krambman;492947 wrote:Honestly, why can't you do a new one each week. The first post can have a list of that week's games, the second post can be the standings. No need to have three separate threads for one thing stuck to the top. Whenever I log into this forum that only thing that comes up are the sticky threads. I can't even see a single normal topic because the page banner takes up half the screen and these stickies take up the other half. And do do these Pick'em threads even need to be stickied? I understand having a thread on the OSU, Michigan, and ND games stuck to the top so that we don't have 14 threads going for each game, but I think at this point those participating know that a new thread is posted every week and could locate it in the list of topics just fine. Just a suggestion so that the top of the page isn't so cluttered.

redfalcon;492954 wrote:Week 2 needs unstuck

Week 3 also needs unstuck, but we do need the current standings still

Week 4 needs to remain stuck, IMO.

krambman;492956 wrote:What I'm saying is why can't the standings be put at the top of the new thread each week. Why do they need separate threads?

Honestly I don't understand why any of it needs stickied at this point. We're entering the fourth week of the season. Those who are participating know it's going on, they know Enforcer starts the threads, and they can find it easily enough each week to make their picks.

Leonardo;492974 wrote:I think the mods are sleeping, haha. There should just be two threads... week X (4) games and standings after week Y (3).

Fab1b;493144 wrote:One mod here is in mexico and really hasn't gotten on the computer much. Is it really a problem what is sticky and what isn't? Just click on the threads you want to read/post and be done!

krambman;493145 wrote:Again, I repeat, why do we need two separate threads for that? Why not just one: Week X (4) Games and Standings After Week Y (3)?

Leonardo;492974 wrote: There should just be two threads... week X (4) games and standings after week Y (3).

Tiernan;493568 wrote:where are the results from week 3? Pretty sure I sucked the most cock.

Tiernan;493574 wrote:Pretty juvenile even for you Lotz.

Tiernan;493574 wrote:How come we haven't seen your vast CFB knowledge displayed in the Pick'Em? Probably for the exact same reason we haven't seen Web-liar and that is becuz you are both pooooosieees.

FatHobbit;493581 wrote:I wouldn't go pointing fingers there, if I were you.



Karen Lotz - 7,626 vcash
Tiernan - 1,735 vcash

D'oh

lhslep134;493584 wrote:I feel you, but I still wouldn't use vcash as a measure, because I could bet all my vcash on one event just because I can and it doesn't matter if I lose.

Tiernan;493621 wrote:Betting with v-cash is as lame as playing online poker without putting any real money up. From my understanding Lotz is one of the inventors of v-cash so naturally he plays the stupid thing. All I'm saying is that the weekly pick 'em gives some credibility as to your knowledge of CFB over a wider spectrum than just OSU, ND or scUM week to week. And to date Lotz, WebLiar and a few other regular know it alls have been reluctant to back up their BS in public, because they are afraid of being discovered as the posers they are.