The WAC Just got THAT much Stronger....lol

College Sports 39 replies 1,604 views
Ty Webb's avatar
Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Nov 11, 2010 5:20pm
sjmvsfscs08;554031 wrote:You're a very dumb person.

+1
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Nov 11, 2010 8:37pm
enigmaax;554069 wrote:Yeah, I can't wait til they go undefeated in the WAC and everyone complains about how they should be in the national title game.
They'd have to go undefeated, win a BCS Bowl Game, and have their star player purpose to his g/f after the game first.
Little Danny's avatar
Little Danny
Posts: 4,288
Nov 11, 2010 8:42pm
There's going to be a number of I-AA schools make the move in the next few years. Montana is expected to get an invite to the WAC as well. Also, look for Delaware, Villanova, UMASS, Appy State and some others to step up as well in various conferences (ie. MAC, Sunbelt, C-USA, Nova to the BE).

I wouldn't laugh at those Texas schools. In a few years, they are going to be programs on the rise. They play in large markets, are in fertile recruiting territory, a part of the country with a growing population and they already have a pretty good size alumni base.
karen lotz's avatar
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Nov 11, 2010 8:44pm
I thought I read that Montana would have been officially invited to join the WAC now but wished to remain FCS.










Edit: FCS, not FBS...
B
bigkahuna
Posts: 4,454
Nov 11, 2010 8:47pm
karen lotz;554323 wrote:I thought I read that Montana would have been officially invited to join the WAC now but wished to remain FBS.

I read that on ESPN today as well. They thought it was best for them to stay I-AA. I think that they could possibly go if Montana State made the move as well because the AD said they really wanted to keep the cross state rivalry going. It would look bad for ANY I-A school to have a rival I-AA school.
Little Danny's avatar
Little Danny
Posts: 4,288
Nov 11, 2010 8:48pm
Hot off the presses today... I stand corrected about Montana. Does not mean the others teams will not make a move though. They are putting a lot of $$ into their football programs as of late.

http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0oG7m2wnNxMDrgAqWdXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTBzZmNmZGg5BHNlYwNzYwRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkA0RGUjVfOTQ-/SIG=1331rr8su/EXP=1289612848/**http%3a//www.standard.net/topics/sports/2010/11/11/montana-decides-stay-big-sky-0
redfalcon's avatar
redfalcon
Posts: 1,088
Nov 11, 2010 11:03pm
There has been speculation for years about Montana making the move, and I bet they will eventually, but they want Montana State to come as well. Watch for the MWC to steal at least one more team from the WAC sometime in the next couple of years, and then we will see what happens.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Nov 12, 2010 12:13am
bigkahuna;554306 wrote:They'd have to go undefeated, win a BCS Bowl Game, and have their star player purpose to his g/f after the game first.

Not now. We've already established that the WAC is a viable conference slate for national championship contenders.
se-alum's avatar
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Nov 12, 2010 1:51am
gerb131;553955 wrote:Thats a pretty good hire really. He is a whack job but he had some years and he's a household name. Surprised no mention of him and Minny job.

What D1 team would hire this guy? He had the most talented team, possibly in NCAA history, and couldn't pull off a win against the Bucks. I love my Bucks, but they had no business beating that loaded Miami team.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Nov 12, 2010 8:18am
se-alum;554680 wrote:What D1 team would hire this guy? He had the most talented team, possibly in NCAA history, and couldn't pull off a win against the Bucks. I love my Bucks, but they had no business beating that loaded Miami team.

I don't know whether he's that good or not, but damn man, nobody wins all the time. You can't judge a guy on one game - and that Buckeye team (no, I'm not a fan) wasn't exactly a slouch...saying they had "no business" beating Miami is a stretch.
0
0311sdp
Posts: 580
Nov 12, 2010 12:29pm
The new WAC in 2012 won't be much better than the Sunbelt or the Mid American
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 12, 2010 2:34pm
enigmaax;554740 wrote:I don't know whether he's that good or not, but damn man, nobody wins all the time. You can't judge a guy on one game - and that Buckeye team (no, I'm not a fan) wasn't exactly a slouch...saying they had "no business" beating Miami is a stretch.

Miami was favored by 14. That's 2 touchdowns.
gerb131's avatar
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Nov 12, 2010 3:48pm
sleeper;555097 wrote:Miami was favored by 14. That's 2 touchdowns.

And two extra points :)
j_crazy's avatar
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Nov 12, 2010 4:01pm
this is why non AQ schools have no beef. and also why i have a beef with the big east getting an AQ bid.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Nov 12, 2010 8:32pm
sleeper;555097 wrote:Miami was favored by 14. That's 2 touchdowns.

Big deal. Guys who predicted the score differential to get people to bet were wrong. Ohio State was undefeated. How many draft picks of their own came off that team? It was an upset, but it wasn't like a craphole team beat a juggernaut. One undefeated team beat another undefeated team - if you thought OSU had "no business" beating them, you apparently feel that they shouldn't have played at all.