osu45804
Posts: 6,188
Sep 6, 2010 11:50am
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Sep 6, 2010 11:52am
As much as I hate to say it...the Ravens are looking real good now.
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Sep 6, 2010 11:56am
Damn......that's a great pick up.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Sep 6, 2010 12:16pm
Things are looking up for the Ravens.
Art Modell
Posts: 2,338
Sep 6, 2010 12:43pm
Dont get all excited about a player that got cut by the Seahawks. You guys act like he's Jerry Rice. Seattle cut him for Christ sakes.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Sep 6, 2010 12:48pm
They still won't complete a pass in week one now that Revis is back. 
Non
Posts: 9,517
Sep 6, 2010 12:49pm
He did have over 75 receptions and 900 yards last year.
I really didn't watch Seattle one time but I'm a little surprised at some of the teams that didn't want TJ.
He's still a good target for the short routes.
I really didn't watch Seattle one time but I'm a little surprised at some of the teams that didn't want TJ.
He's still a good target for the short routes.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Sep 6, 2010 1:05pm
justincredible;473170 wrote:They still won't complete a pass in week one now that Revis is back.
Ha he can't cover everyone.
swamisez
Posts: 1,990
Sep 6, 2010 1:50pm
Ravens offense looks pretty impressive on paper, and their production in the preseason was great.
Defense, specifically the secondary looks vulnerable. I still think they can outscore opponents if they so choose.
Defense, specifically the secondary looks vulnerable. I still think they can outscore opponents if they so choose.
swamisez
Posts: 1,990
Sep 6, 2010 1:51pm
Ravens offense looks pretty impressive on paper, and their production in the preseason was great.
Defense, specifically the secondary looks vulnerable. I still think they can outscore opponents if they so choose.
Defense, specifically the secondary looks vulnerable. I still think they can outscore opponents if they so choose.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Sep 6, 2010 2:17pm
Art Modell;473165 wrote:Dont get all excited about a player that got cut by the Seahawks. You guys act like he's Jerry Rice. Seattle cut him for Christ sakes.
They cut him because he was unhappy and getting a boatload of cash. It was a great pickup.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Sep 6, 2010 3:03pm
justincredible;473170 wrote:They still won't complete a pass in week one now that Revis is back.
So its gonna be a game with NO completions??? At least Flacco can blame his errant throws on Revis, what is Sanchez gonna use for an excuse?
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Sep 6, 2010 4:47pm
Championship.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Sep 6, 2010 5:24pm
Laley23;473302 wrote:So its gonna be a game with NO completions??? At least Flacco can blame his errant throws on Revis, what is Sanchez gonna use for an excuse?
Tacos. Too many tacos.
Heelz
Posts: 780
Sep 6, 2010 5:26pm
Great pick up for the Ravens, I hated this guy when he played for Cinnci just because he always did great against them. Can't wait for the season to start so the Ravens can get on with winning the Super Bowl this year.....yea I said it Super Bowl!!!
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Sep 6, 2010 5:28pm
Heelz;473522 wrote:Great pick up for the Ravens, I hated this guy when he played for Cinnci just because he always did great against them. Can't wait for the season to start so the Ravens can get on with winning the Super Bowl this year.....yea I said it Super Bowl!!!
Good call man.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Sep 6, 2010 5:38pm
justincredible;473518 wrote:Tacos. Too many tacos.
Gotcha. I thought the shake weight mightve thrown off his release point. Or the cheeseburgers slowed him down..but I think that was only a problem for the defense lol.
S
sportswizuhrd
Posts: 3,215
Sep 6, 2010 11:11pm
+1.bigdaddy2003;473529 wrote:Good call man.
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Sep 7, 2010 10:27am
Automatik;473266 wrote:They cut him because he was unhappy and getting a boatload of cash. It was a great pickup.
Please don't confuse Art Modell with logic and facts.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 7, 2010 2:21pm
Ravens are without Reed for weeks, and their corners are borderline pathetic....I dont see them winning a superbowl. Housh is over the hill, Heap is aging fast and Ray Lewis isnt exactly a spring chicken. Theyll be solid but def not a superbowl team IMO
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Sep 7, 2010 2:46pm
Hb31187;474794 wrote:Ravens are without Reed for weeks, and their corners are borderline pathetic....I dont see them winning a superbowl. Housh is over the hill, Heap is aging fast and Ray Lewis isnt exactly a spring chicken. Theyll be solid but def not a superbowl team IMO
Well you are right on a few things. Reed is out and Ray Lewis isn't a spring chicken. I wouldn't go so far as to say the corners are pathetic though. I don't think Housh is over the hill but I guess we will just have to wait and see how the Ravens do this season.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 7, 2010 2:51pm
Carr and Fabian Washington shouldnt be starting corners on a superbowl contender IMO(Unless im wrong and Wilson is starting in place of one of them?). I see them winning the wild card coming in 2nd place in the division to the Bengals and losing in the Wildcard round. Just a guess.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Sep 7, 2010 3:04pm
Hb31187;474830 wrote:Carr and Fabian Washington shouldnt be starting corners on a superbowl contender IMO(Unless im wrong and Wilson is starting in place of one of them?). I see them winning the wild card coming in 2nd place in the division to the Bengals and losing in the Wildcard round. Just a guess.
Carr isn't that bad but I agree about Washington. He commits way too many penalties. Lardarius Webb will probably start over Washington once he comes back. I think he is hurt. I'm not sure.
I just don't see the Bengals being as good as they were last season.
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Sep 7, 2010 4:06pm
The Ravens are a playoff team, but not near a SB team.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Sep 7, 2010 4:33pm
Ha I understand it's just their opinion but a lot of sports writers seem to think the Ravens have a good shot at making it. I guess we will just have to wait and see.