V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 10, 2010 5:58pm
why thank you, Gibby--that's gracious of you to sayTy Webb;552872 wrote:Ohio State had better hope they get to play TCU or Auburn...they would kick their ass by 2 TD's
Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Nov 10, 2010 7:15pm
vball10set;552998 wrote:why thank you, Gibby--that's gracious of you to say
Do you have to act like a child?
What has Ohio State shown this year to make you fans think they can even contend with Oregon,Auburn,or TCU? Hell,even Boise and LSU
KR1245
Posts: 4,317
Nov 10, 2010 7:34pm
Ty Webb;553071 wrote:Do you have to act like a child?
What has Ohio State shown this year to make you fans think they can even contend with Oregon,Auburn,or TCU? Hell,even Boise and LSU
People were saying the same shit last year after we lost to Purdue. I think you were one of the many claiming that Oregon would roll over the Buckeyes. The Buckeyes have more football talent than teams like TCU, Boise, Oregon.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 10, 2010 7:37pm
do you really want to go there? think before you type--if that's even possible.Ty Webb;553071 wrote:Do you have to act like a child?
btw, why don't you show us those pics again of you down in Gainesville at the Gators practice--those were really cool
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Nov 10, 2010 8:55pm
BigAppleBuckeye;552853 wrote:No one ever talks about OSU's 3-2-1 all-time record against the SEC in the regular season ... we own them!
Iliketurtles, who is your team again? Or are you one of those pussies who just talks shit with no allegiance?
BAB Actually it was merely a joke I just don't really like sleeper. And no I have an allegiance my team is Florida State and yes you can go ahead and make fun of them
. Also where did I talk shit? I posted a fact. To be honest though I think OSU would have a better shot at any of those teams from the SEC then TCU.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 10, 2010 9:07pm
is this your opinion, or do you have an in with the Sugar Bowl committee too? nothing would surprise me in "Gibby World" :rolleyes:Ty Webb;552902 The Sugar Bowl also gets the first pick of all the at-large teams and will take an undefeated Boise State if Ohio State beats Iowa.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 10, 2010 9:13pm
is this your opinion, or are you on the Sugar Bowl committee as well? nothing would surprise me in your fictitious "Gibby World" :rolleyes:Ty Webb;552902 wrote: The Sugar Bowl also gets the first pick of all the at-large teams and will take an undefeated Boise State if Ohio State beats Iowa. If Iowa wins that game, look for Michigan State to land in the Rose and Wisconsin to land here, pushing Boise State out of the BCS.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 10, 2010 11:56pm
Ty Webb;553071 wrote:Do you have to act like a child?
What has Ohio State shown this year to make you fans think they can even contend with Oregon,Auburn,or TCU? Hell,even Boise and LSU
Hmm, well we beat Oregon last year, the entire SEC is garbage, and Boise and TCU would have at least 2-3 losses if they played in the real conference.
Prove me wrong.
LOL
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Nov 11, 2010 12:03am
ND was invited to that bowl last year and turned it down. Marshall was about their 5th choice to fill the B10 spot (and they still beat us 
)
)
0
0311sdp
Posts: 580
Nov 11, 2010 1:58pm
The only way Michigan State can possibly go to the Rose Bowl is if both Wisconsin and Ohio State lose, in which case Wisconsin would not be going to a BCS Bowl (nor would the Bucks) making the Scout.com projection highly unlikely.
A
Al Bundy
Posts: 4,180
Nov 11, 2010 2:11pm
0311sdp;553886 wrote:The only way Michigan State can possibly go to the Rose Bowl is if both Wisconsin and Ohio State lose, in which case Wisconsin would not be going to a BCS Bowl (nor would the Bucks) making the Scout.com projection highly unlikely.
MSU only needs OSU to lose.
If MSU and Wisc finish in two-way tie, MSU won head-to-head.
If MSU, Iowa, and Wisc finish in three-way tie. Head-to-head is even because they all went 1-1 against each other. Second tie-breaker is overall record, that eliminates Iowa, then MSU has head-to-head tiebreaker over Wisc.
D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Nov 11, 2010 3:23pm
Al Bundy;553893 wrote:MSU only needs OSU to lose.
If MSU and Wisc finish in two-way tie, MSU won head-to-head.
If MSU, Iowa, and Wisc finish in three-way tie. Head-to-head is even because they all went 1-1 against each other. Second tie-breaker is overall record, that eliminates Iowa, then MSU has head-to-head tiebreaker over Wisc.
I don't believe that is true. The highest ranked Big Ten team in the BCS gets the Rose Bowl bid, if I recall correctly.
0
0311sdp
Posts: 580
Nov 11, 2010 3:45pm
I thought the tiebreaker in a 3 way tie is that the team that is ranked highest in the BCS goes to the Rose Bowl, in a 2 way tie I believe your correct head to head decides but I don't see how there will not be a three way tie unless both Ohio State and Wisconsin lose. It will be either MSU, Wis. and OSU or MSU Wis, and Iowa. In either scenario MSU would not go to the Rose Bowl. (but I could be wrong) It could also be OSU and MSU in which case OSU goes as the two did not play and OSU again would have the higher ranking in the BCS. I just don't see MSU in the Rose Bowl unless some really big upsets happen.
Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Nov 11, 2010 5:23pm
KR1245;553092 wrote:People were saying the same shit last year after we lost to Purdue. I think you were one of the many claiming that Oregon would roll over the Buckeyes. The Buckeyes have more football talent than teams like TCU, Boise, Oregon.
Boise yes....TCU maybe...Oregon not even close
Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Nov 11, 2010 5:24pm
vball10set;553215 wrote:is this your opinion, or are you on the Sugar Bowl committee as well? nothing would surprise me in your fictitious "Gibby World" :rolleyes:
From the website I got the projections
A
Al Bundy
Posts: 4,180
Nov 11, 2010 5:58pm
0311sdp;554002 wrote:I thought the tiebreaker in a 3 way tie is that the team that is ranked highest in the BCS goes to the Rose Bowl, in a 2 way tie I believe your correct head to head decides but I don't see how there will not be a three way tie unless both Ohio State and Wisconsin lose. It will be either MSU, Wis. and OSU or MSU Wis, and Iowa. In either scenario MSU would not go to the Rose Bowl. (but I could be wrong) It could also be OSU and MSU in which case OSU goes as the two did not play and OSU again would have the higher ranking in the BCS. I just don't see MSU in the Rose Bowl unless some really big upsets happen.
http://www.bigten.org/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/102204aad.html
If the 3 way tie is between MSU, Iowa, and Wisc., Iowa is eliminated by 5d since they had an out of conference loss. Then MSU has head-to-head over Wisc.
If the 3 way tie is between MSU, OSU, and Wisc., it would go to 5e (BCS standings), because all 3 teams would have the same overall record.
believer
Posts: 8,153
Nov 12, 2010 4:22am
How soon we've forgotten last year's Rose Bowl. The Bucks owned the Ducks.Ty Webb;554093 wrote:Boise yes....TCU maybe...Oregon not even close
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Nov 12, 2010 7:21am
Why are you saying he's a pussy or asking about his allegiance simply because he mentioned how terrible OSU is in bowls against the SEC.BigAppleBuckeye;552853 wrote:No one ever talks about OSU's 3-2-1 all-time record against the SEC in the regular season ... we own them!
Iliketurtles, who is your team again? Or are you one of those pussies who just talks shit with no allegiance?
It's not like he's making anything up....
Take a chill pill
BigAppleBuckeye
Posts: 2,935
Nov 12, 2010 11:47am
Pipe down lhslep, he doesn't need a bodyguard. Besides, there is an inside joke involved here discussed over PM. Perhaps my "lhslep134;554708 wrote:Why are you saying he's a pussy or asking about his allegiance simply because he mentioned how terrible OSU is in bowls against the SEC.
It's not like he's making anything up....
Take a chill pill
" didn't indicate my sarcasm enough? (ready, here it comes ...)
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 12, 2010 1:23pm
fixedBigAppleBuckeye;554908 wrote:Pipe down lhslep, he doesn't need a bodyguard. Besides, there is an inside joke involved here discussed over PM. Perhaps my "
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Nov 12, 2010 1:46pm
I'd love for OSU to play an SEC school! Preferably Bama or LSU.
Why do you guys even reply to Ty?
Why do you guys even reply to Ty?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Nov 12, 2010 1:48pm
I reply to him because he is very easy to discuss sports and other topics in a very rational way with. That and its great entertainment to see how easily he gets riled up.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 12, 2010 2:37pm
Automatik;555036 wrote:I'd love for OSU to play an SEC school! Preferably Bama or LSU.
Why do you guys even reply to Ty?
Because he has downs syndrome and if we didn't I'd fear he'd off himself.
Ty Webb
Posts: 2,798
Nov 12, 2010 3:30pm
sleeper;555100 wrote:Because he has downs syndrome and if we didn't I'd fear he'd off himself.
No sleeper....that would be you my friend
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 12, 2010 4:19pm
Have you ever looked in the mirror? Get help man.