thePITman
Posts: 3,867
Nov 11, 2010 8:50pm
^^ I wonder if they "got swag", too...
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Nov 11, 2010 8:56pm
BRF back in your days as a student at OHS did you use the phrase "21 skee do" Instead of "Swag"?
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Nov 11, 2010 8:59pm
d3r3k;554305 wrote:I will be checking out this game in person. The last two Orrville games I attended were against Cardinal Mooney and Ottawa-Glandorf so I'm hoping I'm not bad luck for the Red Riders. Hopefully I'll get to see an Orrville victory this time around.
Welcome to our thread, n00b! And I hope you are right!
Series62, oh my, what can I say? You are busy with your jousts with RR1. You and I will hook up later.
Isn't it funny how RR1, the ambassador of good will, always tells people to calm down and knock it off? But ONE GUY, pulls his trigger and then..... Anyhow, I am on your side, RR1. You go. Should I do the "thang" that I'm always accused of doing? As in, "if you don't like it, get the hell off of our threads"? Naww! Everybody: use your freedom of speech.
God Bless America and Go Riders! ............wait......Go Riders is probably finalizing his bet with Jerry. I mean....."Go Red Riders"!
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Nov 11, 2010 9:01pm
THE4RINGZ;554341 wrote:BRF back in your days as a student at OHS did you use the phrase "21 skee do" Instead of "Swag"?
No! Because that would be "gay".......................shhhhhhhhh............you're not supposed to say that in this day and age!
you think you know
Posts: 272
Nov 11, 2010 9:01pm
Their only upstanding when the Viagra kicks in! (Bah! Ha!)Series62;554324 wrote:What is there to back up? You insinuated some bull***t activity with your "friends of the program" comment, so I gave you some bull***t to go along with it!
We all know that all involved in Orrville sports are as straight-laced as they come...you never fail to mention how upstanding you are.
S
Series62
Posts: 812
Nov 11, 2010 9:04pm
I missed this comment earlier; Matt and Mason get a lot more "touches" than Turner and he is effective in short yardage situations, so, NO! I'm under the assumption that Tre is the starting and best RB in Orrville, hasn't he achieved over 1,000 yards this year? I would key in more on Drew and find a way to get the ball more often to Stew as he seems to have more speed against these tougher teams. Perhaps they should play Max at TE more, he's not doing much at DE, despite what some of you tend to think.RedRider1;553661 wrote:Do you take issue with kids like Matt Davis and Mason not getting more "touches?" Or just Turner?
Just trying to understand if your problem is with the entire offensive playcalling, or are you just singling out one kid? Remember...you have Tre, Mason, Stew, Drew and Max. I'd call all of them playmakers....and their performance this year backs it up. Each has made big plays for this team this season.
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Nov 11, 2010 9:06pm
Oh, schnipps, I am going to be in so much trouble now!
WTF................Go Riders!
Bring some BIG SWAG (without quotes) tomorrow night.
I guarantee you, there will be some Big Hits put on from our guys, and maybe even a little added "that's from BRF, too"!
WTF................Go Riders!
Bring some BIG SWAG (without quotes) tomorrow night.
I guarantee you, there will be some Big Hits put on from our guys, and maybe even a little added "that's from BRF, too"!
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Nov 11, 2010 9:08pm
Wow...........my ribs are cracking..........please stop.you think you know;554349 wrote:Their only upstanding when the Viagra kicks in! (Bah! Ha!)
p.s. - it's "they're"
edit: and that's a really subtle way to say...............get the hell off our thread! BAH ha ha!
5knots
Posts: 1,474
Nov 11, 2010 9:09pm
OK Series.....you care way too much about football to waste you time in those blue and gold rags! Just give the Mrs an ultimatum and get your family on over here. Enough already!
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Nov 11, 2010 9:10pm
Your answer explains why I thought you would have used that phrase.BRF;554348 wrote:No! Because that would be "gay".......................shhhhhhhhh............you're not supposed to say that
in this day and age!
S
Series62
Posts: 812
Nov 11, 2010 9:11pm
What are we going to "hook up" about? And have you ever noticed how that "get off our threads" junk never seems to work? You guys are a tad too full of yourselves!BRF;554345 wrote:.....Should I do the "thang" that I'm always accused of doing? As in, "if you don't like it, get the hell off of our threads"? Naww! Everybody: use your freedom of speech.......
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Nov 11, 2010 9:15pm
THE4RINGZ;554360 wrote:Your answer explains why I thought you would have used that phrase.
Bah! Troll!
But I still like ya, cause you are rooting for the Riders, right? I would hate to have to come over there and kick your...........I mean get Old Rider to come over and kick your...............oh............never mind!
Ha ha ha! You go, boy and keep that Swag!
S
Series62
Posts: 812
Nov 11, 2010 9:15pm
Do you mean "here" as in Orrville, 5knutz? I'm here baby, I can see your house from mine! By the way, what's all the excavation for down the road from you?5knots;554358 wrote:OK Series.....you care way too much about football to waste you time in those blue and gold rags! Just give the Mrs an ultimatum and get your family on over here. Enough already!
5knots
Posts: 1,474
Nov 11, 2010 9:17pm
Oh dang...i mixed you up with another guy "shawtie" (spelling BRF?) I'm thinking Dr. Markley must have lost something?
thePITman
Posts: 3,867
Nov 11, 2010 9:18pm
I'm starting to think the word "bah" is the most commonly used word in this thread, now. Haha!
you think you know
Posts: 272
Nov 11, 2010 9:18pm
BRF;554356 wrote:Wow...........my ribs are cracking..........please stop.
p.s. - it's "they're"
edit: and that's a really subtle way to say...............get the hell off our thread! BAH ha ha!
I don't know it worked on me I going to leave and I don't think I'll ever be able to come back and have my grammer correctedddd again by BFR.Series62;554361 wrote:What are we going to "hook up" about? And have you ever noticed how that "get off our threads" junk never seems to work? You guys are a tad too full of yourselves!
edit: Their grammer errors were just for you
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Nov 11, 2010 9:18pm
You know what I mean.Series62;554361 wrote:What are we going to "hook up" about? And have you ever noticed how that "get off our threads" junk never seems to work? You guys are a tad too full of yourselves!
And the "get off our threads" is now a joke I like to use. So get with the times.
Speaking of full of oneself, look in the mirror.
And, yeah, I'll tell it to your face.
S
Series62
Posts: 812
Nov 11, 2010 9:20pm
thePITman;554330 wrote:^^ I wonder if they "got swag", too...
Yes they do! See how their pants "hang" off their buts like drapery! LOLOLOL!
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Nov 11, 2010 9:20pm
One down.you think you know;554382 wrote:I don't know it worked on me I going to leave and I don't think I'll ever be able to come back and have my spelling correctedddd again by BFR.
you think you know
Posts: 272
Nov 11, 2010 9:22pm
Did it wear off already?BRF;554389 wrote:One down.
5knots
Posts: 1,474
Nov 11, 2010 9:23pm
He'll be back....he's like the TERMINATER!
BRF
Posts: 8,748
Nov 11, 2010 9:24pm
Hey! You said you weren't coming back, Pinocchio!you think you know;554393 wrote:Did it wear off already?
S
Series62
Posts: 812
Nov 11, 2010 9:25pm
No, I don't know what you mean! Please explain on here, in a PM, and tomorrow in my face.BRF;554385 wrote:You know what I mean.
And the "get off our threads" is now a joke I like to use. So get with the times.
Speaking of full of oneself, look in the mirror.
And, yeah, I'll tell it to your face.
Oh yeah, and "telling it to my face", is that supposed to be another demonstration of your "swag", "swagger", "attitude"? What?
you think you know
Posts: 272
Nov 11, 2010 9:27pm
I just hope Orrville jams the receivers at the line and gives your defense time to do what it likes to do!
S
Series62
Posts: 812
Nov 11, 2010 9:28pm
He's like those dogs that bark like their tough behind the fence, stare at him, he'll whimper! LOLOLOLOL!you think you know;554393 wrote:Did it wear off already?