WebFire;562199 wrote:Then your statement is invalid. The ban on Four Loko is the selling of.
Besides, I don't think we need to rehash the difference again.
It is not invalid. The rehash should never end, if not here, in the courts or a political office. Banning is banning, no matter the method or issue. When precedent is set, it slides on down and spreads out to other areas.
I don't have a problem with the people of a state voting on an issue like this. It's our right. The people in the state of Washington should have had their voices heard regarding whether they want FL legal.
If they want a nanny state, then nothing will be heard about this again from them. If they have huge problems with this, then the argument will continue and it won't just end here.
Besides, this thread is precisely the type of thread that invites people not only to bitch/complain/laugh about the situation, but also a chance to explain WHY they have their reactions. If you do not want to go over this again, then don't participate, or at least ignore whatever I post. It matters not to me.
I however think this is very interesting and involves a great deal more than a cut and dried situation, long term. Hence, why I participated, which I'm allowed to do, seeing as how I'm not breaking any rules to do so.