wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Dec 20, 2010 10:46pm
Automatik;608780 wrote:I agree, you don't give up the opening kick for a TD and you are in the money. It still doesn't give an excuse for poor officiating.
no excuse for poor officiating, but it is going on all over the league. I think the problem that most have is that some(not all) of these Steelers fans on here are saying that this garbage officiating is only going against the Steelers and it is done with intent to screw them...which is retarded. The officiating needs to be looked at seriously in the offseason...no one will debate that.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 20, 2010 10:46pm
justincredible;608777 wrote:Non, please respond to this post.
well, the penalty on Clark I think turned the Jets drive from a FG to touchown to make it 17-17
so let's say the Jets lead 10-6 at halftime...Steelers only get two FGs
Steelers drive down in the second half to make it 13-10
Jets kick FG 13-13
Jets add FG and safety 18-13
Steelers drive down for TD and win 20-18
that's how it should read in the books
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 20, 2010 10:48pm
Non;608788 wrote:well, the penalty on Clark I think turned the Jets drive from a FG to touchown to make it 17-17
so let's say the Jets lead 10-6 at halftime...Steelers only get two FGs
Steelers drive down in the second half to make it 13-10
Jets kick FG 13-13
Jets add FG and safety 18-13
Steelers drive down for TD and win 20-18
that's how it should read in the books
Hmmm...it's weird that it reads 22-17, though.
D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Dec 20, 2010 10:48pm
Non;608788 wrote:well, the penalty on Clark I think turned the Jets drive from a FG to touchown to make it 17-17
so let's say the Jets lead 10-6 at halftime...Steelers only get two FGs
Steelers drive down in the second half to make it 13-10
Jets kick FG 13-13
Jets add FG and safety 18-13
Steelers drive down for TD and win 20-18
that's how it should read in the books
How should the Dolphins game read?
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 20, 2010 10:48pm
I remember when you still had your sanity. I liked that guy much better.
Jester
Posts: 700
Dec 20, 2010 10:49pm
I'm still waiting for you to prove the holding calls. Whether it be the play you first mentioned, or the last two plays since you said you believed holding took place there as well.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Dec 20, 2010 10:50pm
justincredible;608793 wrote:I remember when you still had your sanity. I liked that guy much better.
I think automatik is correct...he is just baiting...there is no way this crazy talk is for real.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 20, 2010 10:56pm
Jester;608794 wrote:I'm still waiting for you to prove the holding calls. Whether it be the play you first mentioned, or the last two plays since you said you believed holding took place there as well.
Revis had two hands in the back of the receiver on a previous play. That one was borderline but so was Clark's hit and they called that one.
I don't think even justin would deny that Lowery got away with a hold against Sanders. It was one that you just can't miss in that situation.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 20, 2010 10:56pm
I didn't record the game or I would have them all up here already.
Jester
Posts: 700
Dec 20, 2010 10:57pm
I'm not asking for your opinion or what you think happened. I'm asking for solid proof. Pics, vids, anything. If you're going to make outrageous claims, at least have something to back it up. If not, then stfu.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 20, 2010 10:58pm
justincredible;608789 wrote:Hmmm...it's weird that it reads 22-17, though.
it is weird, but better yet, a disgrace
to all those who play or watch the game
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 20, 2010 11:00pm
Jester;608806 wrote:I'm not asking for your opinion or what you think happened. I'm asking for solid proof. Pics, vids, anything. If you're going to make outrageous claims, at least have something to back it up. If not, then stfu.
if you didn't watch the game, you stfu
those that watched know what I'm talking about
they don't need proof, the replays were in slow motion and the jersey is being pulled
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 20, 2010 11:00pm
non, please respond to this post.
justincredible;608779 wrote:Three yards? The CB has a 9 foot arm in order to tug on the jersey?
Jester
Posts: 700
Dec 20, 2010 11:03pm
why should i stfu? I'm not the one making stupid claims.Non;608811 wrote:if you didn't watch the game, you stfu
those that watched know what I'm talking about
they don't need proof, the replays were in slow motion and the jersey is being pulled
and really? cuz im pretty sure the majority doesn't feel the same way you do.
then find the replays. dont make claims you can't back up.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 20, 2010 11:07pm
Jester;608817 wrote:why should i stfu? I'm not the one making stupid claims.
and really? cuz im pretty sure the majority doesn't feel the same way you do.
then find the replays. dont make claims you can't back up.
everyone who watched the game knows that I'm right about the holding
there's no need to dig for the replay, it was that obvious when it happened
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 20, 2010 11:07pm
Non;608809 wrote:it is weird, but better yet, a disgrace
to all those who play or watch the game
Just like the disgrace in the books after the dolphins game.
Jester
Posts: 700
Dec 20, 2010 11:09pm
lol. so what youre saying is, you cant prove it.Non;608832 wrote:everyone who watched the game knows that I'm right about the holding
there's no need to dig for the replay, it was that obvious when it happened
exactly what i thought.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 20, 2010 11:13pm
justincredible;608812 wrote:non, please respond to this post.
I was exaggerating. The distance is not that important.
The officials should be watching the game, especially a downfield DB vs. receiver play in the final minute of a close game.
Missing a call of that magnitude has too much of an influence on the outcome.
Pity too because it was a competitive game but we didn't get a fair, legitimate finish.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 20, 2010 11:14pm
Jester;608834 wrote:lol. so what youre saying is, you cant prove it.
exactly what i thought.
I already said I didn't record it.
When it's on the web somewhere I'll post it.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 20, 2010 11:16pm
Non;608840 wrote: Pity too because it was a competitive game but we didn't get a fair, legitimate finish.
Neither did the dolphins.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Dec 20, 2010 11:26pm
justincredible;608845 wrote:Neither did the dolphins.
Dolphins got the benefit of the calls throughout that game to make it close to begin with
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 20, 2010 11:29pm
Non;608857 wrote:Dolphins got the benefit of the calls throughout that game to make it close to begin with
Of course they did.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Dec 20, 2010 11:32pm
lol...this really seems like an exercise in futility....
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 20, 2010 11:34pm
wes_mantooth;608867 wrote:lol...this really seems like an exercise in futility....
Yeah, I'm done now. Non is either baiting or he has completely lost his mind. Hopefully he's just baiting.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Dec 20, 2010 11:41pm
I don't think the Dolphin's bad call is really comparable here. It was a missed call on TD that was close. Unfortunately for Miami there was no evidence for the call to be overturned.
I can't recall any bad goal line decisions this year, besides that one. All of my complaints are with actual penalties called or uncalled.
I can't recall any bad goal line decisions this year, besides that one. All of my complaints are with actual penalties called or uncalled.