V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 19, 2010 2:20pm
listen to him every day--agree with him 50% of the time, but still listen....and IMO, that's what it's all about with Cowherd.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Nov 19, 2010 2:32pm
And that has to do with what? That was 9 yrs ago son.krambman;565754 wrote:When did OSU fire John Cooper?
T
trep14
Posts: 842
Nov 19, 2010 3:30pm
Tiernan;565744 wrote:Listen to him every day and like him or not the guy is freakishly accurate on predictions...which is what has me worried this weekend...he is calling an Iowa upset over the Bucks.
Take some comfort, he was wrong about this prediction regarding Durant and Oden :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LulSsTbflGU
Granted, nearly everyone was saying this at the time.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Nov 19, 2010 3:32pm
karen lotz;565632 wrote:Cowherd also said Mrs Doubtfire is the greatest comedy of all time.
I SURE THE FUCK HOPE YOU'RE NOT DISAGREEING WITH THIS!!!!!!!
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Nov 19, 2010 3:34pm
Heretic;565860 wrote:I SURE THE FUCK HOPE YOU'RE NOT DISAGREEING WITH THIS!!!!!!!
You were just inspired by tits on fire.
krambman
Posts: 3,606
Nov 19, 2010 3:58pm
thedynasty1998;565759 wrote:His system is basically to score points, which they are doing. He just needs a defensive coordinator, needs guys to quit getting hurt and needs to recruit defensive players and not just "athletes".
I still think he can have success in the Big 10, but his defense is holding him back.
The thing about his offense though is that it's so reliant on the talent that he has. His offense can score lots of points (like it's done this year) if he has the right kind of athletes in his system. When he doesn't have a Pat White or Denard Robinson taking the snaps his offense isn't as effective. The only problem with this is that it really limits the pool of talent that Michigan can recruit from. They can't go after the best quarterback available because if it's someone like Ryan Mallet he won't fit their system. He can only go after the best mobile QB available. That means fewer players to recruit from with just as many teams going after them. A school like Ohio State that doesn't run one specific offensive system can be successful and win games with a game manager like Krenzel, a running QB like Smith, a pocket passer like Boeckman, or a hybrid like Pryor.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Nov 19, 2010 4:13pm
krambman;565908 wrote:The thing about his offense though is that it's so reliant on the talent that he has. His offense can score lots of points (like it's done this year) if he has the right kind of athletes in his system. When he doesn't have a Pat White or Denard Robinson taking the snaps his offense isn't as effective. The only problem with this is that it really limits the pool of talent that Michigan can recruit from. They can't go after the best quarterback available because if it's someone like Ryan Mallet he won't fit their system. He can only go after the best mobile QB available. That means fewer players to recruit from with just as many teams going after them. A school like Ohio State that doesn't run one specific offensive system can be successful and win games with a game manager like Krenzel, a running QB like Smith, a pocket passer like Boeckman, or a hybrid like Pryor.
This is and has been my thoughts as well. The Denards and Pat Whites won't be there every year. I just don't know whether or not the AD, alumni etc. take this into consideration. Then of course there could be the drop in sending players to the league, always been high at UM. I could be wrong, but I don't see that number staying high should they continue to run this system.
darbypitcher22
Posts: 8,000
Nov 19, 2010 4:45pm
I think he's gotta win one or the other to keep his job. He hasn't performed well in big games either at Michigan, let alone winning ( I don't consider one win over Notre Dame a big game when both teams were down). If they lose, they better lose in double OT or something crazy by 3 pts or less and at least show his club was in the game
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 19, 2010 6:28pm
I remember a few years ago during the Kobe "i want to be traded" fiasco, Colin on his radio show stated he heard from a VERY RELIABLE source that Kobe just got traded (never gave specifics).
C
centralbucksfan
Posts: 5,111
Nov 19, 2010 6:51pm
I have heard from someone I know up in AnnArbor that rumors are going around that UM basically has a buyout check waiting once the season is over. He said that big money UM people want RR out as soon as possible. I don't know how valid it is, could be just a rumor...but I know that he isn't a personal favorite of too many at UM. If he loses the last two games, him getting canned isn't out of the question with all thats gone on at UM the past three years.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 20, 2010 1:50am
Michigan isn't going to beat Ohio State, with or without RichRod, and not just this year, but for a long..long..long long time.
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Nov 20, 2010 1:59am
The guy just needs a defense. Really that's all they need because Denard Robinson is probably the best playmaker in College Football but man they can't stop anyone
B
Bigdogg
Posts: 1,429
Nov 20, 2010 9:46am
Nooooo Dick Rod must stay!!!
krambman
Posts: 3,606
Nov 20, 2010 9:53am
Herbie just said on GameDay that the one thing that would shock him today would be if Michigan forces Wisconsin to punt at all today.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Nov 21, 2010 9:54am
one down, one more to go....the clock is ticking Dickie. Better go down behind Wal Mart and get some moving boxes this week.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Nov 21, 2010 10:02am
krambman;565908 wrote:The thing about his offense though is that it's so reliant on the talent that he has. His offense can score lots of points (like it's done this year) if he has the right kind of athletes in his system. When he doesn't have a Pat White or Denard Robinson taking the snaps his offense isn't as effective. The only problem with this is that it really limits the pool of talent that Michigan can recruit from. They can't go after the best quarterback available because if it's someone like Ryan Mallet he won't fit their system. He can only go after the best mobile QB available. That means fewer players to recruit from with just as many teams going after them. A school like Ohio State that doesn't run one specific offensive system can be successful and win games with a game manager like Krenzel, a running QB like Smith, a pocket passer like Boeckman, or a hybrid like Pryor.
The only thing that makes me scratch my head about this statement....how good would OSU's offense be without TP? Auburn without Cam?
Don't most teams recruit talent that fits their system? Or just talent in general?
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Nov 21, 2010 10:03am
Tiernan;569116 wrote:one down, one more to go....the clock is ticking Dickie. Better go down behind Wal Mart and get some moving boxes this week.
Perhaps the best thing for Michigan's program would be OSU beating them 100-0 next week.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Nov 21, 2010 10:07am
Most teams have systems that allow at least a little flexibility. You're well aware that Rich Rod's system is fairly finite. So talent in general is more likely the case.WebFire;569126 wrote:The only thing that makes me scratch my head about this statement....how good would OSU's offense be without TP? Auburn without Cam?
Don't most teams recruit talent that fits their system? Or just talent in general?
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Nov 21, 2010 10:53am
ytownfootball;569131 wrote:Most teams have systems that allow at least a little flexibility. You're well aware that Rich Rod's system is fairly finite. So talent in general is more likely the case.
I understand the point. But I think it's fair to say if you take most teams' best player away it would hurt them. I think the point is exaggerated a bit in krambman's post. Michigan seems to do fine with Forcier in, and he's not the same type as Robinson.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Nov 21, 2010 10:58am
I agree to an extent. But Tate seems to throw the bad, bad pick at points where it kills them. IDK it's kinda tough to pass judgment given the lack of playing time to compare.WebFire;569186 wrote:I understand the point. But I think it's fair to say if you take most teams' best player away it would hurt them. I think the point is exaggerated a bit in krambman's post. Michigan seems to do fine with Forcier in, and he's not the same type as Robinson.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Nov 21, 2010 11:07am
ytownfootball;569193 wrote:I agree to an extent. But Tate seems to throw the bad, bad pick at points where it kills them. IDK it's kinda tough to pass judgment given the lack of playing time to compare.
Yes, yes he does. But he runs the "system" just fine.
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Nov 21, 2010 11:20am
Tiernan;565744 wrote:Listen to him every day and like him or not the guy is freakishly accurate on predictions...which is what has me worried this weekend...he is calling an Iowa upset over the Bucks.
How did this prediction turn out?
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Nov 21, 2010 11:22am
I think Rich Rod gets 1 more season and the final on his contract, but I think he is gone after next year. There doesn't look to be much hope for his defense to get better anytime soon and the team will endure a similar season next year as they have this year.
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Nov 21, 2010 11:23am
Freakishly inaccurate I think.royal_k;569212 wrote:How did this prediction turn out?
ICEMAN59
Posts: 160
Nov 21, 2010 2:27pm
Cowherd is a clown . . . a master at stating (and constantly restating) the obvious, but as if it's some incredible insight.
Clowns makes clowny predictions. Therefore, Rich Rod will not lose his job.
Clowns makes clowny predictions. Therefore, Rich Rod will not lose his job.