I Wear Pants;542870 wrote:Coons is not a communist.
I'm not sure what other descriptor would be closer ....
I Wear Pants;542870 wrote:Coons is not a communist.
HitsRus;542866 wrote:...and Strickland even having a shot tonite makes me question the intelligence and sanity of Ohioans. I mean, what do you have to do (or not do) to get thrown out on your ass? Wasn't do- nothing Taft bad enough? What has this governor done to deserve 4 more years? Insanity is sometimes defined as doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. It appears half the state should be put away in an asylum.
QuakerOats;542836 wrote:Marco Rubio bringing tears to the eye with his victory speech ---- wow, what a human being >> what a potential national leader!!
I noticed you haven't answered this Quaker.I Wear Pants;542873 wrote:How is he a communist?
HitsRus;542866 wrote:...and Strickland even having a shot tonite makes me question the intelligence and sanity of Ohioans. I mean, what do you have to do (or not do) to get thrown out on your ass? Wasn't do- nothing Taft bad enough? What has this governor done to deserve 4 more years? Insanity is sometimes defined as doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. It appears half the state should be put away in an asylum.
QFTchicago510;542899 wrote:Thank god that I will never say the words Speaker Pelosi again.
So what happens if California gets in trouble under your leadership? We let them sink? Because I don't believe that'd be very helpful.BGFalcons82;542896 wrote:Kasich is up 49-46 now. You want to talk insanity? Look at California who will elect Jerry Brown, who is beholden to any and all unions....which are directly responsible for their $500 BILLIION deficit. They may indeed slide into the Pacific within the next year or two. Obama won't be able to bail them out now.
I Wear Pants;542906 wrote:So what happens if California gets in trouble under your leadership? We let them sink? Because I don't believe that'd be very helpful.
I Wear Pants;542906 wrote:So what happens if California gets in trouble under your leadership? We let them sink? Because I don't believe that'd be very helpful.
I Wear Pants;542906 wrote:So what happens if California gets in trouble under your leadership? We let them sink? Because I don't believe that'd be very helpful.
I'm not a fan of most unions. Anymore they stand to stiffle business.BGFalcons82;542916 wrote:Cali is failing BECAUSE of unions. overspending, and other Democratic spending spending spending. Subsidizing failure = more failure. Just like GM...they have to learn what is failing in order to fix it. Keeping their hand on the red-hot stove burner when they should be pulling back is sure to burn their hand beyond all recognition.
The point is they are insane to believe more of the same will fix them from the ones that got them into their mess. They are expecting different results with the same players. DOH!!
ou1980;542919 wrote:Not so fast........
5905/9910
R John Kasich 49% 1,183,736
D Ted Strickland* 47% 1,116,545
Third time is a charm?I Wear Pants;542873 wrote:How is he a communist?
ccrunner609;542926 wrote:MSNBC just call Michelle Bachman a moron and they are making fun of her.
What a great news source.