach, and school look bad. Bc above it was said this doesnt reflect Tressel or OSU...or something along those lines

Much like when the kids do great things, it makes the coach and school look good
Dec 24, 2010 5:17pm