F
FairwoodKing
Posts: 2,504
Nov 18, 2010 6:26pm
You're an idiot. Most of the students who were shot were simply going to class. I had a mid-term schedule that day. One of the students who was shot was in my class. If I had been with him at that exact moment, I might have been shot, too.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Nov 18, 2010 9:52pm
FairwoodKing;564717 wrote:You're an idiot. Most of the students who were shot were simply going to class. I had a mid-term schedule that day. One of the students who was shot was in my class. If I had been with him at that exact moment, I might have been shot, too.
So, what you are saying is that a few protesting students spoiled it for some innocent students? Because, if the protesting students had vacated the premises like they were ordered, no KSU students would have been killed on 5/4/1970; protesting ones or passersby.
Is that correct or not?
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Nov 18, 2010 9:54pm
FairwoodKing;564717 wrote:You're an idiot. Most of the students who were shot were simply going to class. I had a mid-term schedule that day. One of the students who was shot was in my class. If I had been with him at that exact moment, I might have been shot, too.
Btw, was the student in your class who was shot skipping class to participate in the demonstration?
F
FairwoodKing
Posts: 2,504
Nov 18, 2010 11:25pm
He was observing but not participating.
What difference does it make? The protesters were right. If I knew then what I know now, I would have been in the front line protesting. The ones who should have been killed were Nixon and Rhodes.
What difference does it make? The protesters were right. If I knew then what I know now, I would have been in the front line protesting. The ones who should have been killed were Nixon and Rhodes.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Nov 18, 2010 11:37pm
FairwoodKing;565071 wrote:He was observing but not participating.
What difference does it make? The protesters were right. If I knew then what I know now, I would have been in the front line protesting. The ones who should have been killed were Nixon and Rhodes.
No one should have been killed one way or the other Nixon/Rhodes included. I know you agree with that too.
I worked with a guy who was a guardsmen on that day, not subject matter he cared to discuss other than it changed him for the rest of his life. There were no winners on that day. Though blaming one or the other might make one feel better, whose to blame is of little consequence when all things are considered.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Nov 19, 2010 7:31am
FairwoodKing;565071 wrote:He was observing but not participating.
What difference does it make? The protesters were right. If I knew then what I know now, I would have been in the front line protesting. The ones who should have been killed were Nixon and Rhodes.
It makes all the difference. They were breaking the law. They were not "right" as you put it. Breaking the law is not "right" is the United States or any other country in the world. Oh, you mean I ideally they were right? Well, when expressing your ideals breaks the law, you pay the price. In some countries, the result would have been much worse; much sooner.
Bottom line is: no violent protest of the government, no deaths by Taylor Hall on May 4th.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Nov 19, 2010 7:36am
Also, FYI:
No personal attacks or unwarranted name-calling. Just because someone has a different opinion doesn't mean they're an idiot.
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/misc.php?do=vsarules
No personal attacks or unwarranted name-calling. Just because someone has a different opinion doesn't mean they're an idiot.
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/misc.php?do=vsarules
FairwoodKing;564717 wrote:You're an idiot. Most of the students who were shot were simply going to class. I had a mid-term schedule that day. One of the students who was shot was in my class. If I had been with him at that exact moment, I might have been shot, too.
F
FairwoodKing
Posts: 2,504
Nov 19, 2010 2:17pm
If people in a free country can't protest, then who can? This isn't communist China. The students who were protesting were on their own campus where they belonged. Nixon was responsible for this disaster when he expanded an already unpopular war.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Nov 19, 2010 8:27pm
FairwoodKing;565752 wrote:If people in a free country can't protest, then who can? This isn't communist China. The students who were protesting were on their own campus where they belonged. Nixon was responsible for this disaster when he expanded an already unpopular war.
Does protesting include burning government buildings "on their own campus" just a day or two prior? I mean, where did these students expect it was leading?
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Nov 19, 2010 8:43pm
FairwoodKing;565752 wrote:If people in a free country can't protest, then who can? This isn't communist China. The students who were protesting were on their own campus where they belonged. Nixon was responsible for this disaster when he expanded an already unpopular war.
There many places in the US that you must gain a permit and permission to assemble at. You can't simply gather at your will and protest anywhere in the US and we are not communist. Don't suggest that freedom implies unlimited protest rights. It doesn't .
It wasn't simply "their" campus. It was all of our campus. There's a difference.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Nov 19, 2010 10:54pm
You tell him, CA. 
F
FairwoodKing
Posts: 2,504
Nov 20, 2010 5:14pm
When the U.S. government gets its citizens into an unjust war, then it is time to protest. I'm glad they burnt down the ROTC building. Nixon's war machine shouldn't have been on our campus.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Nov 21, 2010 2:53pm
Let's remember that FairwoodKing, a few posts ago, also called for the killing of the President of the United States and the Ohio Governor.
Maybe it's time the FBI puts him on their watch list.
Maybe it's time the FBI puts him on their watch list.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Nov 21, 2010 3:26pm
FairwoodKing;567590 wrote:When the U.S. government gets its citizens into an unjust war, then it is time to protest. I'm glad they burnt down the ROTC building. Nixon's war machine shouldn't have been on our campus.
you sound like a hippie. It doesn't matter if you think the war was unjust or not, but shit, at least support people that are dying for our country and your freedom!!
F
FairwoodKing
Posts: 2,504
Nov 21, 2010 5:46pm
No, I wasn't a hippie. In fact, I was in ROTC for two years until the draft lottery got me out of Vietnam.
Nobody was dying for my freedom in Vietnam. It was a war the politicians cooked up for their own benefit. More than 58,000 American soldiers died for nothing.
Nobody was dying for my freedom in Vietnam. It was a war the politicians cooked up for their own benefit. More than 58,000 American soldiers died for nothing.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 21, 2010 5:54pm
why don't you take this to the political forum, fellas, or at the very least to the serious business forum...it really doesn't belong on the CFB site
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Nov 21, 2010 10:59pm
vball10set;569838 wrote:why don't you take this to the political forum, fellas, or at the very least to the serious business forum...it really doesn't belong on the CFB site
What was the Kent score this weekend? There...you happy?
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 22, 2010 2:58pm
they lost 38-3 to Western Michigan, and yes--thank you :rolleyes:
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Nov 22, 2010 4:05pm
FairwoodKing;569829 wrote:No, I wasn't a hippie. In fact, I was in ROTC for two years until the draft lottery got me out of Vietnam.
Nobody was dying for my freedom in Vietnam. It was a war the politicians cooked up for their own benefit. More than 58,000 American soldiers died for nothing.
I would like to purchase for you, free of charge, a one-way plane ticket to the destination of your choice. Once there, you can post about how great your new country how wonderful the government is.
The only condition is you have to promise to never come back.
B
bo shemmy3337
Posts: 962
Nov 23, 2010 4:49pm
FairwoodKing;563063 wrote:If you think losing a football game is the same as having 13 students shot, then you're sick!
Or I am a senior at Kent State and I really tired of everyone talking about this all the time. And they do trust me.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Nov 23, 2010 5:24pm
I thought it was Natl Guard - 4 Kent St - 0 (I know I know sick old joke)vball10set;571116 wrote:they lost 38-3 to Western Michigan, and yes--thank you :rolleyes:
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 23, 2010 6:47pm
dynamite drop in, schemmy...stick to the tsun boards, k?bo shemmy3337;572888 wrote:Or I am a senior at Kent State and I really tired of everyone talking about this all the time. And they do trust me.
F
FairwoodKing
Posts: 2,504
Nov 25, 2010 5:25pm
Steel Valley Football;571217 wrote:I would like to purchase for you, free of charge, a one-way plane ticket to the destination of your choice. Once there, you can post about how great your new country how wonderful the government is.
The only condition is you have to promise to never come back.
If Sarah Palin ever becomes president, I will take you up on that.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 25, 2010 5:33pm
FairwoodKing;575217 wrote:If Sarah Palin ever becomes president, I will take you up on that.
why wait? If our country is as bad as you say it is, get the fuck out
UA5straightin2008
Posts: 3,246
Nov 25, 2010 8:22pm
cant read
cant write
kent state
cant write
kent state