Well I kind of feel like I'm home again.

BRF;487886 wrote:I can't believe that you weren't banned in that time. Frick'n 10 years? Good job, son! Weren't you once ccrunner"69"?

He was banned plenty of times. Luckily he also had about a half-dozen different accounts.

Since 2001 now a justin follower, do not post much but enjoy reading and trying to reach arcade levels.

rydawg5;487626 wrote:I alwasy thought you were kind of a troll.. but its cool

justincredible;487641 wrote:I don't think you know the definition of a troll. A dick, sure. A troll, no.

I could understand how I come off as a dick sometimes. I like to poke and prod and start arguments for arguments sake every once in a while. But I don't ride topics hard core ad nauseam like a sleeper, modell/capone, tiernan. I come in, get in my thoughts and generally take off after a couple of comments. And I definitely don't try to be a jack ass about it.

rydawg5;487642 wrote:I saw a picture of him once.. i thought he looked like a troll.. he actually seems like nice guy.. he can be ".edu" guy though

As far as ".edu" I'm assuming you say that because every once in a while I bring up where I went to school? I only do that in context now that I'm actually no longer in undergrad. Everyone brings up their own college while in college. It's a huge part of their life. But I only now bring it up if it's relevant. I believe the last and only recent example of this would be on that "Public Ivy's" thread. I did that because I had insight into the situation that not many others have. I doubt you could ever find me saying I'm right because I went to such and such school as my "proof of intelligence".

And nice little jab at my appearance. Nice try.

I was just kidding about you looking like a troll, I've never seen you. However your reply is a bit on the dooshy side. I said you are a ".edu" guy sometimes, that has nothing to do with what school you went to but the way in which you reply to people and express your views.

I would say your reply to me was a bit ".edu"

rydawg5;488013 wrote:I was just kidding about you looking like a troll, I've never seen you. However your reply is a bit on the dooshy side. I said you are a ".edu" guy sometimes, that has nothing to do with what school you went to but the way in which you reply to people and express your views.

I would say your reply to me was a bit ".edu"

So being concise and addressing the issues at hand is a bad thing now?

Followed the huddle since 04', broke down and paid the $15 to post in 07', then gave up on it when it was to be charged yearly. Or monthly how they put it. Either way I was turned off to it when their mods would delete any post I'd make about their big switch. I play the pickems in the bleacher seats forum, but thats about it.

Example #1 of what is great about the OC:

A thread entitled "How many of you posters also post on the OC" would not be tolerated.

Fly4Fun;488014 wrote:So being concise and addressing the issues at hand is a bad thing now?

No bad.. a bit snoody.. smug.. arrogant.. but in a concise and addressing way.

This guy did

I lurked on JJ for quite a while, got an account near the end, and then transferred over here in the first week.