Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Oct 26, 2010 1:46pm
under
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Oct 26, 2010 1:48pm
like_that;533409 wrote:Under. Outside the big 3 they really suck ass. I can't see those 3 bringing it for that many games during the regular season. Someone is going to get hurt, and they might have the #1 seed locked up early, so they will start resting at the end of the year.
Mike Miller - Averaged 11 ppg and 4 apg while shooting 48% from 3 last year
Z - played significant minutes on the best team in the regular season last year
Haslem - was the starting PF on a championship team and is a great role player
House - key player off the bench for the NBA runner ups last year
Add in Anthony, Arroyo, Chalmers, Jones and Magloire and the others are not really that bad.
Not great by any means, but definitely serviceable.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Oct 26, 2010 1:50pm
z played significantly? Mike Miller is out for a while.Haslem was a role player surrounded by all stars. House was traded to the Knicks mid season. Do you even watch the games?
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Oct 26, 2010 1:59pm
Pick6;533432 wrote:z played significantly? Mike Miller is out for a while.Haslem was a role player surrounded by all stars. House was traded to the Knicks mid season. Do you even watch the games?
I should have clarified the Z comment. He played meaninful minutes, in significance. I know he didn't play a majority of minutes.
Mike Miller will be back.
You proved my point about Haslem.
I got House confused with Robinson. House was a spark the previous year though.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Oct 26, 2010 1:59pm
thedynasty1998;533416 wrote:This is such a stupid hypothetical. So, how about the Lakers without Gasol. Thunder without Westbrook.
You can't talk about a team without one of them best players. Why would anyone assume someone is going to get hurt?
Because Dwade always seems to be hurt.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Oct 26, 2010 2:01pm
thedynasty1998;533416 wrote:This is such a stupid hypothetical. So, how about the Lakers without Gasol. Thunder without Westbrook.
You can't talk about a team without one of them best players. Why would anyone assume someone is going to get hurt?
ummm, because it was said are you basing this off of if they wont gel or injuries???
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Oct 26, 2010 2:11pm
Laley23;533450 wrote:ummm, because it was said are you basing this off of if they wont gel or injuries???
what?
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Oct 26, 2010 2:16pm
thedynasty1998;533477 wrote:what?
posts 5-9
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Oct 26, 2010 2:17pm
This thread sucks....33 posts and not one mention of Ben Watson. I should lock it up.
B
Blanket
Posts: 369
Oct 26, 2010 2:20pm
Under
66
66
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 26, 2010 2:22pm
thedynasty1998;533424 wrote:Mike Miller - Averaged 11 ppg and 4 apg while shooting 48% from 3 last year
Z - played significant minutes on the best team in the regular season last year
Haslem - was the starting PF on a championship team and is a great role player
House - key player off the bench for the NBA runner ups last year
Add in Anthony, Arroyo, Chalmers, Jones and Magloire and the others are not really that bad.
Not great by any means, but definitely serviceable.
I see. So now that Z doesn't play for the Cavs he is a serviceable player? Makes plenty of sense when you think in terms of your logic.
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Oct 26, 2010 2:31pm
like_that;533497 wrote:I see. So now that Z doesn't play for the Cavs he is a serviceable player? Makes plenty of sense when you think in terms of your logic.
He's not good by any means, but he's exactly what this team needs. A guy who can stand on the baseline and knock down shots. The Big 3 will command so much attention a guy like Z becomes that much more valuable because he keeps a defender occupied.
Now the defensive end is a different story.
W
wghfan
Posts: 744
Oct 26, 2010 4:22pm
The Heat are overated.
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Oct 26, 2010 7:12pm
wghfan;533689 wrote:The Heat are overated.
We'll see soon enough.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Oct 26, 2010 7:19pm
I don't believe they are overrated. I don't see them being a record setting team but they should be pretty good.
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Oct 26, 2010 7:26pm
like_that;533409 wrote:Under. Outside the big 3 they really suck ass. I can't see those 3 bringing it for that many games during the regular season.
Not hardly. The only weak spot is the C position. Every where else they are built with some nice role players who "get it".
If one of them get hurt, they'll still be fine. Let's not forget Lebron won 61 games last year with a very modest starting cast. Mo Williams, Anthony Parker, and Anderson Varejao OR D-wade/Bosh, Mike Miller, and Udonis Haslem? At the very least they will win 5 more games than Cleveland did last year. At the very least
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 26, 2010 7:53pm
jordo212000;533940 wrote:Not hardly. The only weak spot is the C position. Every where else they are built with some nice role players who "get it".
Its funny how the same people saying this type of shit are the same people who said the cavs role players were garbage.
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Oct 26, 2010 8:09pm
68 in the regular season?
I'd say under 67
I'd say under 67