
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 15, 2010 9:48pm
Boom. Roasted.

Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Dec 16, 2010 7:41am
QQ is actually from Warcraft not WOW. But I can see how u prolly figured it was WOW if he just said Warcraft.

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Dec 16, 2010 8:57am
sleeper;602389 wrote:Ok nerd. Who gives a shit?
I always come back, bank it.
If you're going to use a meme, you might as well get it right.
But then again, that'd require you having a clue.

sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 16, 2010 12:09pm
Fly4Fun;602784 wrote:If you're going to use a meme, you might as well get it right.
But then again, that'd require you having a clue.
That meme has no relation to QQ dumb shit.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=QQ
Now go find "cry moar noob"
Owned and ruined.

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Dec 16, 2010 12:29pm
sleeper;601963 wrote:Also means "Cry more noob"
sleeper;602937 wrote:That meme has no relation to QQ dumb shit.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=QQ
Now go find "cry moar noob"
Owned and ruined.
You were the one that brought up the phrase in relation to QQ... not me. You effectively just called yourself a "dumb shit" and said you "owned and ruined" to yourself. Congratulations on being a tard.

justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 16, 2010 7:33pm


sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 16, 2010 9:27pm
Fly4Fun;602966 wrote:You were the one that brought up the phrase in relation to QQ... not me. You effectively just called yourself a "dumb shit" and said you "owned and ruined" to yourself. Congratulations on being a tard.
The meme's are completely different. "Cry moar noob" has no relation to QQ in any way, and you trying to pass it off as such is completely laughable, didn't you go to Dartmouth? LOL, what a joke.

FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Dec 16, 2010 9:30pm
sleeper;603599 wrote:The meme's are completely different. "Cry moar noob" has no relation to QQ in any way, and you trying to pass it off as such is completely laughable, didn't you go to Dartmouth? LOL, what a joke.
I think you might have a point if he posted "Cry moar noob" to your QQ post, but it was in reference to your "cry more noob" post. I don't think he ever referenced your QQ posts.

justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 16, 2010 9:54pm
FatHobbit;603602 wrote:I think you might have a point if he posted "Cry moar noob" to your QQ post, but it was in reference to your "cry more noob" post. I don't think he ever referenced your QQ posts.
Don't question sleeper. He went to OSU. He's smarter than you.

sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 16, 2010 10:15pm
It's like talking to a bunch of idiots. I understand "cry moar noob" is an meme, but QQ also means "cry more noob" and is completely different. Did anyone check the link? Probably not since you're too busy sniffing FLY4FUN's ass.

justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 16, 2010 10:42pm
Smells like cinnamon.

justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 16, 2010 10:44pm
Did you check the link?
Originally started in Warcraft, where Alt+QQ is a hotkey to quiting the game.
When someone bitches or whines everyone would say 'QQ', telling them to quit the game because they suck so much.
It often confuses people into thinking that it means, "Cry more noob", but this is totally incorrect. The fact that 'QQ' looks like a pair of teary eyes is just a mere coincidence.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Dec 16, 2010 10:50pm
Do I know you? Because I've rarely seen people use the...in HD phrase.enigmaax;592041 wrote:total pwnage.....in HD

sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 17, 2010 1:25am
justincredible;603690 wrote:Did you check the link?

Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Dec 17, 2010 6:39am
justincredible;603690 wrote:Did you check the link?
I don't think he's admitted he's wrong a single time, u think he's gonna start now?

FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Dec 17, 2010 9:16am
justincredible;603641 wrote:Don't question sleeper. He went to OSU. He's smarter than you.
I graduated from OSU.

justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 17, 2010 11:42am
sleeper;603801 wrote:QQ


se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Dec 17, 2010 1:24pm
I just assumed they were the same thing...lol!Rotinaj;602743 wrote:QQ is actually from Warcraft not WOW. But I can see how u prolly figured it was WOW if he just said Warcraft.

justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 17, 2010 1:27pm
se-alum;604229 wrote:I just assumed they were the same thing...lol!
lol n00b

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Dec 17, 2010 2:10pm
se-alum;604229 wrote:I just assumed they were the same thing...lol!
Before the RPG's there were real time strategy (RTS) games. There was WarCraft, WarCraft II, then StarCraft (similar game, was a real time strategy based game but set in space instead of Orcs vs. Humans) then WarCraft III. World of WarCraft (WoW) is an MMORPG (Massive Multiplayer On-line Role Playing Game) and is more like Diablo (RPG) and Diablo II (MMORPG and RPG). Recently StarCraft II (RTS) came out to big fanfare this past Summer.
Blizzards next big release is going to be Diablo III... another MMORPG.
The WoW MMORPG is a quite impressive game, but almost too good because of it's easily addictive nature as opposed to the RTS (Real-Time Strategy) version of Blizzard games which are equally impressive visually and game play but don't require a person to play 3-4 hours MINIMUM a day to play at a "high level."
Now you know more about the Blizzard franchise of games than you wanted to.

Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Dec 17, 2010 2:13pm
I remember playing the very first WarCraft. I won using the excellent strategy of punching in the god code and then steamrolling the opposition with my invulnerable force of immortals. After that, I figured that I'd completely mastered RTS games and felt no urge to ever play one again!
Or, for a counterpoint, I realized I sucked at RTS games and stuck with turn-based strategy like Fire Emblem, Shining Force and Final Fantasy Tactics.
Or, for a counterpoint, I realized I sucked at RTS games and stuck with turn-based strategy like Fire Emblem, Shining Force and Final Fantasy Tactics.

Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Dec 17, 2010 2:46pm
Shining force was the shit!!!

justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Dec 17, 2010 2:47pm
Fly4Fun;604272 wrote:Before the RPG's there were real time strategy (RTS) games. There was WarCraft, WarCraft II, then StarCraft (similar game, was a real time strategy based game but set in space instead of Orcs vs. Humans) then WarCraft III. World of WarCraft (WoW) is an MMORPG (Massive Multiplayer On-line Role Playing Game) and is more like Diablo (RPG) and Diablo II (MMORPG and RPG). Recently StarCraft II (RTS) came out to big fanfare this past Summer.
Blizzards next big release is going to be Diablo III... another MMORPG.
The WoW MMORPG is a quite impressive game, but almost too good because of it's easily addictive nature as opposed to the RTS (Real-Time Strategy) version of Blizzard games which are equally impressive visually and game play but don't require a person to play 3-4 hours MINIMUM a day to play at a "high level."
Now you know more about the Blizzard franchise of games than you wanted to.
Heretic;604275 wrote:I remember playing the very first WarCraft. I won using the excellent strategy of punching in the god code and then steamrolling the opposition with my invulnerable force of immortals. After that, I figured that I'd completely mastered RTS games and felt no urge to ever play one again!
Or, for a counterpoint, I realized I sucked at RTS games and stuck with turn-based strategy like Fire Emblem, Shining Force and Final Fantasy Tactics.
Nerds.

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Dec 17, 2010 2:57pm
justincredible;604301 wrote:Nerds.
Haha, I don't play anymore... although I did buy StarCraft II and play that for a few weeks before I got too busy with school. I might play that a bit again over break.

Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Dec 17, 2010 2:58pm
justincredible;604301 wrote:Nerds.
Look! I only played games for FIVE FUCKING HOURS last night. That is completely normal.