E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Sep 10, 2010 9:26am
Okay, rmolin. But can you verify the genital warts?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19a0b/19a0bf089050b592c3fc9ecdd00dd779ae028d99" alt="dazedconfused's avatar"
dazedconfused
Posts: 2,662
Sep 10, 2010 9:54am
no i wouldn't turn her down, but after reading that article, she is straight out of the trailer park lol
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b91a5/b91a59863b3ba9a10b399df4ee47107d25c3250f" alt="rmolin73's avatar"
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Sep 13, 2010 8:14pm
enigmaax;478330 wrote:Okay, rmolin. But can you verify the genital warts?
That would take further inspection with my probe
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb970/eb9701f644a92b14d28b29d0c9d1daed5b3d87a1" alt="redfalcon's avatar"
redfalcon
Posts: 1,088
Sep 13, 2010 8:46pm
I can honestly say that I would turn her down and that I bet you this guy wins (although I say it gets settled way before it goes to court).
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Sep 13, 2010 9:02pm
Yeah, that isn't even remotely close to how she really appears, even during her best years. I don't know why people give Maxim, Playboy, etc... credence. They might as well take pictures of barbie dolls. They falsify their models' images so much it is borderline fraudulent. The reason why it isn't fraudulent is the readers should be smart enough to know it isn't a real image.gerb131;478302 wrote:Monet couldn't have done a better touch up job than that mag cover. She looks good but not that good.