lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Oct 4, 2010 3:23pm
Commander of Awesome;507026 wrote:You haven't added anything other than statements that were wrong, and assumptions there were also wrong. Sorry but your trollish tactics aren't going to go unnoticed.
He didn't say anything that was false though.
The Browns QB situation hasn't been anything short of pathetic since 1999.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 4, 2010 3:28pm
This year its been solid. Wallace has played about as well as you can ask, rating over 100 against the Ravens, over 80 for the season. Thats fairly solid IMO, not pathetic. Outside of 2007, though youre right, the browns QB play has been terrible. But he was saying this season, which isn't true.
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Oct 4, 2010 3:55pm
Week 1: Delhomme: 20/37 227 yards 1TD 2 INT 59.2 Rating
Week 2: Wallace: 16/31 229 yards 1TD 1 INT 73.2 Rating
Week 3: Wallace: 18/24 141 yards 1TD 0 INT 103.0 Rating
Week 4: Wallace: 18/30 184 yards 1TD 1 INT 74.9 Rating
The Browns have had 1 good week of quarterback play and you're falling back on that to say that they have had solid QB play this season??
Week 2: Wallace: 16/31 229 yards 1TD 1 INT 73.2 Rating
Week 3: Wallace: 18/24 141 yards 1TD 0 INT 103.0 Rating
Week 4: Wallace: 18/30 184 yards 1TD 1 INT 74.9 Rating
The Browns have had 1 good week of quarterback play and you're falling back on that to say that they have had solid QB play this season??
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 4, 2010 4:06pm
Delhomme was injured near the end of the first half, before that he was playing well. Wallace has played solid as well, so yeah I am. Our WRs on the other hand have been nothing short of terrible.
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Oct 4, 2010 4:15pm
Compared to last year's QB play, this year is at a Pro Bowl level. lol
Shabaka Bashaarat
Posts: 43
Oct 4, 2010 4:36pm
Commander of Awesome;507089 wrote:Delhomme was injured near the end of the first half, before that he was playing well. Wallace has played solid as well, so yeah I am. Our WRs on the other hand have been nothing short of terrible.
Way to be on cloud 9 after a 1-3 start. Next thing we know, you will be saying wallace and delhomme deserve to be traded for 1st round picks. Let us know when you return from your vacation at delusional island.
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
Oct 4, 2010 5:04pm
i wonder if they wish they'd not have run leinart out of town?
i'm being serious. are they okay with hall being their guy? or do they regret how they handled things with leinart?
i'm being serious. are they okay with hall being their guy? or do they regret how they handled things with leinart?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 4, 2010 6:38pm
Shabaka Bashaarat;507139 wrote:Way to be on cloud 9 after a 1-3 start. Next thing we know, you will be saying wallace and delhomme deserve to be traded for 1st round picks. Let us know when you return from your vacation at delusional island.
Idiot post of the week congrats. You're right I think we can trade some average QBs for 1st round picks. I said that QB play was decent, not pathetic and all of a sudden I am dellusional into thinking thinking we have 2 pro bowlers at the position. Any other ASSumptions you want to make?
Shabaka Bashaarat
Posts: 43
Oct 4, 2010 6:49pm
Commander of Idiot;507237 wrote:Idiot post of the week congrats. You're right I think we can trade some average QBs for 1st round picks. I said that QB play was decent, not pathetic and all of a sudden I am dellusional into thinking thinking we have 2 pro bowlers at the position. Any other ASSumptions you want to make?
Idiot post of the week? I think you already made that post idiot!! I am sure you are high on OC's idiot rankings. It was called sarcasm dipshit. I was poking fun at you for actually thinking the QB play was even decent. Sorry I am not holding hands around your camp fire singing koombaya over 4 weeks of mediocre QB stats. I am sure if you were the Browns coach you would distribute apple stickers for performance.
You might as well change your name commander of idiot (already did it for u in the quote feature). Also, nice avatar. The fact your try to act like some bully is laughable. You are probably some idiot nerd yourself who only plays video games and gets fat.
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Oct 4, 2010 7:22pm
Using his most used term, I think you just pwned him.Shabaka Bashaarat;507249 wrote:Idiot post of the week? I think you already made that post idiot!! I am sure you are high on OC's idiot rankings. It was called sarcasm dipshit. I was poking fun at you for actually thinking the QB play was even decent. Sorry I am not holding hands around your camp fire singing koombaya over 4 weeks of mediocre QB stats. I am sure if you were the Browns coach you would distribute apple stickers for performance.
You might as well change your name commander of idiot (already did it for u in the quote feature). Also, nice avatar. The fact your try to act like some bully is laughable. You are probably some idiot nerd yourself who only plays video games and gets fat.
And the most idiotic statement of the week was his, saying the Browns have "average" QB's.
Y-Town Steelhound
Posts: 1,388
Oct 4, 2010 7:25pm
Shabaka Bashaarat;507249 wrote:Idiot post of the week? I think you already made that post idiot!! I am sure you are high on OC's idiot rankings. It was called sarcasm dipshit. I was poking fun at you for actually thinking the QB play was even decent. Sorry I am not holding hands around your camp fire singing koombaya over 4 weeks of mediocre QB stats. I am sure if you were the Browns coach you would distribute apple stickers for performance.
You might as well change your name commander of idiot (already did it for u in the quote feature). Also, nice avatar. The fact your try to act like some bully is laughable. You are probably some idiot nerd yourself who only plays video games and gets fat.
I believe you just called the stats mediocre. Isn't that what he was saying? That the quarterbacks are mediocre but they're not pathetic? You just defeated your own argument....congrats
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 4, 2010 7:34pm
Y-Town Steelhound;507292 wrote:I believe you just called the stats mediocre. Isn't that what he was saying? That the quarterbacks are mediocre but they're not pathetic? You just defeated your own argument....congrats
+ 1, they obviously just dont get it.
Shabaka Bashaarat
Posts: 43
Oct 4, 2010 7:36pm
There is a difference between solid and mediocre. I guess Y-Town can join kombaya by the fire. Also Dynasty, you were proven to be an idiot in another thread I saw. I don't need an idiot backing me up. Thanks.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 4, 2010 7:39pm
No one's singing by a fire. I certainly dont think Wallace is the answer at QB, but he has played decent, and should be stated as such. Pathetic is DA, or the Browns QB situation last yr. Mediocre/average is what Wallace has performed thus far.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Oct 4, 2010 8:02pm
Commander of Awesome;507314 wrote:No one's singing by a fire. I certainly dont think Wallace is the answer at QB, but he has played decent, and should be stated as such. Pathetic is DA, or the Browns QB situation last yr. Mediocre/average is what Wallace has performed thus far.
One QB has his team in First Place in their Division and the other has his in last place.
One QB has a Pro Bowl appearence and the other doesn't.
D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Oct 4, 2010 8:18pm
Skyhook79;507339 wrote:One QB has his team in First Place in their Division and the other has his in last place.
One QB has a Pro Bowl appearence and the other doesn't.
LOL, you can't be serious.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Oct 4, 2010 8:20pm
dat dude;507369 wrote:LOL, you can't be serious.
Serious about Facts?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Oct 4, 2010 8:24pm
Happy to make you laugh. Yes indeed....DA is a pig.jordo212000;506855 wrote:Derek the Pig? haha, you serious Clark?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Oct 4, 2010 8:27pm
One was benched in favor of a rookie, and the other was.....benched in favor of a rookie. Nice fail.Skyhook79;507339 wrote:One QB has his team in First Place in their Division and the other has his in last place.
One QB has a Pro Bowl appearence and the other doesn't.
LOL at DA making the pro bowl as the 3rd alternative.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Oct 4, 2010 8:34pm
Skyhook79;507339 wrote:One QB has his team in First Place in their Division and the other has his in last place.
One QB has a Pro Bowl appearence and the other doesn't.
WOW. I have seen some idiotic posts on this forum, but this one has to make the list for most idiotic.
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Oct 4, 2010 8:34pm
Commander of Awesome and Shabaka Baasharat,
Both of you need to stop the unnecessary name calling now, consider this your warning before infractions. Back and forth is nice, when every post involves name calling, it needs to be toned down.
Both of you need to stop the unnecessary name calling now, consider this your warning before infractions. Back and forth is nice, when every post involves name calling, it needs to be toned down.